SVD and Lifting Wavelet Based Fragile Image Watermarking

ACEEE Int. J. on Signal & Image Processing, Vol. 02, No. 01, Jan 2011

SVD and Lifting Wavelet Based Fragile Image
Watermarking
Swanirbhar Majumder1, Tirtha Sankar Das2, Souvik Sarkar2, and Subir Kumar Sarkar2
1
Department of ECE, NERIST (Deemed University), Arunachal Pradesh 791109, India
Email: swanirbhar@gmail.com
2
Department of ETCE, Jadavpur University,Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Email: tirthasankardas@yahoo.com, sksarkar@etce.jdvu.ac.in

Abstract—Creation and distribution of digital multimedia, by a good image authenticating watermarking scheme the
copying and editing, has both advantages and disadvantages. fragile watermark should necessarily fulfill some
These can facilitate unauthorized usage, misappropriation, conditions. For the scheme of fragile watermark presented
and misrepresentation. Therefore the content providers have here mainly two transforms are used one for the carrier
become more concerned. So image watermarking, which is the
act of embedding another signal (the watermark) into an
image, and the other for the logo or watermark to be
image, have been proposed for copyright protection and embedded in the carrier. Lifting based wavelet transform
authentication by robust and fragile methodologies with spline 5/3 wavelet has been used for the carrier image
respectively. So for various applications, there are different and singular value decomposition based image
watermarking algorithms, but here this work is mainly for compression scheme has been used for the logo or
authentication as the watermarking scheme is fragile. The watermark.
discrete lifting based wavelet transform and the singular value
decomposition (SVD) algorithms are used in this scheme. The A. Lifting Based Wavelet Transform
former for the carrier or the image to be authenticated, while Instead of the traditional DWT method multi-level
the latter for the logo which is embedded in the carrier. The discrete two-dimension wavelet transform based on lifting
distribution of SVD compressed pixel values are distributed in method is used. It is multilevel as based on algorithm the
the wavelet domain based on a pseudorandom sequence. This
level can be decided on. The wavelets used are Cohen-
has been observed to test the integrity of the stego image and
its authentication. Moreover due to usage of lifting based Daubechies-Feauveau (CDF) 9/7 wavelet, which is the
wavelet transform and SVD the hardware implementability is name 'cdf97' and spline 5/3 with the name 'spl53',
better. specifically. Still other wavelets can be used as well as per
the necessity of the watermarking application. Here step
Index Terms—Fragile watermarking, SVD, Lifting based wise 1-D FWT is performed based on lifting method to get
wavelet transform, pseudorandom sequence, stego image. the whole set of multilevel transform. This is actually a
deliberately organized lifting structure provided as an
I. INTRODUCTION intermediate block of the multilevel wavelet transform.
With the advances in digital media, and easier The lifting structure is organized such that a 1-by-1
distribution of multimedia data like images, songs, videos, structure with two field lambda (λz) and two-element lifting
or any other type of data, along with advancement of gain vectors are used. Therefore first a lazy wavelet [10] is
software applications has become a boon as well as a curse incorporated with alternated lifting (LF) and dual lifting
to the whole world. At one end it is a necessity while on (DLF) steps for lambda (λz) being a 1-by-M structure if M
other thoughts, unauthorized usage, misappropriation, and lifting units as in figure 2 based on the Laurent
misrepresentation are its drawbacks. Thus we go for polynomials. Here there are two lambda (λz) fields for
copyright protection and authentication of all multimedia coefficients and order which denote the transfer function of
data to be at the safer side, and avoid cyber criminals. every lifting unit. The final stage has the scaling functions
One of the popular ways of doing it is watermarking, to rescale the output. Thus for a wavelet transform with 3
which may be robust or fragile. Here a fragile lifting units as under:
watermarking scheme is presented. All popular fragile λ1 = a1 + a2 z ; λ2 = b1 + b2 z −1 ; λ3 = c1 z −1 + c2 z (1)
image watermarking schemes are used for image
Thus the data structure of lambda (λz) will be composed
authentication and verification of data integrity [1]. Due to
of the coefficients and order or z:
this, applications like lossy compression are not tolerated in
image transmission or storage as the fragile watermarks are ⎛ ⎡ a1 a2 ⎤ ⎡ 0 1 ⎤ ⎞
⎜⎢ ⎟
destroyed [2] [3]. This is normally done by embedding
patterns imperceptibly in the least significant bit (LSB) or
λz = struct ⎜ ⎢ b1 b 2 ⎥ , ⎢ 0 −1⎥ ⎟
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ (2)
⎜ ⎢ c c ⎥ ⎢ −1 1 ⎥ ⎟
as hash values [4] [5].
⎝⎣ 1 2 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎠
But to classify outwardly there are mainly two types of
fragile watermarking, one done spatially [5] [6] [7] and the This structure of lambda (λz) is again under another
other in the transform domain [2] [8] [9]. To be regarded as structure for the final scaling based on itself and the two

