Journal of Education and Practice                                                             www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol 3, No 1, 2012




        The Role of Teacher and Technology in Perspective of
                        Classroom Teaching
                                 K.Venkat Satish (Corresponding Author)
   Mother Teresa Institute of Science and Technology, Kotturu-Sattupally, Khammam-507303 , Andhra
                                               Pradesh-India
                                  Email: Kodhmuri.satish72@gmail.com


                                        Boggavarapu Krishna Priya
                         Zilla Parishad Secondary School, Dammapeta-Khammam
Abstract
Classroom teaching is a demanding job. Teacher spends most of his time in teaching. Teacher is responsible
for many tasks in the classroom teaching. Teacher plans and implement the instructions. He plays the role
of managers, psychologists, counselors, custodians, communicators, social ambassadors and entertainers.
Sometimes teacher becomes disillusion and frustration while performing the multi tasks because the
classroom demands, distracts and challenges the teacher to use new tools to brush up the key concepts and
skills in regarding Science, Social Studies, Art and other curriculum standards. He tries to focus on
effective teaching with the help of new tools. The practice of new tools able the students to read, reason,
powerful writing, communicate productively with global community and conduct thoughtful research. The
teacher faces the success in the right implementation of tools i.e. technology. Now a day the integration of
technology in teaching and learning process has become a perennial one. Technology liberates to
reestablish the role and value of the individual classroom teacher. The two things are compulsory for the
usage of technology “first the perspective of the classroom must change to become learner centered, second,
students and teachers must enter into a collaboration or partnership with technology in order to create a
“community” that nurtures, encourages and supports the learning process” (Cognition and Technology
Group at Vanderbilt). This paper focuses on the relation between teacher and the technology in the
classroom teaching.


Introduction
In teaching and learning, technology should apply as a process rather than as a single, isolated and discrete
activity. The American Heritage Dictionary defines process as “a series of action, changes, and functions
bringing about a result” (AHD). Technology in education is not a mere object to introduce into teaching and
learning activities without considering basic principles of learning and sound teaching methodology.
Technology is an object that can be used at any time. Technology in education is guided by learning
principles and individuals. It retains the knowledge and required skills. Technology satisfies the student’s
expectations of the outcome of learning, application of knowledge, enrich practical life experiences.
Technology in Education is often considered, erroneously, as synonymous with instructional innovation.
Saetler argues that “educators are correct to resist mere innovation, but they should welcome educational
                                                     49
Journal of Education and Practice                                                               www.iiste.org
    ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
    Vol 3, No 1, 2012

    technology” (1). Submission of technology helps the teacher in sound teaching, learning principles, avoids
    teaching hardware, out come of conventional mode of teaching, and helps to deliver instructions coherently.
    The integration of technology with education grounds the sound practice. Fletcher says:


                      When you go to the hardware store to buy a drill, you don’t actually want a drill,
                       you want a hole, they don’t sell holes at the hardware store, but they do sell drill,
                      which are the technology used to make holes. We must not lose sight that technology
                      for the part is a tool and it should be   used in applications which address educations
                      concerns (87).


    In many schools, teachers are isolated from each other and preoccupied; Fullan calls “the daily press” of
    getting through their schedule. The implementation of technology in the classroom brings creative
    exploration, invention and testing. It breaks down the conventional atmosphere of isolate teaching and
    boredom. Technology facilitates the work of teams and provides ample time for all round development. The
    teacher can spend much time and bring innovative changes in the teaching methodology. Gardening
    provides a useful metaphor for this process. We will see more growth if we cultivate the soil and fertilize
    before planting. An exclusive focus on skills and software is a bit like spreading seeds across a concrete
    playground. Henry Becker presents his research in this context that “the preferred teaching strategies and
    styles of teachers usually determine or shape the patterns of technology usage. He says “traditional”
    teachers are far less apt to allow students to use new technologies than “constructivist” teachers even when
    they have networked computers in their classrooms.”


