SlideShare a Scribd company logo
4
Most read
5
Most read
8
Most read
Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition
Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition
Symbolism and Diagrams
for Categorical
Propositions
 Categorical proposition is the base for the
Classical Logic. They are called
categorical propositions because they are
about categories or classes.
 Such propositions affirm or deny that
some class S is included in some other
class p, completely or partially.
 Boolean interpretation of categorical
propositions depends heavily on the notation
of an empty class, it is convenient to have a
symbol to represent it.
 The symbol zero 0, is used for this purpose.
 The term S has no members, we write an equal
sign between S and 0.
 Thus the equation S = 0 says that there are no
S’s, or that S has no members.
 To deny that S is empty S does have members.
 We symbolize that denial by drawing a
slanting line through the equals sign.
 The inequality S ≠ 0 says that there are S’s, by
denying that S is empty.
 To symbolize A proposition.
 The A proposition, “All S is P”, says that all
members of class S are also member of the class
P.
 That is, there are no members of the class S
that that are not members of P or “No S is non-
P”
 To symbolize E propositions.
 The E propositions, “No S is P”, says that no
members of the class S are the members of class
P.
 This can be rephrased by saying that the
product of the two classes is empty which is
symbolized by the equation SP = 0.
 To symbolize I proposition.
 The I proposition “Some S is P”, says that at
least one member of S is also a member of P.
 This means that the product of the classes S
and P is not empty.
 It is symbolized by the inequality SP ≠ 0.
 To symbolize O proposition.
 The O proposition, “Some S is not P”, obverts
to the logically equivalent to I propositions,
“Some S is non-P”.
 It is symbolized by the inequality SP ≠ 0.
 The relationship between these propositions contradict
each other in several ways, as can be illustrated here.
This diagram shows that :
1. Contradictories
2. Contrary
3. Sub-Contrary
4. Sub-Alternation
 Contradictory means they have opposite truth
values.
 A and O propositions are contradictory as are E
and I proposition.
 They are opposite of each other in both Quantity
and Quality therefore, have opposite truth values.
 When any Categorical statement is true, its partner
across the diagonal is false.
 When false its contradictory must be true.
Example:
if “all rubies are red stones” (A) is true, then
“some rubies are not red stones” (O) must be
false.
Similarly
if “no mammals are aquatic” (E) is false, then
“some mammals are aquatic” (I) must be true.
 A and E propositions are contrary.
 Propositions are contrary when they cannot both
be true.
Example:
An A proposition e.g. “all giraffes have long
necks” cannot be true at the same time as the
corresponding E proposition: “no giraffes have
long necks”.
 They are opposite in Quality only (both are
universals).
however that corresponding A and E proposition
while contrary are not contradictory.
 I and O propositions are Sub Contrary.
 Propositions are Sub Contrary when it is
impossible for both to false.
Example:
“some lunches are free” is false, “some lunches
are not free” must be true.
However that is possible for corresponding I and
O both to be true.
Example:
“some nations are democratic” and “some
nations are not democratic”.
Again I and O propositions are sub contrary,
but not contrary or contradictory
 Sub alternation are same in Quality but
different in Quantity.
 From A to I ( is A is true then, the I is true).
 From E to O ( if E is true then, O is true).
Now for Falsity
 From I to A ( if the I is false, then A is false).
 From O to E (if O is false then, E is false).
All S are P. No S are P.
Some S are P. Some S are not P.
 The Venn diagrams constitute an iconic
representation of the standard form categorical
propositions, in which spatial inclusions and
exclusions correspond to the non-spatial
inclusions and exclusions of classes.
 They provide an exceptionally clear method of
notation.
Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition
Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition

More Related Content

DOCX
Notes for logic
Amit Chaudhary
 
PPT
Categorical propositions
Abdul Qadir Memon
 
PPTX
Introduction to Logic
Shahi Raz Akhtar
 
PPT
4.4 Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
Nicholas Lykins
 
PPTX
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
ashelle14
 
DOCX
Propostions
Kate Sevilla
 
PPTX
Distribution of terms
Megha Gupta
 
PPT
Logic introduction
Abdul Qadir Memon
 
Notes for logic
Amit Chaudhary
 
Categorical propositions
Abdul Qadir Memon
 
Introduction to Logic
Shahi Raz Akhtar
 
4.4 Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
Nicholas Lykins
 
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
ashelle14
 
Propostions
Kate Sevilla
 
Distribution of terms
Megha Gupta
 
Logic introduction
Abdul Qadir Memon
 

What's hot (20)