5
© 2011 ACEEE
DOI: 01.IJSIP.02.01.83


element lifting gains [K0=1/K, K1=K] to produce the 1-by- square iterated logo to get the two orthogonal matrices U
1 structure with two fields lambda (λz) and scaling factor and V and the diagonal matrix S all of size 128x128. Then
K of the structure denoted by L. instead of using the whole set of matrix values, using the
L = struct (λz ,[ K 0 , K1 ]) (3) feature of SVD operation only (2x128xk+k) values are
used where k is a small value compared to 128. In this
scheme k=11 has been used for which only 2827 pixels are
to be hidden in the carrier image.

Figure 1. The forward wavelet transform with lazy wavelet, alternating
lifting and dual lifting and scaling at the end.

Figure 2. The inverse wavelet transform with scaling, alternating lifting
and dual lifting and inverse lazy wavelet at the end.

The inverse transform can immediately be derived from
the forward by running the scheme backwards as in figure
2. Here there is first a scaling, then alternating dual lifting
and lifting steps, and finally the inverse Lazy transform.
Figure 3. The watermarking process with (a) Original Image; (b) 3 Level
B. Singular Value Decomposition Lifted DWT; (c) SVD based LOGO; (d) Watermarked 3 Level Lifted
DWT and (e) 3 Level Lifted inverse DWT image i.e. the watermarked
Singular value decomposition (SVD) technique, a
image.
generalization of the eigen-value decomposition, is used to
analyze rectangular matrices and has been used in many In this method the HH1 band is left free as it contains the
areas of image processing as well. The main idea of the diagonal components of high frequency both row as well as
SVD is to decompose a rectangular matrix into three column wise. In the rest, the U and V pixels (i.e. 1408
simple matrices (two orthogonal matrices and one diagonal each) are distributed in the first horizontal and vertical
matrix) [11] [12]. It has been widely studied and used for coefficient sets of 128x128 (16348) values LH1 and HL1,
watermarking by researchers for long. But unlike the other respectively. While the main (11) diagonal components of
schemes here it has been used to compress the logo to be S are multipled and distributed in the LL1 band
watermarked. Thereby utilizing the image compression decomposed to LL3, LH3, HL3, HH3, LH2, HL2 and HH2.
scheme of SVD here, and not for watermarking [13-17]. All of these distributions for the U, V and multipled S are
Moreover the orthogonal matrices and the diagonal matrix based on a particular seed (‘key’) used to generate the
are embedded in the carrier instead of the logo image itself. pseudorandom sequence based on which these are
distributed. The scheme is in figure 4. Later the 3 level
II. THE WATERMARKING SCHEME lifting based inverse discrete wavelet transform is
undergone to get back the watermarked image.
A. Watermark Embeddeding Process B. Watermark Extraction
The carrier image, which here is the standard ‘lena’ The detection of the watermark from the stego image is
image firstly, is undergone 3 level lifting based two just the reverse of the embedding operation. This extraction
dimensional discrete wavelet transform using the spline process is of non-oblivious type. As the ‘key’ i.e. initial
5/3, 'spl53' wavelet. On this wavelet domain image which seed for the pseudorandom sequence and the value of ‘k’
has sub bands LL3, LH3, HL3, HH3, LH2, HL2, HH2, i.e. the number of elements of the diagonal S matrix are to
LH1, HL1 and HH1. Here LL stands for the approximate be known at the receiver side. This is because the stego
coefficients, LH for the horizontal coefficients, HL for the image when received under goes the reverse process of the
vertical coefficients and the HH for diagonal coefficients embedding scheme. This is as the received image is first
with the numerals being the level of transform. The logo in undergone 3 level lifting based DWT followed by
its compressed form is added to the wavelet coefficients via accumulation of the receiver end the compressed U, V and
a pseudorandom distribution covering all parts of the S matrix elements by the use of ‘key’(seed) value to get the
carrier image as in figure 3. pseudorandom positions in the LH1, HL1 and other sub
The scheme of SVD operation on the logo is based on coefficients in level 2 and level 3, respectively. This
first iterating a 32x32 logo to get a 128x128 iterated logo. collection of elements is limited by the value of ‘k’ which
This is followed by undergoing SVD operation on the
6
© 2011 ACEEE
DOI: 01.IJSIP.02.01.83


