improve the performance of schools as well as the pupils.
The figure below will be the test map of the study which includes its input, the process and output. The figure shows that the study is focused on identifying the relationship of the profiles of the primary grade teachers on their awareness and preparedness of using Strategic Intervention Material using the instruments and interpreting the data. The procedure will be within the use of descriptive method which shall be done by interpreting the relationship of the profiles of teachers and their awareness and preparedness of using SIM; the relationship of the awareness and preparedness of using SIM and the performance of the school in terms of the National Achievement Result. The result will be the basis of the improvement of planning and implementing programs of the school and the Division to better serve its stakeholders.
Figure 1. Paradigm of the Study
Statement of the Problem
The study will sought to answer the following questions:
1. How are the primary grade level teachers of District 10 described in terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Gender
1.3. Marital Status
1.4. Educational Attainment
1.5. Religion
1.6. Length of Service in the Teaching Profession
1.7. Trainings and Seminars Attended
1.8. Position and Designation in their Respective Schools?
2. How are the practices of primary grade level teachers in District 10 described in terms of:
2.1. Awareness of the Strategic Intervention Materials
2.2. Preparedness in using Strategic Intervention Materials
2.3. Approaches and Strategies in Teaching
2.4. Assessment, Instruments and Techniques
2.5. Interventions?
3. What factors affect the primary grade level teachers from using or not using Strategic Intervention Materials?
4. How do the personal profiles of the primary grade level teachers influence their awareness and preparedness in implementing SIM?
5. How do their awareness and preparedness of implementing SIM affect the school performance in National Achievement Test?
Hypothesis
The study will test the foregoing null hypothesis:
1. There is no significant relationship on the personal profile of the primary and elementary teachers of District 10 on their awareness and preparedness of implementing Strategic Intervention Materials.
2. There is no significant relationship on the awareness and preparedness of teachers in implementing SIM with the performance of the school in National Achievement Test.
3. The practices of the primary and elementary teachers of District 10 have no significant relationships on their awareness and preparedness of implementing SIM..
Scope and Limitation of the Study
The study will focus on the awareness and preparedness of primary grade teachers in implementing Strategic Intervention Materials. The awareness and preparedness of implementing SIM will be categorized into five levels namely: 1 – Not at all aware; 2 – Slightly aware; 3 – Somewhat aware; 4 – Moderately aware and; 5 – Ex