PPTX
judgment and proposition
Alkhalif Amberol
 
PDF
Laws of logic
Alan Haller
 
DOCX
Logic & critical thinking
AMIR HASSAN
 
PDF
Truth Vs. Validity
LisaMD4061
 
PPT
4.3 Venn Diagrams And The Modern Square Of Opposition
Nicholas Lykins
 
PPTX
Types of Argument presentation
Awais Ali
 
PDF
Syllogism its types with examples shown by venn diagram and their fallacy
EHSAN KHAN
 
PDF
RULES OF SYLLOGISM.pdf
GailaMagallanes
 
PPT
Categorical syllogism
3842
 
PPTX
Hum 200 w7
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 
PDF
Socratic method
Glen Alleman
 
PPTX
Ethical subjectivism
HeCallsMeBeau
 
PPT
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
shovanam Prakash
 
PPTX
SPEECH ACT THEORY
Ali Soomro
 
PPT
10 the poverty of the stimulus argument
Hana Zarei
 
PPTX
Types of arguments
Zarmeen Durrani
 
PPTX
The Importance of Logic
Jonathan Fan
 
PPTX
Contraposition (LOGIC)
Trisha Lane Atienza
 
judgment and proposition
Alkhalif Amberol
 
Laws of logic
Alan Haller
 
Logic & critical thinking
AMIR HASSAN
 
Truth Vs. Validity
LisaMD4061
 
4.3 Venn Diagrams And The Modern Square Of Opposition
Nicholas Lykins
 
Types of Argument presentation
Awais Ali
 
Syllogism its types with examples shown by venn diagram and their fallacy
EHSAN KHAN
 
RULES OF SYLLOGISM.pdf
GailaMagallanes
 
Categorical syllogism
3842
 
Hum 200 w7
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 
Socratic method
Glen Alleman
 
Ethical subjectivism
HeCallsMeBeau
 
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
shovanam Prakash
 
SPEECH ACT THEORY
Ali Soomro
 
10 the poverty of the stimulus argument
Hana Zarei
 
Types of arguments
Zarmeen Durrani
 
The Importance of Logic
Jonathan Fan
 
Contraposition (LOGIC)
Trisha Lane Atienza
 
Ad

Viewers also liked (8)

PPTX
Categorical Propositions- Logic
Kent Sunglao
 
PPTX
Conditional statement and material implication
Majid Orakzai
 
PPTX
Hum 200 w7 ch6 syllog
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 
PPTX
Categorical propositions
anandhjose
 
PPTX
Syllogistic figures
Jayneil Louise Enriquez
 
PPTX
History of logic
Ch Asim Jutt
 
PPTX
Propositional logic
ForwardBlog Enewzletter
 
PDF
Tablas de torque
Ivancho Ayala Z
 
Categorical Propositions- Logic
Kent Sunglao
 
Conditional statement and material implication
Majid Orakzai
 
Hum 200 w7 ch6 syllog
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 
Categorical propositions
anandhjose
 
Syllogistic figures
Jayneil Louise Enriquez
 
History of logic
Ch Asim Jutt
 
Propositional logic
ForwardBlog Enewzletter
 
Tablas de torque
Ivancho Ayala Z
 
Ad

Similar to Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition (19)

PPTX
A categorical proposition asserts that either all or part of the class denote...
sisay donis
 
PPT
categorical logic.ppt
GulEFarisFaris
 
PPTX
M1_-_2._Philosophical_theories.pptxndnfnfnfkd
Lurdes Sousa
 
PPTX
Chapter 1
scrasnow
 
PDF
Chapter10
Bilal Maqbool ツ
 
PPT
Discrete Maths141 - Course Outline and Lecture Slides
AryanZia3
 
PPTX
Law of distribution
abdulhaleem00
 
PPTX
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
Ani Istiana
 
PPTX
Lecture_-_Logic.pptttttttttttttr5rr55rtt
CrenzylAzeaCawaling
 
PPT
4.1 And 4.2 Categorical Propositions
Nicholas Lykins
 
PDF
General Mathematics. Quarter 2 Module 5.
joanainoferio0712
 
PPT
6.1 Symbols And Translation
Nicholas Lykins
 
PPT
6.1 Symbols And Translation
Nicholas Lykins
 
PPT
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 1
David Wood
 
PPTX
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
ssuser92109d
 
PPTX
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS for IT students.pptx
ReymartVillapea
 