             The scope of implementing technology is examined with a view of showing its relation with
    pedagogy. Technology should be used to facilitate learning in the part of the instructional process. It should
    include theories about technology integration and the application of research findings. Teachers should
    select the desired technologies, skills to demonstrate the selected technologies, skills to evaluate
    technologies, skills to customize and skills to address instructional problems to the students. The objective
    and method of instruction include technology and outcomes of instruction. Diaz and Bontembal say:


                      Using technology to enhance the educational process involves more than just
                      learning how to use specific piece of hardware and software. It requires an
                      understanding of pedagogical principles that are specific to the use of technology
                      in an instructional settings … pedagogy- based training begins by helping teachers
                      understand the role of learning theory in the design and function of class activities
                      and in the selection and use of instructional technologies (2-6).


Technology in education is commonly used to enhance the instructions by the facilitator in the classroom.
According to Lever-Duffy, McDonald and Mizell “educational technology might include media, models,
projected and non-projected visual, as well as audio, video and digital media” and are likely to “confine

                                                           50
Journal of Education and Practice                                                                                  www.iiste.org
      ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
      Vol 3, No 1, 2012

educational technology primarily to computers, computer peripheral and related software used for teaching and
learning” (4-5).


                Technology helps the teachers to improve their productivity and professional practice. While
creating electronic documents, they can consider a variety of purposes and audiences, and effectively share
information locally and globally. Through the use of educational technology, teachers can present and assess
student work and communicate more easily with parents. The following table exhibits the productivity and
professional practice by the teacher with the help of technology:
        Competency                              Initial                   Developing                            Proficient
 A.      Use         educational   I   create       electronic      I      use      desktop       I use technology to communicate and
 technology                   to   documents               using    publishing             and    collaborate with students, parents and
 communicate/collaborate           word            processing       multimedia tools to           colleagues.
 with students,          parents   software                   as    create newsletters,
 and teachers.                     instructional                    brochure               and
                                   materials                 and    presentations.
                                   assessments tasks.
 B. Use online resources           I      use     e-mail      to    I search the Internet         I   incorporate     online      courses,
 to communicate/                   communicate on a                 and                  online   distance    learning   and/or     video
 Collaborate with school           regular        basis      and    resources to locate           conferencing as instructional tools.
 community            (students,   search the Internet for          and             retrieve
 parents & teachers) and           curriculum             related   curriculum-related
 global community.                 information.                     information.
 C. Use technology to              I use technology tools           I use data to assist          I use different applications to collect
 collect and manage date           such as spreadsheets             in making sound               and manage data as an internal part
 related to teaching and           and       databases        to    educational                   of my classroom management.
 learning.                         collect and manage               decisions regarding
                                   data.                            classroom
                                                                    management.
 D.    Identify,      use   and    I consistently look for          I align new skills            I experiment with new concepts and
 evaluate technology to            opportunities to learn           with         curriculum       pilot      new    practices,      using
 support       the      learning   about new software               strategies              for   technology for ongoing, embedded
 process for all students          applications and skills          integration            and    professional development.
 through                ongoing    that         expand       my     share        ideas     and
 professional                      working         knowledge        resources             with
 development.                      technology                and    colleagues.
                                   promote                  best
                                   practices.
      It is very important for teachers to use a variety of teaching methods to evaluate and modify their students.
      Teachers engage students in an exploratory learning experience which is designed to stimulate thinking.
      Bruner states:
                                                                        51
Journal of Education and Practice                                                                www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol 3, No 1, 2012


                  To instruct someone … is not a matter of getting him to commit results to mind.
                  Rather, it is to teach him to participate in the process that makes possible the
                  establishment of knowledge. We teach a subject not to produce little living libraries
                  on that subject, but rather to get a student to think mathematically for himself, to consider
                  matters as historian does, to take part in the process of knowledge-getting. Knowing is a
                  process not a product (72).


Teacher explores the process of technology and searches the ways to accomplish his teaching effectively. It
develops the rationale to examine the appropriateness of using technology are companionable with the
lesson plan and learning outcomes. The process of exploring the relationship between technologies is on the
part of teachers. Mezirow argues:


                  Thinking critically involves our recognizing the assumption underlying our
                   beliefs and behaviors. It can give justification for our ideas and actions. Most
                  important, perhaps, it means we try to judge the rationality of these justifications (p xvii).