determines the number of elements in each pseudorandom indicate the tampering for some of the popular attacks are
distribution, to get (128xk) for U and V and multipled ‘k’ provided in figures 6 to 11. The attacks considered are
elements for S. The matrices once deduced are undergone single row of pixel altered with a different pixel intensity,
the inverse SVD operation UxSxVT to get the iterated logo image cropping, image filtering, Gaussian noise attack with
matrix of size 128x128. If the matrix is clear with all the mean zero and variance of 0.02, high density of 0.2 salt and
iterated logos clearly visible and in binary form then it is pepper noise attack and the pixel copy attack. Here the
concluded that the carrier image has not been tampered extracted logo can be identified to have the original iterated
with while if any single pixel in the carrier image is altered logo characteristics even after the attacks. Along with this
that will be evident from the logo extracted having a low the distribution of the attack can also be realized by
peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) than the original observing the logo extracted and comparing with the
compressed logo. original iterated logo.

CONCLUSIONS
This SVD and lifting based discrete wavelet transform
based system of fragile watermarking fulfils its purpose of
authenticating the carrier image, as observed for the attacks
considered. The region of attack or tampering can be
detected by viewing the alterations in the extracted logo
and comparing it with the original. Unlike other popular
methods of watermarking this is not a hybrid scheme,
involving two transforms on the carrier itself. Rather one of
the transforms act on the carrier and the other on the logo
to be embedded, separately. The main key feature here of
both the transforms is that, both of them can be easily
implemented in hardware. This is a very important
advantage, as present-day systems are more oriented for
speed and miniaturization. So with the feature of easier
hardware implementability, both of these are taken into
Figure 4. The encoding scheme of the compressed logo in SVD account.
transform domain in the wavelet domain.

III. RESULT AND ANALYSIS
The original image when watermarked with the
aforementioned scheme is with PSNR of 42.2 dB. Thus, as
for good and imperceptible watermark the PSNR of 35-
40dB is reasonable, so the pay load does not create
problem. The original watermarked image along with the
iterated logo is given in figure 5.

Figure 6. The single pixel line alteration attack, where the first row of
pixel was modified and resultant effect on the logo.

Figure 5. The watermarked lena image (256x256) with PSNR of 42.2dB
with the original iterated logo (128x128).

Though the HH1 set of coefficients were not containing
any watermark data, still if any alteration is done in the Figure 7. The image crop attack and resultant effect on the logo.
high frequency they can be detected as the other bands like
LH1, HL1, HH2, LH2, HL2, HH3, LH3 and HL3 too
contain a good deal of high frequency components and they
are all inter related mathematically unless there is any
tampering. The resultant logo alterations achieved to
7
© 2011 ACEEE
DOI: 01.IJSIP.02.01.83


