“SYMBOLIC
INTERACTIONISM”
Farhan Ahmad
Sociology Departnment
QAU Islamabad Pakistan
1
- Symbolic interaction theories focus on the
interpretation (social meaning) that is given to
behaviour, and on the way such interpretation
helps to construct the social world, the identities
of people, and, ultimately how they behave.
- All interaction theories are concerned with the
way in which meaning is constructed.
Symbolic Interaction Theories
2
1. Humans have capacity for thought.
2. Thought is shaped by social interaction.
3. Through interaction, people learn symbols
and meanings that allow them to think.
4. Meanings and symbols allow for human
action.
5. People can interpret a situation and modify
their action or interaction.
6. People can create own meanings.
7. Groups and societies are made up of patterns
of action and interaction.
Basic Principles
3
INTRODUCTION
 George Herbert Mead was born in South Hadley,
Massachusetts in February of 1863.
 In 1894 , Mead moved from The University of
Michigan to Chicago, Illinois, where he would
later become the center of the sociological
department at The University of Chicago.
4
INTRODUCTION CONT’D
 After Mead’s death in 1931 his students at the
University published his Mind, Self, and Society
teachings.
 Herbert Blumer, Mead’s pupil, further developed
his theory and coined it “Symbolic
Interactionism.”
5
INTRODUCTION CONT’D
 This theory is the process of interaction in the
formation of meanings for individuals.
 In simple form, people act based on symbolic
meanings they find within a given situation.
 The goals of our interactions are to create a
shared meaning.
6
EVOLUTION & PRAGMATISM
- Charles Darwin’s model provides the means of understanding and discovering all
behaviors, those of humans included.
- Mead’s attraction to Darwin rests on his emphasis on process, specifically, the idea
that process gives rise to different forms.
- Although Mead would become one of the key figures in the development of
pragmatism, he was initially introduced to it by John Dewey, William James, and
James Baldwin.
- “If Dewey gave range and vision, Mead gave analytical depth and scientific
precision.”
7
GEORGE ROBERT MEAD (1863-1931)
- Was born in Massachusetts and entered Oberlin College at the age of 16.
- After graduation, earned his graduate degree from Harvard.
- Taught philosophy and psychology at the University of Michigan. After 1893 taught
at the University of Chicago until his death.
- Believed people have the capacity to think and decide on their own how they should
act in certain situations.
- Their reactions are based on their perceptions and definitions of the
situation.
- People cope with the reality of things according to their comprehension of the
situation.
8
Mind, Self, and Society
- Views the mind as a process, a conversation within itself.
- People have the capacity to control their responses to the
environment.
- Self involves the process where actors reflect on themselves as objects.
- Develops from social forces and social experience.
- Society cannot exist without minds and self.
- Humans have ability to manipulate environment so multiple societies
exist.
The ‘I’ and ‘Me’
- I is source of creativity and spontaneity.
- Me is formed from the perceptions others’ actions and views, including own thoughts
on oneself.
9
Development of Self
1. Imitation stage- understanding gestures.
2. Play stage- learned use of language and meanings of certain symbols.
3. Game stage- understanding the roles of others and abiding by the rules.
The Act
1. Impulse- gut reactions or the need to do something.
2. Perception- use of senses and mental images to satisfy the impulse.
3. Manipulation- taking some conscious effort in regard of impulse.
4. Consummation- act of satisfying the impulse.
10
The Social Act and Gestures
- The stimulus creates an impulse that triggers possible reactions by people in the
environment.
- Mead emphasizes the importance of the vocal gesture (verbal communication).
- Shared language increases efficiency.
- Can hear ourselves talking, therefore carries same meaning between
listener and speaker.
11
 Herbert Blumer came up with three basic
principles for his theory.
 Meaning, Language, and Thought.
 These three principles lead to conclusions about
the creation of a persons self and socialization
into a larger community.
12
HERBERT BLUMER (1900-1987)
- Taught sociology at the University of Chicago from 1927 to 1952.
- Completed doctoral dissertation in 1928 under guidance of Ellsworth Faris, a disciple
of George Herbert Mead.
- Blumer was one of sociology’s most prominent and esteemed practitioners.