The usage of advance technology can be adopted by the teachers from training institutions, coaching
centers, learning advance courses, attending workshops, crash courses or online learning programs. It offers
many advantages, such as:
             Learning independently
             Self- paced
             Customized
             Competency
             No heroes need
             Uniformity
             Cost effective
             Learning Vs Teaching
             Driving Forces
             Shows Impressive Track Record
             Knowledge of training
             Explore New World
             Competency Based Learning


Weizenbaum argues that, lack of appropriate guidelines limit the teachers’ to use the technology for
instruction and limits the desire to explore the use of technology beyond basic applications, “computers can
be a powerful metaphor for understanding many aspects of the world.” It enslaves the mind that has no
metaphors and few resources to call on – the mind that has been educated with only facts and skills” (51).


        The personal constraints of the teachers can’t fully integrate the technology into their own
                                                      52
Journal of Education and Practice                                                               www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol 3, No 1, 2012

practices because of organization, administration, pedagogy and personal. Leh claims that the teachers
acknowledge “technology was more of problem with multiple facets rather than a solution …” (19).
Imparting technology into a curriculum makes an impact on students’learning. Technology should not be
treated as a separate entity but should be considered as an integral aprt of instructional delivery. The teacher
should select the objective of the lesson, methods of instruction, evaluation, feedback and follow-up
initiatives. Most of the teachers have a narrow view on technology. They fail to relate it to pedagogy to
improve the teaching or facilitate learning. Teachers are not making widespread use of their networks now
that many more schools and classrooms are wired. Most teachers are not well prepared to use new
technologies. Teachers are isolated from each other and preoccupied with their regular schedule. Means
points out that technology training must go beyond focusing on the acquisition of technical skills but
attention should be given “to the instructional strategies needed to infuse technological skills into the
learning process”(92). Technology for teaching and learning should be part of the instruction milieu.
Technology training tends to focus on computer applications such as word processing, spreadsheets and
databases. Sprague et al argues:


                   Using technology for instruction should include mastery of the techniques
                   to apply it to teaching (24).


Technology helps teachers to think how to integrate it into day to day instructions in the classroom teaching
because:


           Technology used as a cognitive tool helps students to understand concepts, develop conceptual
           models and solve problems.
           Technology used as communication tool fosters discourse and collaboration among educators,
           students, parents, and the community.
           Technology used as management tool increases efficiency for teachers and students.
           Technology used as an evaluation tool helps teachers reflect on an modify instruction and provides
           feedback on student learning.
           Technology used as a motivational tool encourages and engages students in learning.



           The teacher recognizes his relation with technology in education and pedagogical decision –
making. Anderson and Borthwick evidences “participants whose technology instruction was integrated in
their methods course reported more frequent use of technology for both teacher productivity and student
project during both on – campus courses and their first year of actual classroom teaching” (5). The relation
between teacher and technology explores the pedagogical issues which are relevant and consider successful
application of technology into teaching and learning. It is very important to perceive technology as a part of
pedagogical process. Teachers must understand the basic pedagogical principles that govern the application
of technology into teaching and learning. Technology implementation should be identified by the teacher at
the planning stage, students readiness, lesson objectives, methods of presenting, evaluation strategies,
                                                      53
Journal of Education and Practice                                                               www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
Vol 3, No 1, 2012

follow-up activities etc. the poor implementation of technology by the teacher may affect the desired
outcome.


WORKS-CITED
    1.   Anderson, C.L. & Borthwick, A. Results of separate and integrated technology instruction in
         pre-service training. ERIC Reproduction Document # IRO21919, P.14.
    2.   Becker, Henry. Internet Use by Teachers. 1999. http://
         www.crito.uci.edu?TLC/FINDINGS/internet-use/start page.htm.
    3.   Cognition and Technology group at Vanderbilt (1992). “The Jasper Experiment: An Exploration of
         Issues in Learning and Instructional Design.” Educational Technology Research and Development,
         40 (1), 65-80.
    4.   Diaz, D.P & Bontenbal, K.F. Pedagogy-based technology training. In P.Hoffman & D.Lemke
         (eds.), Teaching and Learning in a Network World, P. 50-54. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 105 Press.
    5.   Fletcher, G. Former director of the Division of Educational Technology, Texas Education Agency,
         executive Vice President of T.H.E. Institute quoted in T.H.E. Journal, 24 (4), P.87.
    6.   Fullan, Michael G. The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teachers College Press.
    7.   Lever – Duffy, J. Mc Donald, J.B & Mizell ALP. Teaching and learning with technology, San
         Francisco: Pearson.
    8.   Mezirow, J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and
         empanicipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass.
    9.   The American Heritage Dictionary of English Language (3rd edition). Boston, MA: Houghton
         Mifflin Company.
    10. Weizenbaum, J. Computer power and human reason. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
    11. Leh, A.S. Learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case
         study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2005 13(1), pp.15-41.
    12. Means, B. Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed),
         Technology and education reform: the reality behind the promise, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,
         1994, p.92.
    13. Sprague, D., Kopfman, K & Dorsey, S. Faculty development in the integration of technology in
         teacher education courses. Journal of computing in Teacher Education, 1998, 2(14), pp.24.
    14. Saetler, Paul. The Evolution of American Educational Technology, Dencer, Co:Libraries Unlimited,
         1990, p.1.




