Sustainability of tertiary education through quality assurance and development in nigeria

Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol.4, No.15, 2013
140
Sustainability of Tertiary Education through Quality Assurance
and Development in Nigeria
Francis Akubuilo
Department of Arts Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, E-mail: drfrankakubuilo@yahoo.com
Eugene U. Okorie
Department of Science Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, E-mail: eugene.okorie@unn.edu.ng
Abstract
Tertiary education in Nigeria has witnessed rising and falling within the past three decades with the attendant
loss of status both within the sub-Saharan Africa and the world at large. This paper is focused on sustainability
of tertiary education through quality assurance and development. It examined the dwindling status and
challenges facing higher education in Nigeria. It also identified critical areas for quality assurance and
development, and suggested the need for adoption of technology-based teaching and learning as a way of
improving the quality of higher education in Nigeria.
Keywords: Sustainability, tertiary-education, quality assurance, development.
1.1 Introduction
Economic and social development is increasingly driven by the advancement and application of knowledge.
Education in general and tertiary education in particular, is widely accepted as a major instrument for the
construction of knowledge based economy and society. According to the revised National Policy on Education
(Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004), tertiary education is the education given after secondary education in
universities, colleges of education, polytechnics, and monotechnics including those institutions offering
correspondence courses. Accordingly, Section 8 of the National Policy on Education 2004 States that the goals
of tertiary education are to:
a. contribute to national development through high level relevant manpower training.
b. develop and inculcate proper values for the survival of the individual and society.
c. develop the intellectual capability of individuals to understand and appreciate their local and external
environment.
d. acquire both physical and intellectual skills which will enable individuals to be self-reliant and useful
members of the society.
e. promote and encourage scholarship and community service.
f. forge and cement national unity and
g. promote national and international understanding.
Despite the immense benefits of tertiary education to nation building, as pointed out by the above goals,
their achievements have remained a marriage. According to Olaleye (2012:580) higher education in Nigeria like
other systems of education especially in developing countries is going through a series of challenges. Saint et al
(2003) also observed that the potential of higher education systems in developing countries to fulfill its
responsibility is frequently thwarted by long-standing problems. These multi-faceted problems have inhibited
goal attainment led due to draw backs in development and have created fear and doubt about the quality of
tertiary education in Nigeria.
1.1.2 The Challenge of Quality
According to Anugwom (2009:128), education acquired is only relevant to the extent it makes notable impact in
the lives of the individual and society. The quality of tertiary education system in Nigeria reflects in its products-
the graduates. Dabalen et al (2000) observed that public and private employers of university graduates, as well as
the government itself, consider the quality of university graduates to be inadequate. Employers believe university
graduates are poorly trained and unproductive on the job and shortcomings are particularly severe in oral and
written communication, and in applied technical skills. Ayeni and Dada (2011:204), insists that the educational
system in Nigeria has not had the financial resources to maintain education quality in most of the significant
expansions. Oni (2000) posits that the factors responsible for the poor quality of university programs (and
graduates) appear to be both internal and external to the universities. internal factors include strikes, lack of
employee motivation, and weak accountability for educational performance. External factors comprise teacher