- Leading spokesperson for the Chicago style of symbolic
interactionism for an entire generation.
- Believed that humans construct their own actions and are free of internal drives.
- Additionally, actions are a consequence of reflexive and deliberate processes
determined by an individual in response to their environment.
13
BLUMER (CONT.)
Symbolic Interactionism
- is a term that was coined by Blumer in 1937.
- “humans act toward things on the basis of meanings” Blumer insisted its importance,
while peers downplayed it.
- Blumer views symbolic interactionism as “a uniquely human
process” one which we must completely understand through
language and gestures.
- Must share a language to communicate effectively.
- The importance of the fact that people act depending on meanings of objects for them,
which creates profound methodological implications.
14
BLUMER & SOCIAL THEORY
- Blumer’s focus was limited to theories grounded in empirical science.
- Acknowledged the role structure in human society:
- I.e. social roles, statues positions, rank orders, social codes, norms,
values, etc.
- Stated: “social interaction is obviously an interaction between people and not
between roles...”
- Theoretical schemes are essentially proposals as to the nature of relations between
persons and their social environments.
- Wrote Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change in an attempt to explain the role
of industrialization as a cause of social change.
- Published posthumously in 1990 by Maines and Morrione.
15
1ST
PRINCIPLE
 Meaning: “Making is a community project”
 Meaning is something that has to be assigned
and who assigns it?
 The definition of this word states that it is a
intention for a particular purpose or destination.
 Blumer says that the principle of meaning is
central in human behavior
16
MEANING CONT’D
 Meaning is based on human interaction
and how we act towards other people.
 We as humans, base things upon the
meanings that they have been given.
 An example would be me saying, “Hey you
look great, have you lost a lot of weight?”
This statement could be taken a lot of
different ways. Perhaps the person that I
said this to takes it in the way of a
compliment, (Which is what I was giving
them) or a negative remark. The meaning
that we assign to the statement is how we
react to people and what they say. 17
MEANING CONT’D
 This theory tells us that its how people interpret
messages and statements.
 Each one of us has a different meaning assigned
to different things.
 To us humans the word “grass” is something that
can be defined as green, or something needed to
be cut. To animals, the word “grass” could mean
shelter or food.
 Now in the case of symbols, meanings also
depend on the number of consensual responses of
those who use it. If someone uses a particular
word such as hey, to those that use it a lot, it
means hello. Now for those people that are
ambiguous to it, it could mean a totally different
thing to them. 18
2ND
PRINCIPLE
 Language: “Symbolic naming for the
human society”
 Language gives humans a means by
which to negotiate meaning through
symbols.
 Mead believed that when you named
something, it is assigned a meaning. An
example of this would be me naming my
dog Lucifer. The meaning of this name
would be the devil, because maybe the dog
is extremely mean or bites people all of
the time.
19
LANGUAGE
 In simple terms, this principle says that when we
talk to each other, symbolic interaction means
that humans identify meaning, or naming, and
then they develop discourse, which is
communication orally
20
3RD
PRINCIPLE
 Thought: “Interpretation of symbols”
 Thought is based on language. While in a
conversation, your mind is imagining or
thinking about the different points of view
or meanings to what the other person is
saying to you.
 What this means is that once your hear
someone say something, you
automatically start thinking about what
you are going to say next. 21
LANGUAGE
 Mead believes that “We naturally talk to
ourselves in order to sort out the meaning of a
difficult situation.”
 Whatever you think of before acting to an action
or responding to a phrase is your thought. We do
this all the time without knowing or realizing it.
It is your own personal meaning that you put on
words.
22
CONCLUSION
 George Herbert Mead was a professor
whose teachings were transformed into a
theory that is well known and taught
throughout the world.
 Symbolic Interactionism has only one
variable in it. The individual has its own
set of meanings for things and people.
 A problem with this theory is that it does
not state whether or not an individual
wants to win and get their own way or
not. Sometimes we think that people can
also construct a sample and ask someone
if they should have a certain meaning for
this and a meaning for that. 23
 This theory doesn’t tell you if you think
this way because a person told you to or if
you think a certain way because you feel
that you need to.
 George Herbert Mead died in 1931.
Although he never got around to
publishing his own teachings, he still is
considered to be one of the top sociological
theorists that have ever walked this
earth.