                                                     54

The role of teacher and technology in perspective of classroom teaching

  • 1.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 The Role of Teacher and Technology in Perspective of Classroom Teaching K.Venkat Satish (Corresponding Author) Mother Teresa Institute of Science and Technology, Kotturu-Sattupally, Khammam-507303 , Andhra Pradesh-India Email: [email protected] Boggavarapu Krishna Priya Zilla Parishad Secondary School, Dammapeta-Khammam Abstract Classroom teaching is a demanding job. Teacher spends most of his time in teaching. Teacher is responsible for many tasks in the classroom teaching. Teacher plans and implement the instructions. He plays the role of managers, psychologists, counselors, custodians, communicators, social ambassadors and entertainers. Sometimes teacher becomes disillusion and frustration while performing the multi tasks because the classroom demands, distracts and challenges the teacher to use new tools to brush up the key concepts and skills in regarding Science, Social Studies, Art and other curriculum standards. He tries to focus on effective teaching with the help of new tools. The practice of new tools able the students to read, reason, powerful writing, communicate productively with global community and conduct thoughtful research. The teacher faces the success in the right implementation of tools i.e. technology. Now a day the integration of technology in teaching and learning process has become a perennial one. Technology liberates to reestablish the role and value of the individual classroom teacher. The two things are compulsory for the usage of technology “first the perspective of the classroom must change to become learner centered, second, students and teachers must enter into a collaboration or partnership with technology in order to create a “community” that nurtures, encourages and supports the learning process” (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). This paper focuses on the relation between teacher and the technology in the classroom teaching. Introduction In teaching and learning, technology should apply as a process rather than as a single, isolated and discrete activity. The American Heritage Dictionary defines process as “a series of action, changes, and functions bringing about a result” (AHD). Technology in education is not a mere object to introduce into teaching and learning activities without considering basic principles of learning and sound teaching methodology. Technology is an object that can be used at any time. Technology in education is guided by learning principles and individuals. It retains the knowledge and required skills. Technology satisfies the student’s expectations of the outcome of learning, application of knowledge, enrich practical life experiences. Technology in Education is often considered, erroneously, as synonymous with instructional innovation. Saetler argues that “educators are correct to resist mere innovation, but they should welcome educational 49
  • 2.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 technology” (1). Submission of technology helps the teacher in sound teaching, learning principles, avoids teaching hardware, out come of conventional mode of teaching, and helps to deliver instructions coherently. The integration of technology with education grounds the sound practice. Fletcher says: When you go to the hardware store to buy a drill, you don’t actually want a drill, you want a hole, they don’t sell holes at the hardware store, but they do sell drill, which are the technology used to make holes. We must not lose sight that technology for the part is a tool and it should be used in applications which address educations concerns (87). In many schools, teachers are isolated from each other and preoccupied; Fullan calls “the daily press” of getting through their schedule. The implementation of technology in the classroom brings creative exploration, invention and testing. It breaks down the conventional atmosphere of isolate teaching and boredom. Technology facilitates the work of teams and provides ample time for all round development. The teacher can spend much time and bring innovative changes in the teaching methodology. Gardening provides a useful metaphor for this process. We will see more growth if we cultivate the soil and fertilize before planting. An exclusive focus on skills and software is a bit like spreading seeds across a concrete playground. Henry Becker presents his research in this context that “the preferred teaching strategies and styles of teachers usually determine or shape the patterns of technology usage. He says “traditional” teachers are far less apt to allow students to use new technologies than “constructivist” teachers even when they have networked computers in their classrooms.” The scope of implementing technology is examined with a view of showing its relation with pedagogy. Technology should be used to facilitate learning in the part of the instructional process. It should include theories about technology integration and the application of research findings. Teachers should select the desired technologies, skills to demonstrate the selected technologies, skills to evaluate technologies, skills to customize and skills to address instructional problems to the students. The objective and method of instruction include technology and outcomes of instruction. Diaz and Bontembal say: Using technology to enhance the educational process involves more than just learning how to use specific piece of hardware and software. It requires an understanding of pedagogical principles that are specific to the use of technology in an instructional settings … pedagogy- based training begins by helping teachers understand the role of learning theory in the design and function of class activities and in the selection and use of instructional technologies (2-6). Technology in education is commonly used to enhance the instructions by the facilitator in the classroom. According to Lever-Duffy, McDonald and Mizell “educational technology might include media, models, projected and non-projected visual, as well as audio, video and digital media” and are likely to “confine 50