Vol.4, No.15, 2013
141
shortages, corruption, inconsistent funding efforts by government and admissions based on quotas rather than
merit.
The above factors have really engraved an indelible mark on the quality of tertiary education in Nigeria.
For instance, strike has become the only effective weapon in the hands of education workers to get what is due to
them from the government. Thus, hardly is any agreement reached or implemented without strike. Some
institutions spend upwards of three to six months on strike within one academic session, only to rush back and
conduct examinations for the students. The result is that the students concentrate on doing everything possible to
pass the examination rather than reading to acquire relevant knowledge.
Shortage of teachers fueled by brain-drain and inadequate funds to recruit more teachers also has
significant impact on the quality of education. It leads to high student and academic staff ratio, resulting to
situations where academic staff teaches up to six courses in a semester, at times, at both the undergraduate and
high degree levels. The implication is that most academic staff has no time for research as they find solace in
preparation and distribution of handouts and mini-text books.
Another factor that affects quality of education is the quota admission system. Under the system, 30%
of admissions into federal universities is reserved for catchment area 20% for educationally disadvantaged
students, 10% at the vice chancellors’ discretion. Only 40% of students were admitted on the basis of the merits
of their academic performance. (Saint et al 2003).Adeyemi (2001) cited in Saint et al (2003), found that there is
significant differences in academic performance between students admitted on merit and those admitted on other
criteria. He also discovered that the drop-out and repetition rate for the latter group was three times higher than
for the merit-based group.
1.1.3 The Dwindling Status of Nigerian Universities
The history of university education in Nigeria started with the establishment of university college Ibadan in 1948
notably the University of Nigeria Nsukka, 1960, University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), 1962,
Ahmadu Bellow University, Zaria 1962 and University of Lagos, 1962 (Ekundayo and Ajayi 2009). The growth
of tertiary education continued with more federal, state, and private universities. Polytechnics and colleges of
education were not left out. As at 2012, there were 37 federal universities, 38 state universities and 50 private
universities (NUC 2012). There are also 52 colleges of education and 44 polytechnics in Nigeria.
According to Saint et al (2003), by 1980, Nigeria had established a well-regarded higher education
system offering instruction at an international standard in a number of disciplinary areas. The universities of
Ibadan and Ahmadu Bello, for example, earned global recognition for their research in tropical health and
agriculture, respectively. Under successive military governments during the 1980s and 1990s, however, this
sparkling reputation steadily tarnished. Low level of investment in research capacity and education could be
blamed for this. On research side, Nigerian’s number of scientific publications for 1995 was 711-significantly
less than its output of 1,062 scientific publications in 1981 by comparatively much smaller universities. In
contrast, scientific publications were 3,413 for South Africa, 14,883 for India, 310 for Indonesia, and 5,440 for
Brazil (TASK FORCE 2000 Cited in Saint et al 2003).
Although it is Africa’s largest country with 20 percent of the region’s population, Nigeria has only 15
scientists and engineers engaged in research and development per million persons. This compares with 168 in
Brazil, 459 in China, 158 in India, and 4,103 in the United States (World Bank 2002 cited in Saint et al 2003).
Despite the democratic government in place since 1999, various reforms in education sector, and
increased number of tertiary institutions, Nigeria remains Africa’s sleeping giant. With a population of over 150
million and about 125 universities, no Nigerian university is regarded as World Class. In contrast, South Africa,
with a population of 51.77 million people and less than 50 universities, has a number of her universities rated as
World Class. According to the World University Rankings 2012-2013 published by the Times Higher Education
World University Rankings, no Nigerian University made the list. Strikingly, South Africa has four universities
in that list. University of Cape Town ranked 113, University of Witwatersrand, 226-250, Stellenbosch
University, 251-275 and university of Kwazulu-Natal, 351-400. (Times Higher Education 2012).
The present situation indicates that Nigeria is backward in terms of quality of higher education, not only
in the world but also within the African continent. The scenario appears worrisome when viewed against the
background that Nigeria once served as the hub of university education in West African sub-region. Recent
changes in education policies which led to the establishment of more public and private universities have not
helped matters as increase in the number of educational institutions only addresses the issue of access, while
other factors such as shortage of teaching staff, research grants, infrastructure, corruption, weak technology and
other related issues are still facing the Nigerian education system.