Authentication”, Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 87, No.7, pp.
1167-1180, 1999.
[3] M. Swanson, M. Kobayashi, A. Tewfik, “Multimedia data-
embedding and watermarking technologies,” Proceedings of
the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1064-1087, June 1998.
[4] D. Stinson, Cryptography Theory and Practice, CRC Press,
Boca Raton, 1995.
[5] R. Wolfgang and E. Delp, “Fragile watermarking using the
VW2D watermark,” Proceedings of the IS&T/SPIE
Conference on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia
Contents, pp. 204-213, San Jose, California, January 1999.
[6] N. Memon, S. Shende, and P. Wong, “On the security of the
Figure 8. The image filtering attack and resultant effect on the logo.
Yueng-Mintzer Authentication Watermark,” Final Program
and Proceedings of the IS&T PICS 99, pp. 301-306,
Savanna, Georgia, April 1999.
[7] R. Wolfgang and E. Delp, “A watermark for digital images,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image
Processing, vol. 3, pp. 219-222, 1996.
[8] M. Wu and B. Liu, “Watermarking for image
authentication,” Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 437-441,
Chicago, Illinois, October 1998.
[9] L. Xie and G. Arce, “Joint wavelet compression and
authentication watermarking,” Proceedings of the IEEE
International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp.
Figure 9. The Gaussian noise attack and resultant effect on the logo. 427-431, Chicago, Illinois, October 1998.
[10] W. Sweldens. The lifting scheme: A custom-design
construction of biorthogonal wavelets. Appl. Comput.
Harmon. Anal., 3(2):186–200, 1996.
[11] Ruizhen Liu and Tieniu Tan, "A SVD-based watermarking
scheme for protecting rightful ownership", IEEE transactions
on multimedia, vol. 4, pp 121-128, March 2002
[12] Xinzhong Zhu, Jianmin Zhao and Huiying Xu, "A digital
watermarking algorithm and implementation based on
improved SVD" proceedings of the 18th IEEE Computer
Society International Conference on Pattern Recognition
(ICPR'06)
[13] S. Majumder and M. A. Hussain, “A comparative study of
Figure 10. The salt and pepper noise attack and resultant effect on the image compression techniques based on SVD, DWT-SVD
logo. and DWT-DCT” pg 500-504 at International Conference on
Systemics, Cybernetics, Informatics (ICSCI-2008).
[14] S. Majumder, A.D. Singh, and M. Mishra, "A Hybrid SVD
and Wavelet based Watermarking", pg 197-20, at 2nd
National Conference Mathematical Techniques: Emerging
Paradigms for Electronics and IT Industries (MATEIT 08).
[15] S. Majumder, T.S. Das, V.H. Mankar and S.K. Sarkar, "SVD
and Error Control Coding based Digital Image
Watermarking", International Conference on Advances in
Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies
(ACT 2009), pg 60-63, ISBN 978-0-7695-3915-7
[16] S. Majumder, T. S. Das, S. Sarkar, S. K. Sarkar, "Image
Watermarking by Fast Lifting Wavelet Transform",
proceedings of 3rd National Conference Mathematical
Figure 11. The pixel alteration attack and resultant effect on the logo. Techniques: Emerging Paradigms for Electronics and IT
Industries (MATEIT '10), January 2010.
[17] S. Majumder, T.S. Das, V.H. Mankar and S.K. Sarkar, "SVD
REFERENCES and Neural Network based Watermarking Scheme",
[1] E. T. Lin and E. J. Delp, “A Review of Fragile Image proceedings of International Conference on Recent Trends in
Watermarks”, Proceedings of the Multimedia and Security Business Administration and Information Processing (BAIP
Workshop, pp. 25-29, 1999. 2010), Springer LNCS-CCIS, ISSN: 1865-0929
[2] Deepa Kundur and Dimitrios Hatzinakos, “Digital
Watermarking for Telltale Tamper Proofing and

8
© 2011 ACEEE
DOI: 01.IJSIP.02.01.83

SVD and Lifting Wavelet Based Fragile Image Watermarking

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to SVD and Lifting Wavelet Based Fragile Image Watermarking (20)

More from IDES Editor (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

SVD and Lifting Wavelet Based Fragile Image Watermarking