  • 3.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 educational technology primarily to computers, computer peripheral and related software used for teaching and learning” (4-5). Technology helps the teachers to improve their productivity and professional practice. While creating electronic documents, they can consider a variety of purposes and audiences, and effectively share information locally and globally. Through the use of educational technology, teachers can present and assess student work and communicate more easily with parents. The following table exhibits the productivity and professional practice by the teacher with the help of technology: Competency Initial Developing Proficient A. Use educational I create electronic I use desktop I use technology to communicate and technology to documents using publishing and collaborate with students, parents and communicate/collaborate word processing multimedia tools to colleagues. with students, parents software as create newsletters, and teachers. instructional brochure and materials and presentations. assessments tasks. B. Use online resources I use e-mail to I search the Internet I incorporate online courses, to communicate/ communicate on a and online distance learning and/or video Collaborate with school regular basis and resources to locate conferencing as instructional tools. community (students, search the Internet for and retrieve parents & teachers) and curriculum related curriculum-related global community. information. information. C. Use technology to I use technology tools I use data to assist I use different applications to collect collect and manage date such as spreadsheets in making sound and manage data as an internal part related to teaching and and databases to educational of my classroom management. learning. collect and manage decisions regarding data. classroom management. D. Identify, use and I consistently look for I align new skills I experiment with new concepts and evaluate technology to opportunities to learn with curriculum pilot new practices, using support the learning about new software strategies for technology for ongoing, embedded process for all students applications and skills integration and professional development. through ongoing that expand my share ideas and professional working knowledge resources with development. technology and colleagues. promote best practices. It is very important for teachers to use a variety of teaching methods to evaluate and modify their students. Teachers engage students in an exploratory learning experience which is designed to stimulate thinking. Bruner states: 51
  • 4.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 To instruct someone … is not a matter of getting him to commit results to mind. Rather, it is to teach him to participate in the process that makes possible the establishment of knowledge. We teach a subject not to produce little living libraries on that subject, but rather to get a student to think mathematically for himself, to consider matters as historian does, to take part in the process of knowledge-getting. Knowing is a process not a product (72). Teacher explores the process of technology and searches the ways to accomplish his teaching effectively. It develops the rationale to examine the appropriateness of using technology are companionable with the lesson plan and learning outcomes. The process of exploring the relationship between technologies is on the part of teachers. Mezirow argues: Thinking critically involves our recognizing the assumption underlying our beliefs and behaviors. It can give justification for our ideas and actions. Most important, perhaps, it means we try to judge the rationality of these justifications (p xvii). The usage of advance technology can be adopted by the teachers from training institutions, coaching centers, learning advance courses, attending workshops, crash courses or online learning programs. It offers many advantages, such as: Learning independently Self- paced Customized Competency No heroes need Uniformity Cost effective Learning Vs Teaching Driving Forces Shows Impressive Track Record Knowledge of training Explore New World Competency Based Learning Weizenbaum argues that, lack of appropriate guidelines limit the teachers’ to use the technology for instruction and limits the desire to explore the use of technology beyond basic applications, “computers can be a powerful metaphor for understanding many aspects of the world.” It enslaves the mind that has no metaphors and few resources to call on – the mind that has been educated with only facts and skills” (51). The personal constraints of the teachers can’t fully integrate the technology into their own 52