24
THOUGHT
 According to Blumer:
 We as humans have the ability to take the role of the
other.
 This allows us chances to find new meaning and different
perspectives in life.
25
TAKING THE ROLE OF THE OTHER
 This is seeing the world through another’s eyes.
 Walking in someone else’s shoes
 Grown up version of having imaginary friends
and talking to yourself.
26
TO CONCLUDE
 Symbolic Interactionism and its premises are built
upon communication between individuals.
 Language and Thought are vital in the interpretation
of symbols.
 We have and always will be affected by Language and
Thought.
27
APPLIED SYMBOLIC INTERACTION
28
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
 The characteristics of this approach are human
interaction, interpretation or definition rather
than mere reaction, response based on meaning,
use of symbols, and interpretation between
stimulus and response
 It is concerned with the interaction order of daily
life and experiences, rather than the structure.
29
SIX APPLICATIONS OF
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
 There are six different applications within the
theory of symbolic interactionism:
 creating reality
 meaning-ful research
 generalized other
 naming
 symbol manipulation
 the self-fulfilling prophecy
30
CREATING REALITY
 Sociologist Erving Goffman argues that everyone
is constantly negotiating with others to publicly
define our identity and the nature of the situation
in the creating reality application.
 The impression of reality is a delicate and fragile
thing that can be shattered.
31
MEANING-FUL RESEARCH
 In meaning-ful research, Mead claims that
research occurs through participant
observation.
 Mead believes that behavioral experimental
and survey research are void of the meaning
of the experience.
32
GENERALIZED OTHER
 Generalized other is described as the combined
mental image of others in a community, their
expectations, and possible responses to one’s
self.
 In symbolic interaction, there is a tragic
potential of negative responses consequently
reducing a person to perceiving themselves as
nothing.
 The generalized other is a combination of all of
the looking glass selves that others give us.
 The looking glass self is imaging how we look to
others.
33
NAMING
 Naming is what we would call name-calling,
such as retard, slut, liar, ugly, etc.
 Name-calling can be devastating because it
forces us to view ourselves through a warped
mirror.
 These grotesque images are not easily
dispelled and can be very hurtful and
damaging. This is shown in a clip from the
T.V. show South Park.
 http://youtube.com/watch?v=LGBYVnkSqis
34
SYMBOL MANIPULATION
 Symbol Manipulation is the process in which
symbols incite people to unite into action.
35
SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY
 Each and everyone of us affects how
others view themselves.
 Predictions in the self-fulfilling prophecy
may be false but made true by one’s
actions. One’s prophecy is simply a
possibility that is made into probability by
one’s unconscious or conscious actions.
 Our expectations evoke responses that
confirm what we originally anticipated,
resulting in a self-fulfilling prophecy.
36
37
THE PERSONALITY
STRUCTURE
 The outer layers are
the first to be
penetrated and include
more public
information.
 Gradual disclosure will
lead to more
understanding of each
individual.
 Once penetrated, it will
be easier to return to
inner layers.
Goals and
aspirations
Preferences in food,
music, clothes
Biographical
data
Religious
views
Deeply held fears
and fantasies Concept of
self
Source: Griffen, E. (2007). A first look at communication theory
(6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38
FOR THE EXAM...
Define these terms as they are used by symbolic interactionists:
- Presentation of self (Goffman): An identity that one presents to others in an attempt to manage their impression of him or her. We act a certain way so others
view us in this certain way.
- Dramaturgy (Goffman): Method of analyzing social interactions in the form of a play. We are the actors, we present ourselves in a specific way in the front
stage and act as we truly are in the back stage.
- Stigma (Goffman): Describes a mark of disgrace. Sometimes in physical form other times as poor personality traits (weak or dishonest).
- Emotion culture (Hochschild): A series of ideas about how and what people are supposed to experience in given situations.
Describe how Herbert Blumer defines the relationship between symbolic interactionism and social methodology.
- Symbolic interactionism is the idea that humans act toward objects on the basis of the meanings that the things have for them. And the meaning of the objects
is brought on by the social interaction with one’s peers. Blumer’s social methodology took a naturalistic approach (study of conduct and group life as these
occur in everyday existence). He also stressed the need for exploratory studies.