Vol.4, No.15, 2013
142
1.1.4 Critical Areas of Quality Assurance
According to Chambers (2004) quality is the degree or extent of excellence of something. It has to do with the
standard expected of a product or service. On the other hand, quality assurance has to do with the maintenance of
a desired level of quality or standard in product or service. In regards to education, quality assurance implies
consistent maintenance of standard of education. Quality assurance in tertiary education in Nigeria is imperative
in four critical areas; namely: Human capital, content, process, and output.
1.1.5 Quality of Human Capital
The quality of education to a large extent depends on the quality of teachers. Accoriding to Oliver (2001), most
universities today are grappling with issues associated with up skilling their staff to enable them to make
efficient use of new technologies in their teaching. In today’s technology driven world, high quality teachers
with knowledge of information and communication technology must be maintained in order to produce quality
graduates
1.1.6 Quality of Content
The quality of curriculum and academic programs in the nation’s tertiary education system should be made to
meet the needs of the society that consume its products. As pointed out by Duchastel (1997) there are changes
that are now flowing through education systems worldwide in response to a growing awareness and
understanding of how learning occurs. These changes include:
* A Move away from specified content to learn to specified learning outcomes.
* An acceptance of diversity in outcomes among learners rather than the goal of common results.
* A focus on the process of learning as well as the product.
* Evaluation of outcomes in practical contexts and in terms of tasks as distinct from discrete knowledge;
and
* An acceptance of the role of social cognition in learning.
1.1.7 Quality of Process
The quality of learning/teaching process is vital to the overall quality of education. Ali and Akubue (1998) Cited
in Oladipo et al (2009), found that teachers dominate in lessons and pose few open-ended questions. Group work
which encourages discussion is rarely encountered, and only 10% of teachers used continuous assessment.
Oliver (2001) posits that effective tertiary teaching and learning setting should support and encourage:
a. High levels of students activity and encouragement.
b. Forms of collaboration and cooperation among learners.
c. Situations where learners are exposed to a variety of different perspectives.
d. Assessment that forms integral part of the learning process and is sensitive to the intended uses of the
learning outside the classroom.
1.1.8 Quality of Output
The output of an educational system is the graduates of that system. Quality of output has two dimensions,
internal and external. The internal consists of the test scores, pass rates and general performance of students
before graduation. The external manifestation of output quality is found in their performances and achievements
on the job outside the school system. As pointed out by Mosha (1997) cited in Oladipo (2009), quality of
education is measured by the extent to which the training received from an institution enables the recipient to
think clearly, independently and analytically to solve relevant societal problems in any given environment.
To ensure quality of output, the following measures are necessary:
1. Admission into tertiary institution should be based on merit and not on quota.
2. Course content should meet labor market demands.
3. Minimum academic standard should be met before progression
4. Institutions should invest in information and communication technology as a means of providing
learning resources to teachers and students using web based technologies. Oliver (2000) identified four
categories of learning resources and strategies for web-based learning environment.
2.1 Conclusion
The role of higher education in economic and social development is very strategic and indispensable. The
dwindling quality of education in Nigeria has become perennial issues that require pragmatic approach.