  • 5.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 practices because of organization, administration, pedagogy and personal. Leh claims that the teachers acknowledge “technology was more of problem with multiple facets rather than a solution …” (19). Imparting technology into a curriculum makes an impact on students’learning. Technology should not be treated as a separate entity but should be considered as an integral aprt of instructional delivery. The teacher should select the objective of the lesson, methods of instruction, evaluation, feedback and follow-up initiatives. Most of the teachers have a narrow view on technology. They fail to relate it to pedagogy to improve the teaching or facilitate learning. Teachers are not making widespread use of their networks now that many more schools and classrooms are wired. Most teachers are not well prepared to use new technologies. Teachers are isolated from each other and preoccupied with their regular schedule. Means points out that technology training must go beyond focusing on the acquisition of technical skills but attention should be given “to the instructional strategies needed to infuse technological skills into the learning process”(92). Technology for teaching and learning should be part of the instruction milieu. Technology training tends to focus on computer applications such as word processing, spreadsheets and databases. Sprague et al argues: Using technology for instruction should include mastery of the techniques to apply it to teaching (24). Technology helps teachers to think how to integrate it into day to day instructions in the classroom teaching because: Technology used as a cognitive tool helps students to understand concepts, develop conceptual models and solve problems. Technology used as communication tool fosters discourse and collaboration among educators, students, parents, and the community. Technology used as management tool increases efficiency for teachers and students. Technology used as an evaluation tool helps teachers reflect on an modify instruction and provides feedback on student learning. Technology used as a motivational tool encourages and engages students in learning. The teacher recognizes his relation with technology in education and pedagogical decision – making. Anderson and Borthwick evidences “participants whose technology instruction was integrated in their methods course reported more frequent use of technology for both teacher productivity and student project during both on – campus courses and their first year of actual classroom teaching” (5). The relation between teacher and technology explores the pedagogical issues which are relevant and consider successful application of technology into teaching and learning. It is very important to perceive technology as a part of pedagogical process. Teachers must understand the basic pedagogical principles that govern the application of technology into teaching and learning. Technology implementation should be identified by the teacher at the planning stage, students readiness, lesson objectives, methods of presenting, evaluation strategies, 53
  • 6.
    Journal of Educationand Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol 3, No 1, 2012 follow-up activities etc. the poor implementation of technology by the teacher may affect the desired outcome. WORKS-CITED 1. Anderson, C.L. & Borthwick, A. Results of separate and integrated technology instruction in pre-service training. ERIC Reproduction Document # IRO21919, P.14. 2. Becker, Henry. Internet Use by Teachers. 1999. http:// www.crito.uci.edu?TLC/FINDINGS/internet-use/start page.htm. 3. Cognition and Technology group at Vanderbilt (1992). “The Jasper Experiment: An Exploration of Issues in Learning and Instructional Design.” Educational Technology Research and Development, 40 (1), 65-80. 4. Diaz, D.P & Bontenbal, K.F. Pedagogy-based technology training. In P.Hoffman & D.Lemke (eds.), Teaching and Learning in a Network World, P. 50-54. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 105 Press. 5. Fletcher, G. Former director of the Division of Educational Technology, Texas Education Agency, executive Vice President of T.H.E. Institute quoted in T.H.E. Journal, 24 (4), P.87. 6. Fullan, Michael G. The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teachers College Press. 7. Lever – Duffy, J. Mc Donald, J.B & Mizell ALP. Teaching and learning with technology, San Francisco: Pearson. 8. Mezirow, J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and empanicipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass. 9. The American Heritage Dictionary of English Language (3rd edition). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 10. Weizenbaum, J. Computer power and human reason. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman. 11. Leh, A.S. Learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2005 13(1), pp.15-41. 12. Means, B. Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed), Technology and education reform: the reality behind the promise, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994, p.92. 13. Sprague, D., Kopfman, K & Dorsey, S. Faculty development in the integration of technology in teacher education courses. Journal of computing in Teacher Education, 1998, 2(14), pp.24. 14. Saetler, Paul. The Evolution of American Educational Technology, Dencer, Co:Libraries Unlimited, 1990, p.1. 54