Describe the key perspective by which symbolic interactionists view society.
- The presentation of self and the fact that human communication, through gestures and language, and interaction often involve attempts to manage one’s image
and evironment.
What do sociologists gain by viewing society from the perspective of symbolic interactionism?
- Process of interaction is best-understood dimension of the social universe because of the social methodology. Social methodology allows researchers to be
flexible and form comprehensive acquaintance with a study that is unknown to them.
Describe one key limitation to the way that the symbolic interactionists view society.
- Ignores class structure and socioeconomic factors.
39

More Related Content

PPTX
Symbolic Interactionism
PPTX
Marxism presentation
PDF
symbolic interactionism theory
PDF
Symbolic Interactionism by George Herbert Mead
PPTX
Structural functionalism
PPTX
Structural Functionalism
PPT
Symbolic interactionism
PPTX
social structure
Symbolic Interactionism
Marxism presentation
symbolic interactionism theory
Symbolic Interactionism by George Herbert Mead
Structural functionalism
Structural Functionalism
Symbolic interactionism
social structure

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Symbolic interactionism
PPTX
Symbolic Interactionism
PPTX
Symbolic interaction theory
PPTX
Structural functionalism
PPTX
Major theoretical perspectives in sociology
PPTX
Emile Durkheim, Sociologist ppt
PPTX
Rational Choice Theory
PPTX
Structural-Functionalism-Theory.pptx
PPT
Sociological Theory
PDF
The three main sociological perspectives
PPT
Functionalist Social Theory
PPT
Pioneers of sociology
PPTX
The sociological imagination
PPTX
Symbolic Interactionism, Structural-Functional Theory and Conflict Theory
PPT
Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology
PPT
Functionalism
PPT
George Herbert Mead
PPTX
Emile Durkheim
PPTX
Conflict theory
PDF
Topic 5 diss- marxism
Symbolic interactionism
Symbolic Interactionism
Symbolic interaction theory
Structural functionalism
Major theoretical perspectives in sociology
Emile Durkheim, Sociologist ppt
Rational Choice Theory
Structural-Functionalism-Theory.pptx
Sociological Theory
The three main sociological perspectives
Functionalist Social Theory
Pioneers of sociology
The sociological imagination
Symbolic Interactionism, Structural-Functional Theory and Conflict Theory
Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology
Functionalism
George Herbert Mead
Emile Durkheim
Conflict theory
Topic 5 diss- marxism
Ad

Viewers also liked (16)

PPT
Social Self
KEY
Symbolic Interactionism
PPTX
Karl marks power point presentation
PPTX
Dialectical Materialism
PPTX
Theory of class conflict
PPTX
Important people in sociology
PPTX
Structural Functionalism
PPT
Is Sociology Science?
PPTX
Conflict Theory
PPTX
Conflict and functionalist theory
PPT
Conflict Theory
PPTX
Symbolic Interaction Theory
PPT
Symbolic interactionsim
PPTX
Karl Marx
PPT
Introduction to sociology
PDF
clinic database and software management system
Social Self
Symbolic Interactionism
Karl marks power point presentation
Dialectical Materialism
Theory of class conflict
Important people in sociology
Structural Functionalism
Is Sociology Science?