PPT
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
sagebennet
 
PPT
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
sagebennet
 
PPTX
Hum 200 w4 ch5 catprops
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 
A categorical proposition asserts that either all or part of the class denote...
sisay donis
 
categorical logic.ppt
GulEFarisFaris
 
M1_-_2._Philosophical_theories.pptxndnfnfnfkd
Lurdes Sousa
 
Chapter 1
scrasnow
 
Discrete Maths141 - Course Outline and Lecture Slides
AryanZia3
 
Law of distribution
abdulhaleem00
 
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
Ani Istiana
 
Lecture_-_Logic.pptttttttttttttr5rr55rtt
CrenzylAzeaCawaling
 
4.1 And 4.2 Categorical Propositions
Nicholas Lykins
 
General Mathematics. Quarter 2 Module 5.
joanainoferio0712
 
6.1 Symbols And Translation
Nicholas Lykins
 
6.1 Symbols And Translation
Nicholas Lykins
 
CPSC 125 Ch 1 sec 1
David Wood
 
20220818151924_PPT01 - The Logic of Compound and Quantitative Statement.pptx
ssuser92109d
 
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS for IT students.pptx
ReymartVillapea
 
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
sagebennet
 
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
sagebennet
 
Hum 200 w4 ch5 catprops
LOGIC - Roy Shaff
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Drug-Discovery by R D Jawarkar.pptx
Rahul Jawarkar
 
PPTX
How to Close Subscription in Odoo 18 - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
PPTX
A Smarter Way to Think About Choosing a College
Cyndy McDonald
 
PPTX
CONCEPT OF CHILD CARE. pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
PDF
Module 2: Public Health History [Tutorial Slides]
JonathanHallett4
 
DOCX
Modul Ajar Deep Learning Bahasa Inggris Kelas 11 Terbaru 2025
wahyurestu63
 
PPTX
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM - UNIT 2 - GNM 3RD YEAR.pptx
Priyanshu Anand
 
PPTX
Care of patients with elImination deviation.pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
PPTX
Dakar Framework Education For All- 2000(Act)
santoshmohalik1
 
PPTX
20250924 Navigating the Future: How to tell the difference between an emergen...
McGuinness Institute
 
DOCX
pgdei-UNIT -V Neurological Disorders & developmental disabilities
JELLA VISHNU DURGA PRASAD
 
PPTX
An introduction to Dialogue writing.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
PPTX
Introduction to pediatric nursing in 5th Sem..pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
PPTX
HISTORY COLLECTION FOR PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS.pptx
PoojaSen20
 
PPTX
An introduction to Prepositions for beginners.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
PDF
Health-The-Ultimate-Treasure (1).pdf/8th class science curiosity /samyans edu...
Sandeep Swamy
 
PDF
2.Reshaping-Indias-Political-Map.ppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring S...
Sandeep Swamy
 
PDF
Biological Classification Class 11th NCERT CBSE NEET.pdf
NehaRohtagi1
 
PDF
Virat Kohli- the Pride of Indian cricket
kushpar147
 
PDF
BÀI TẬP TEST BỔ TRỢ THEO TỪNG CHỦ ĐỀ CỦA TỪNG UNIT KÈM BÀI TẬP NGHE - TIẾNG A...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Drug-Discovery by R D Jawarkar.pptx
Rahul Jawarkar
 
How to Close Subscription in Odoo 18 - Odoo Slides
Celine George
 
A Smarter Way to Think About Choosing a College
Cyndy McDonald
 
CONCEPT OF CHILD CARE. pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
Module 2: Public Health History [Tutorial Slides]
JonathanHallett4
 
Modul Ajar Deep Learning Bahasa Inggris Kelas 11 Terbaru 2025
wahyurestu63
 
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM - UNIT 2 - GNM 3RD YEAR.pptx
Priyanshu Anand
 
Care of patients with elImination deviation.pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
Dakar Framework Education For All- 2000(Act)
santoshmohalik1
 
20250924 Navigating the Future: How to tell the difference between an emergen...
McGuinness Institute
 
pgdei-UNIT -V Neurological Disorders & developmental disabilities
JELLA VISHNU DURGA PRASAD
 
An introduction to Dialogue writing.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
Introduction to pediatric nursing in 5th Sem..pptx
AneetaSharma15
 
