The regulation of Nicotine-Containing Products (NCPs)
12 November 2013
Jeremy Mean
Outline

• Regulation of Nicotine Containing Products (NCPs)
• UK Government policy

• EU Tobacco Products Directive

2
Regulation of NCPs in the UK
• NRT, licensed medicine since the 1970s,
• Expert Working Group in 2005

• Every strength/form available non-prescription
• Flexible framework rather than fixed criteria
• Objective to enable safe and effective products to
meet public health aims
3
All of these products contain nicotine
4
NCPs
regulated by MHRA

These products are
NOT regulated by MHRA

All of these products contain nicotine
5
Developing electronic cigarette
market

6
Challenge for regulation
• To enable safe and effective products
• Not to ban potentially useful ones
• To listen to stakeholders
• To protect and promote public health

7
Public consultation
• Growing concerns about safety and quality of
products on the UK market
• Harm reduction approach to smoking
“..to assist smokers who are unwilling or unable
to smoke, and as a safer alternative to smoking
for smokers and those around them”

8
Outcome of consultation
Against MHRA regulation For MHRA regulation
Some importers
ASH, Medical
professional
Users of NCPs
bodies, NHS,
Pharma, tobacco
trading standards
some importers

9
Working with stakeholders
Public health
bodies

Across UK
Government

Researchers

MHRA

Pharmaceutical
industry

E-Cig
industry

10
Research
• Investigation of the levels of nicotine
• The nature, quality and safety of unlicensed NCPs
• The actual use of unlicensed NCPs in the marketplace

• The efficacy of unlicensed NCPs in smoking cessation
• The potential impact of bringing NCPs into medicines
regulation on public health outcomes
11
Summary of main findings
• Variable nicotine levels - labels and batches
• Variable nicotine delivery

• Unlicensed NCPs fail to meet standards of safety, quality
and efficacy
• Most NCP used to support stop smoking or harm reduction
• Limited evidence of effectiveness

• GPSD regulation does not serve public health objective
12
Medicines regulation
• Proportionate licensing regime
• Labelling and product information

• Sale and Supply
• Advertising controls
• Safety monitoring

• Risk management tools
13
OTC medicines market – highly
competitive, FMCG

14
OTC branded and own brand
products even in small markets

15
OTC medicines market

16
Safety issues
• Yellow card Vs media reports
• Relative risk:benefit
- For smokers
- For never smokers
• Gateway?
• Smoking maintenance?
17
European proposals on NCPs
• Part of wider Tobacco Products Directive

• Nicotine threshold approach
• Medicines licence required for some
products
• Warnings for others

18
EP Position on NCPs
• NCPs medicines by presentation
• For others
– Some controls like tobacco ones
– Some controls like medicines ones
• Conflicting provisions
• Does not amount to a regime capable to protecting and
promoting public health
• Inflexible and unresponsive requirements
• Fails to “future proof”

19
UK Government position
• Medicines framework for NCPs serves public
health objectives
• MHRA stands ready to license NCPs now (by
presentation)
• Supporting true innovation, diversity, appeal

• Support Europe wide certainty on legal position on
NCPs as medicines
20
The regulation of Nicotine-Containing Products (NCPs)
12 November 2013
Jeremy Mean

The Regulation of Nicotine-Containing Products - Jeremy Mean - E-Cigarette Summit UK

  • 1.
    The regulation ofNicotine-Containing Products (NCPs) 12 November 2013 Jeremy Mean
  • 2.
    Outline • Regulation ofNicotine Containing Products (NCPs) • UK Government policy • EU Tobacco Products Directive 2
  • 3.
    Regulation of NCPsin the UK • NRT, licensed medicine since the 1970s, • Expert Working Group in 2005 • Every strength/form available non-prescription • Flexible framework rather than fixed criteria • Objective to enable safe and effective products to meet public health aims 3
  • 4.
    All of theseproducts contain nicotine 4
  • 5.
    NCPs regulated by MHRA Theseproducts are NOT regulated by MHRA All of these products contain nicotine 5
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Challenge for regulation •To enable safe and effective products • Not to ban potentially useful ones • To listen to stakeholders • To protect and promote public health 7
  • 8.
    Public consultation • Growingconcerns about safety and quality of products on the UK market • Harm reduction approach to smoking “..to assist smokers who are unwilling or unable to smoke, and as a safer alternative to smoking for smokers and those around them” 8
  • 9.
    Outcome of consultation AgainstMHRA regulation For MHRA regulation Some importers ASH, Medical professional Users of NCPs bodies, NHS, Pharma, tobacco trading standards some importers 9
  • 10.
    Working with stakeholders Publichealth bodies Across UK Government Researchers MHRA Pharmaceutical industry E-Cig industry 10
  • 11.
    Research • Investigation ofthe levels of nicotine • The nature, quality and safety of unlicensed NCPs • The actual use of unlicensed NCPs in the marketplace • The efficacy of unlicensed NCPs in smoking cessation • The potential impact of bringing NCPs into medicines regulation on public health outcomes 11
  • 12.
    Summary of mainfindings • Variable nicotine levels - labels and batches • Variable nicotine delivery • Unlicensed NCPs fail to meet standards of safety, quality and efficacy • Most NCP used to support stop smoking or harm reduction • Limited evidence of effectiveness • GPSD regulation does not serve public health objective 12
  • 13.
    Medicines regulation • Proportionatelicensing regime • Labelling and product information • Sale and Supply • Advertising controls • Safety monitoring • Risk management tools 13
  • 14.
    OTC medicines market– highly competitive, FMCG 14
  • 15.
    OTC branded andown brand products even in small markets 15
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Safety issues • Yellowcard Vs media reports • Relative risk:benefit - For smokers - For never smokers • Gateway? • Smoking maintenance? 17
  • 18.
    European proposals onNCPs • Part of wider Tobacco Products Directive • Nicotine threshold approach • Medicines licence required for some products • Warnings for others 18
  • 19.
    EP Position onNCPs • NCPs medicines by presentation • For others – Some controls like tobacco ones – Some controls like medicines ones • Conflicting provisions • Does not amount to a regime capable to protecting and promoting public health • Inflexible and unresponsive requirements • Fails to “future proof” 19
  • 20.
    UK Government position •Medicines framework for NCPs serves public health objectives • MHRA stands ready to license NCPs now (by presentation) • Supporting true innovation, diversity, appeal • Support Europe wide certainty on legal position on NCPs as medicines 20
  • 21.
    The regulation ofNicotine-Containing Products (NCPs) 12 November 2013 Jeremy Mean