Conflict Theory
Conflict and functionalist theory
Conflict Theory
Symbolic Interaction Theory
Symbolic interactionsim
Karl Marx
Introduction to sociology
clinic database and software management system
Ad

Similar to Symbollic interactionism in Sociology (20)

PPTX
Muhammad Shahzad Ashfaq
PPTX
Symbolic-Interactionism.pptx
PPTX
Symbolic Interactionism CHAPTER THREE (1).pptx
PDF
Introduction to communication theories lecture 7
PPTX
JAMERO-MAEDREPORT.pptx
PPTX
Symbolics-InteractionaJHGTHDYTDYDlism.pptx
PPT
SYMBOLIC-INTERACTIONISM.ppt
PPTX
Interpersonal Communication
PPTX
Mead and Symbolic Interaction.pptx
PPTX
Herbert blumer
PPTX
Lesson 3- Symbolic Interactionism .pptx
PPTX
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
DOCX
Qs for help group A Aim for 500 words minimum,and for 300 wor.docx
PPTX
Interactionist Theory
PPT
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
PPTX
Symbolic-Interactionism-Report_124228.pptx
PPTX
Socialization
PPTX
Herbert Blumer -Jibin Roji.pptx
PPTX
Lesson 2 and 3_UTS.pptx understanding the self
PPTX
Symbolic Interactionalism.pptx ippppppppppppp
Muhammad Shahzad Ashfaq
Symbolic-Interactionism.pptx
Symbolic Interactionism CHAPTER THREE (1).pptx
Introduction to communication theories lecture 7
JAMERO-MAEDREPORT.pptx
Symbolics-InteractionaJHGTHDYTDYDlism.pptx
SYMBOLIC-INTERACTIONISM.ppt
Interpersonal Communication
Mead and Symbolic Interaction.pptx
Herbert blumer
Lesson 3- Symbolic Interactionism .pptx
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Qs for help group A Aim for 500 words minimum,and for 300 wor.docx
Interactionist Theory
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Symbolic-Interactionism-Report_124228.pptx
Socialization
Herbert Blumer -Jibin Roji.pptx
Lesson 2 and 3_UTS.pptx understanding the self
Symbolic Interactionalism.pptx ippppppppppppp

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY chapter 1-what is social psychology and its definition
PDF
Glycolysis by Rishikanta Usham, Dhanamanjuri University
PPTX
23ME402 Materials and Metallurgy- PPT.pptx
PPT
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS (Electrochemical processes )-1.ppt
PPT
dcs-computertraningbasics-170826004702.ppt
PDF
Unit Four Lesson in Carbohydrates chemistry
PDF
Thyroid Hormone by Iqra Nasir detail.pdf
PPTX
Spectroscopic Techniques for M Tech Civil Engineerin .pptx
PDF
BCKIC FOUNDATION_MAY-JUNE 2025_NEWSLETTER
PDF
2024_PohleJellKlug_CambrianPlectronoceratidsAustralia.pdf
PDF
Telemedicine: Transforming Healthcare Delivery in Remote Areas (www.kiu.ac.ug)
PPTX
Chromosomal Aberrations Dr. Thirunahari Ugandhar.pptx
PPTX
BPharm_Hospital_Organization_Complete_PPT.pptx
PPTX
The Female Reproductive System - Grade 10 ppt
PPT
Chapter 52 introductory biology course Camp
PDF
Sustainable Biology- Scopes, Principles of sustainiability, Sustainable Resou...
PDF
TOPIC-1-Introduction-to-Bioinformatics_for dummies
PDF
2019UpdateAHAASAAISGuidelineSlideDeckrevisedADL12919.pdf
PDF
final prehhhejjehehhehehehebesentation.pdf
PDF
SWAG Research Lab Scientific Publications
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY chapter 1-what is social psychology and its definition
Glycolysis by Rishikanta Usham, Dhanamanjuri University
23ME402 Materials and Metallurgy- PPT.pptx
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS (Electrochemical processes )-1.ppt
dcs-computertraningbasics-170826004702.ppt
Unit Four Lesson in Carbohydrates chemistry
Thyroid Hormone by Iqra Nasir detail.pdf
Spectroscopic Techniques for M Tech Civil Engineerin .pptx
BCKIC FOUNDATION_MAY-JUNE 2025_NEWSLETTER
2024_PohleJellKlug_CambrianPlectronoceratidsAustralia.pdf
Telemedicine: Transforming Healthcare Delivery in Remote Areas (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Chromosomal Aberrations Dr. Thirunahari Ugandhar.pptx
BPharm_Hospital_Organization_Complete_PPT.pptx
The Female Reproductive System - Grade 10 ppt
Chapter 52 introductory biology course Camp
Sustainable Biology- Scopes, Principles of sustainiability, Sustainable Resou...