HISTORY COLLECTION FOR PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS.pptx
PoojaSen20
 
An introduction to Prepositions for beginners.pptx
drsiddhantnagine
 
Health-The-Ultimate-Treasure (1).pdf/8th class science curiosity /samyans edu...
Sandeep Swamy
 
2.Reshaping-Indias-Political-Map.ppt/pdf/8th class social science Exploring S...
Sandeep Swamy
 
Biological Classification Class 11th NCERT CBSE NEET.pdf
NehaRohtagi1
 
Virat Kohli- the Pride of Indian cricket
kushpar147
 
BÀI TẬP TEST BỔ TRỢ THEO TỪNG CHỦ ĐỀ CỦA TỪNG UNIT KÈM BÀI TẬP NGHE - TIẾNG A...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 

Symbolism And Diagram for Categorical Proposition

  • 3. Symbolism and Diagrams for Categorical Propositions
  • 4.  Categorical proposition is the base for the Classical Logic. They are called categorical propositions because they are about categories or classes.  Such propositions affirm or deny that some class S is included in some other class p, completely or partially.
  • 5.  Boolean interpretation of categorical propositions depends heavily on the notation of an empty class, it is convenient to have a symbol to represent it.  The symbol zero 0, is used for this purpose.  The term S has no members, we write an equal sign between S and 0.
  • 6.  Thus the equation S = 0 says that there are no S’s, or that S has no members.  To deny that S is empty S does have members.  We symbolize that denial by drawing a slanting line through the equals sign.  The inequality S ≠ 0 says that there are S’s, by denying that S is empty.
  • 7.  To symbolize A proposition.  The A proposition, “All S is P”, says that all members of class S are also member of the class P.  That is, there are no members of the class S that that are not members of P or “No S is non- P”
  • 8.  To symbolize E propositions.  The E propositions, “No S is P”, says that no members of the class S are the members of class P.  This can be rephrased by saying that the product of the two classes is empty which is symbolized by the equation SP = 0.
  • 9.  To symbolize I proposition.  The I proposition “Some S is P”, says that at least one member of S is also a member of P.  This means that the product of the classes S and P is not empty.  It is symbolized by the inequality SP ≠ 0.
  • 10.  To symbolize O proposition.  The O proposition, “Some S is not P”, obverts to the logically equivalent to I propositions, “Some S is non-P”.  It is symbolized by the inequality SP ≠ 0.
  • 11.  The relationship between these propositions contradict each other in several ways, as can be illustrated here.
  • 12. This diagram shows that : 1. Contradictories 2. Contrary 3. Sub-Contrary 4. Sub-Alternation
  • 13.  Contradictory means they have opposite truth values.  A and O propositions are contradictory as are E and I proposition.  They are opposite of each other in both Quantity and Quality therefore, have opposite truth values.  When any Categorical statement is true, its partner across the diagonal is false.  When false its contradictory must be true.
  • 14. Example: if “all rubies are red stones” (A) is true, then “some rubies are not red stones” (O) must be false. Similarly if “no mammals are aquatic” (E) is false, then “some mammals are aquatic” (I) must be true.
  • 15.  A and E propositions are contrary.  Propositions are contrary when they cannot both be true. Example: An A proposition e.g. “all giraffes have long necks” cannot be true at the same time as the corresponding E proposition: “no giraffes have long necks”.  They are opposite in Quality only (both are universals). however that corresponding A and E proposition while contrary are not contradictory.
  • 16.  I and O propositions are Sub Contrary.  Propositions are Sub Contrary when it is impossible for both to false. Example: “some lunches are free” is false, “some lunches are not free” must be true. However that is possible for corresponding I and O both to be true.
  • 17. Example: “some nations are democratic” and “some nations are not democratic”. Again I and O propositions are sub contrary, but not contrary or contradictory
  • 18.  Sub alternation are same in Quality but different in Quantity.  From A to I ( is A is true then, the I is true).  From E to O ( if E is true then, O is true). Now for Falsity  From I to A ( if the I is false, then A is false).  From O to E (if O is false then, E is false).
  • 19. All S are P. No S are P. Some S are P. Some S are not P.
  • 20.  The Venn diagrams constitute an iconic representation of the standard form categorical propositions, in which spatial inclusions and exclusions correspond to the non-spatial inclusions and exclusions of classes.  They provide an exceptionally clear method of notation.