Vol.4, No.15, 2013
143
Sustainable tertiary education is possible if quality assurance and development are given deserved attention.
Without quality assurance and development, sustainability of tertiary education in Nigeria will remain an elusive
endeavor. There is need to adopt technology-based teaching and learning as a means of improving quality and
sustaining higher education in Nigeria.
3.1 Implications to Educational Practice
Nigeria’s higher educations are likely to be downgraded to degree mill offerings if the current trend of down
slide is not checked. The urge to continue to approve new generational universities is flawed without adequate
infrastructure and planning. The existing institutions need desperate help from the government in checkmating
the causes to the dwindling quality assurance in Nigerian higher institutions.
Nigeria may longer meet her desired aspirations to be among top 20 world economies if Nigerian
education continues to slide. Quality education is highly relevant to the Nation’s economic development that
seeks to provide well qualified graduates capable of meeting the global challenges of a competitive world
economy.
4.1 Recommendations
The authors recommend that Nigeria should boost the quality assurance of the nation’s institutions of higher
learning. Nigeria should slow the pace of establishing or approving new generational universities and improve in
student recruitment, teacher retention, and overall management.
References
Ajayi, I.A. and Ayodde J.B. (2002). Fundamentals of educational management. Ado-Ekiti: Green Line
Publishers.
Aluede, O. Idogho. P.O. and Imonikhe J.S. (2012). Increasing access to university education in Nigeria:Present
challenges and suggestions for the future. The Africa Symposium: An online Journal of the African
Educational Research Network. Vol 12. No 1. June.
Anugwom, E .E. (2009). Women, education and work in Nigeria. Educational Research and Review. Vol 4. No 4
pp. 127-134. April. Accessed online at www.academicjournaly.org.
Ayeni.M.A. and Dada. M.A (2011) An Exploration into the education innovations in Nigeria in The last two
decades. Journal of Emerging Trends In Educational Research And Policy Studies Vol. 2 No 4
www.jeteraph.scholarlinkresearch.org.
Chambers (2004). The 21st Century Dictionary. Edinburgh: Harap Publishers.
Clark B. (2001). The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy and
Achievement. Higher Education Management vol. 13, No 2.
Dabalen. A. Oni. B, And Adekola O. (2001). Labor market prospects for university graduates in Nigeria. Higher
Education Policy vol. 14 PP 141-159.
Dachastel.P. (1997). A web-based model for university instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems.
vol. 25 No 3. PP 221-228.
Ekundayo H.T. and Ajayi I.A. (2009). Towards effective management of university education in Nigeria.
International N.G.O Journal Vol 4 No 8. Accessed online at www.academicjournals.org
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004). National Policy on Education. Lagos: NERDC Press.
Federal Ministry of Education (2009). Road map for the Nigeria Education Sector. Abuja: Federal Ministry of
Education.
National University Commission (2012). List of Approved Universities in Nigeria. www.ncic.edu.ng
Okebukola P.C. (2008). Education Reform: Imperatives for achieving Vision 20-20. Paper presented at the
National Summit on Education organized by the Senate Committee on Education held at Sheraton
Hotel. Abuja 10-11 December.
Oladipo. A., Adeosun. O. And Oni .A. (2009). Quality assurance and sustainable university education in Nigeria.
Accessed online at www.adcice.hiroshima.u/research/paper-109/pdf.
Olaleye F.O. (2012) Sustainability of private sector participation in the provision of access to higher education in
Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, Vol. 3 No 4
www.jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.org.
Oliver .R. (2000). Developing and sustaining technology-based learning in higher Education: The way ahead.
Accessed online at www.citeseerx.1st.psu.edu/viewdoc.
Oni. B. (2000). The demand for universities graduates and employers’ assessment of graduate skills in Nigeria.
Ibadan: Nigerian Institute of Soical and Economic Research.

Vol.4, No.15, 2013
144
Saint .W., Hartnett.T.A. and Strassner. E. (2003). Higher education in Nigeria: A Status Report. Higher
Education Policy Vol 16.
Times Higher Education (2012). World University Rankings 2012-2013. www.timeshighereducation.28.co.uk.
Table 1. Learning Resources and Strategies for Web-based learning Environment
Learning
strategy
Learning activity Examples
Information
Access
The Web is used to convey information
alone to the learner, for example, a course
syllabus, a calendar, assignment
descriptions, lecture notes, workshop
descriptions etc.
PDF files, HTML documents,
streaming audio, streaming
video, applications files, eg.
Papers, spreadsheets etc.
Interactive
Learning
The Web is used to involve instructional
elements that engage the learner,
encourage reflection and decision making
and provide feedback in response to
learner actions
Java Applets, Shockwave
movies, animations.
Networked
Communication
The Web is used to provide a means for
the organization, communication and
exchange of ideas and information among
learners and teachers and other parties in
the learning process
List servers, email, chat,
discussion groups
Materials
Development
When the Web is used as a means for
learners to create and publish materials.
The WWW is used as a tool for gathering
and collecting information and presenting
that information in a published form.
Creating and publishing Web
pages, Web content, FTP
processes.
Source: Oliver R. (2000) Developing and sustaining technology- based learning in higher education: the way
ahead.

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/
The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Sustainability of tertiary education through quality assurance and development in nigeria

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Sustainability of tertiary education through quality assurance and development in nigeria

More from Alexander Decker

Recently uploaded

Sustainability of tertiary education through quality assurance and development in nigeria