TOPIC-1-Introduction-to-Bioinformatics_for dummies
2019UpdateAHAASAAISGuidelineSlideDeckrevisedADL12919.pdf
final prehhhejjehehhehehehebesentation.pdf
SWAG Research Lab Scientific Publications

Symbollic interactionism in Sociology

  • 2. - Symbolic interaction theories focus on the interpretation (social meaning) that is given to behaviour, and on the way such interpretation helps to construct the social world, the identities of people, and, ultimately how they behave. - All interaction theories are concerned with the way in which meaning is constructed. Symbolic Interaction Theories 2
  • 3. 1. Humans have capacity for thought. 2. Thought is shaped by social interaction. 3. Through interaction, people learn symbols and meanings that allow them to think. 4. Meanings and symbols allow for human action. 5. People can interpret a situation and modify their action or interaction. 6. People can create own meanings. 7. Groups and societies are made up of patterns of action and interaction. Basic Principles 3
  • 4. INTRODUCTION  George Herbert Mead was born in South Hadley, Massachusetts in February of 1863.  In 1894 , Mead moved from The University of Michigan to Chicago, Illinois, where he would later become the center of the sociological department at The University of Chicago. 4
  • 5. INTRODUCTION CONT’D  After Mead’s death in 1931 his students at the University published his Mind, Self, and Society teachings.  Herbert Blumer, Mead’s pupil, further developed his theory and coined it “Symbolic Interactionism.” 5
  • 6. INTRODUCTION CONT’D  This theory is the process of interaction in the formation of meanings for individuals.  In simple form, people act based on symbolic meanings they find within a given situation.  The goals of our interactions are to create a shared meaning. 6
  • 7. EVOLUTION & PRAGMATISM - Charles Darwin’s model provides the means of understanding and discovering all behaviors, those of humans included. - Mead’s attraction to Darwin rests on his emphasis on process, specifically, the idea that process gives rise to different forms. - Although Mead would become one of the key figures in the development of pragmatism, he was initially introduced to it by John Dewey, William James, and James Baldwin. - “If Dewey gave range and vision, Mead gave analytical depth and scientific precision.” 7
  • 8. GEORGE ROBERT MEAD (1863-1931) - Was born in Massachusetts and entered Oberlin College at the age of 16. - After graduation, earned his graduate degree from Harvard. - Taught philosophy and psychology at the University of Michigan. After 1893 taught at the University of Chicago until his death. - Believed people have the capacity to think and decide on their own how they should act in certain situations. - Their reactions are based on their perceptions and definitions of the situation. - People cope with the reality of things according to their comprehension of the situation. 8
  • 9. Mind, Self, and Society - Views the mind as a process, a conversation within itself. - People have the capacity to control their responses to the environment. - Self involves the process where actors reflect on themselves as objects. - Develops from social forces and social experience. - Society cannot exist without minds and self. - Humans have ability to manipulate environment so multiple societies exist. The ‘I’ and ‘Me’ - I is source of creativity and spontaneity. - Me is formed from the perceptions others’ actions and views, including own thoughts on oneself. 9
  • 10. Development of Self 1. Imitation stage- understanding gestures. 2. Play stage- learned use of language and meanings of certain symbols. 3. Game stage- understanding the roles of others and abiding by the rules. The Act 1. Impulse- gut reactions or the need to do something. 2. Perception- use of senses and mental images to satisfy the impulse. 3. Manipulation- taking some conscious effort in regard of impulse. 4. Consummation- act of satisfying the impulse. 10
  • 11. The Social Act and Gestures - The stimulus creates an impulse that triggers possible reactions by people in the environment. - Mead emphasizes the importance of the vocal gesture (verbal communication). - Shared language increases efficiency. - Can hear ourselves talking, therefore carries same meaning between listener and speaker. 11
  • 12.  Herbert Blumer came up with three basic principles for his theory.  Meaning, Language, and Thought.  These three principles lead to conclusions about the creation of a persons self and socialization into a larger community. 12
  • 13. HERBERT BLUMER (1900-1987) - Taught sociology at the University of Chicago from 1927 to 1952. - Completed doctoral dissertation in 1928 under guidance of Ellsworth Faris, a disciple of George Herbert Mead. - Blumer was one of sociology’s most prominent and esteemed practitioners. - Leading spokesperson for the Chicago style of symbolic interactionism for an entire generation. - Believed that humans construct their own actions and are free of internal drives. - Additionally, actions are a consequence of reflexive and deliberate processes determined by an individual in response to their environment. 13
  • 14. BLUMER (CONT.) Symbolic Interactionism - is a term that was coined by Blumer in 1937. - “humans act toward things on the basis of meanings” Blumer insisted its importance, while peers downplayed it. - Blumer views symbolic interactionism as “a uniquely human process” one which we must completely understand through language and gestures. - Must share a language to communicate effectively. - The importance of the fact that people act depending on meanings of objects for them, which creates profound methodological implications. 14
  • 15. BLUMER & SOCIAL THEORY - Blumer’s focus was limited to theories grounded in empirical science. - Acknowledged the role structure in human society: - I.e. social roles, statues positions, rank orders, social codes, norms, values, etc. - Stated: “social interaction is obviously an interaction between people and not between roles...” - Theoretical schemes are essentially proposals as to the nature of relations between persons and their social environments. - Wrote Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change in an attempt to explain the role of industrialization as a cause of social change. - Published posthumously in 1990 by Maines and Morrione. 15
  • 16. 1ST PRINCIPLE  Meaning: “Making is a community project”  Meaning is something that has to be assigned and who assigns it?  The definition of this word states that it is a intention for a particular purpose or destination.  Blumer says that the principle of meaning is central in human behavior 16
  • 17. MEANING CONT’D  Meaning is based on human interaction and how we act towards other people.  We as humans, base things upon the meanings that they have been given.  An example would be me saying, “Hey you look great, have you lost a lot of weight?” This statement could be taken a lot of different ways. Perhaps the person that I said this to takes it in the way of a compliment, (Which is what I was giving them) or a negative remark. The meaning that we assign to the statement is how we react to people and what they say. 17
  • 18. MEANING CONT’D  This theory tells us that its how people interpret messages and statements.  Each one of us has a different meaning assigned to different things.  To us humans the word “grass” is something that can be defined as green, or something needed to be cut. To animals, the word “grass” could mean shelter or food.  Now in the case of symbols, meanings also depend on the number of consensual responses of those who use it. If someone uses a particular word such as hey, to those that use it a lot, it means hello. Now for those people that are ambiguous to it, it could mean a totally different thing to them. 18
  • 19. 2ND PRINCIPLE  Language: “Symbolic naming for the human society”  Language gives humans a means by which to negotiate meaning through symbols.  Mead believed that when you named something, it is assigned a meaning. An example of this would be me naming my dog Lucifer. The meaning of this name would be the devil, because maybe the dog is extremely mean or bites people all of the time. 19
  • 20. LANGUAGE  In simple terms, this principle says that when we talk to each other, symbolic interaction means that humans identify meaning, or naming, and then they develop discourse, which is communication orally 20
  • 21. 3RD PRINCIPLE  Thought: “Interpretation of symbols”  Thought is based on language. While in a conversation, your mind is imagining or thinking about the different points of view or meanings to what the other person is saying to you.  What this means is that once your hear someone say something, you automatically start thinking about what you are going to say next. 21
  • 22. LANGUAGE  Mead believes that “We naturally talk to ourselves in order to sort out the meaning of a difficult situation.”  Whatever you think of before acting to an action or responding to a phrase is your thought. We do this all the time without knowing or realizing it. It is your own personal meaning that you put on words. 22
  • 23. CONCLUSION  George Herbert Mead was a professor whose teachings were transformed into a theory that is well known and taught throughout the world.  Symbolic Interactionism has only one variable in it. The individual has its own set of meanings for things and people.  A problem with this theory is that it does not state whether or not an individual wants to win and get their own way or not. Sometimes we think that people can also construct a sample and ask someone if they should have a certain meaning for this and a meaning for that. 23
  • 24.  This theory doesn’t tell you if you think this way because a person told you to or if you think a certain way because you feel that you need to.  George Herbert Mead died in 1931. Although he never got around to publishing his own teachings, he still is considered to be one of the top sociological theorists that have ever walked this earth. 24
  • 25. THOUGHT  According to Blumer:  We as humans have the ability to take the role of the other.  This allows us chances to find new meaning and different perspectives in life. 25
  • 26. TAKING THE ROLE OF THE OTHER  This is seeing the world through another’s eyes.  Walking in someone else’s shoes  Grown up version of having imaginary friends and talking to yourself. 26
  • 27. TO CONCLUDE  Symbolic Interactionism and its premises are built upon communication between individuals.  Language and Thought are vital in the interpretation of symbols.  We have and always will be affected by Language and Thought. 27
  • 29. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM  The characteristics of this approach are human interaction, interpretation or definition rather than mere reaction, response based on meaning, use of symbols, and interpretation between stimulus and response  It is concerned with the interaction order of daily life and experiences, rather than the structure. 29
  • 30. SIX APPLICATIONS OF SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM  There are six different applications within the theory of symbolic interactionism:  creating reality  meaning-ful research  generalized other  naming  symbol manipulation  the self-fulfilling prophecy 30
  • 31. CREATING REALITY  Sociologist Erving Goffman argues that everyone is constantly negotiating with others to publicly define our identity and the nature of the situation in the creating reality application.  The impression of reality is a delicate and fragile thing that can be shattered. 31
  • 32. MEANING-FUL RESEARCH  In meaning-ful research, Mead claims that research occurs through participant observation.  Mead believes that behavioral experimental and survey research are void of the meaning of the experience. 32
  • 33. GENERALIZED OTHER  Generalized other is described as the combined mental image of others in a community, their expectations, and possible responses to one’s self.  In symbolic interaction, there is a tragic potential of negative responses consequently reducing a person to perceiving themselves as nothing.  The generalized other is a combination of all of the looking glass selves that others give us.  The looking glass self is imaging how we look to others. 33
  • 34. NAMING  Naming is what we would call name-calling, such as retard, slut, liar, ugly, etc.  Name-calling can be devastating because it forces us to view ourselves through a warped mirror.  These grotesque images are not easily dispelled and can be very hurtful and damaging. This is shown in a clip from the T.V. show South Park.  http://youtube.com/watch?v=LGBYVnkSqis 34
  • 35. SYMBOL MANIPULATION  Symbol Manipulation is the process in which symbols incite people to unite into action. 35
  • 36. SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY  Each and everyone of us affects how others view themselves.  Predictions in the self-fulfilling prophecy may be false but made true by one’s actions. One’s prophecy is simply a possibility that is made into probability by one’s unconscious or conscious actions.  Our expectations evoke responses that confirm what we originally anticipated, resulting in a self-fulfilling prophecy. 36
  • 37. 37
  • 38. THE PERSONALITY STRUCTURE  The outer layers are the first to be penetrated and include more public information.  Gradual disclosure will lead to more understanding of each individual.  Once penetrated, it will be easier to return to inner layers. Goals and aspirations Preferences in food, music, clothes Biographical data Religious views Deeply held fears and fantasies Concept of self Source: Griffen, E. (2007). A first look at communication theory (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 38
  • 39. FOR THE EXAM... Define these terms as they are used by symbolic interactionists: - Presentation of self (Goffman): An identity that one presents to others in an attempt to manage their impression of him or her. We act a certain way so others view us in this certain way. - Dramaturgy (Goffman): Method of analyzing social interactions in the form of a play. We are the actors, we present ourselves in a specific way in the front stage and act as we truly are in the back stage. - Stigma (Goffman): Describes a mark of disgrace. Sometimes in physical form other times as poor personality traits (weak or dishonest). - Emotion culture (Hochschild): A series of ideas about how and what people are supposed to experience in given situations. Describe how Herbert Blumer defines the relationship between symbolic interactionism and social methodology. - Symbolic interactionism is the idea that humans act toward objects on the basis of the meanings that the things have for them. And the meaning of the objects is brought on by the social interaction with one’s peers. Blumer’s social methodology took a naturalistic approach (study of conduct and group life as these occur in everyday existence). He also stressed the need for exploratory studies. Describe the key perspective by which symbolic interactionists view society. - The presentation of self and the fact that human communication, through gestures and language, and interaction often involve attempts to manage one’s image and evironment. What do sociologists gain by viewing society from the perspective of symbolic interactionism? - Process of interaction is best-understood dimension of the social universe because of the social methodology. Social methodology allows researchers to be flexible and form comprehensive acquaintance with a study that is unknown to them. Describe one key limitation to the way that the symbolic interactionists view society. - Ignores class structure and socioeconomic factors. 39