Learning from thriving regional co-operative ecosystems | 1 December 2021 | WEBINAR #1
Wessel Vermeulen
Economist
OECD Trento Centre
The spatial dimension of productivity in Italian
co-operatives
Key findings & takeaways
12-02-2021
Webinar
OECD Trento Centre for Local Development
Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities
2
Institutional framework
Mattia Corbetta
Policy Analyst
Wessel Vermeulen
Economist
Alexandra Tsvetkova
Policy Analyst/Economist
Trento Centre for Local
Development / LESI / CFE
Spatial distribution:
Share of co-operatives employment
Italy average:
CEs: 4.2% total employ.
SCs: 2.4% total employ.
Both CEs and SCs indicate
a north-south pattern, but
reversed from concentration
Combined employment
ranging from
12.9% in Emilia-Romagna
12.5% in Trento
…
2.9% Aosta Valley
3.6% Calabria
3
Share of co-operative employment increased slightly in most
regions during 2012-2017
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2012 2017 Growth of employment
share of co-operatives in
16 out of 21 regions
Considerable increase in
Molise and Trento
4
CEs and SCs concentrate in specific sectors
Cs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Employment as % of total sector employment
CEs SCs
Employment
• CEs
• Transport
• Agrifood
• SCs
• Health and Social Care
• Education
5
• Vast majority of co-operatives are small
(0-9 empl.) but large (50-249 and 250+)
add most to employment share
• Relative to other firms, co-operatives
proportionally employ
– Fewer employees on a full time, and
permanent contract
– Fewer employees below 30 years old
– More female employees
• Employment patterns may correlate with
– Sector specificities, economic environment of
activity, more flexible work arrangements
Further insights
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Others CEs
SCs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
CEs 25th quantile
75th quantile
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
SCs 25th quantile
75th quantile
Co-operatives productivity relative to other firms
100 = CEs + SCs in
2017
Substantial gab on
average between co-
operative enterprises and
other firms.
Top 25% CEs outperform
the average of other firms
Examples of good
performers:
Umbria/Tuscany/Emilia-
Romagna/
Wholesale and Retail
Trade/Construction (CEs)
/ Education (SCs)
7
Co-operative enterprises productivity varies considerably across
sectors
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Wholesale and
Retail Trade
Agrifood Construction KIBS Industry Education Other Services
to Persons
Other Services
to Enterprises
Health and
Social Care
Transport
MFP (ORBIS) LP (INPS) Productivity in Wholesale
and Retail Trade is high,
aided by the presence of
some large CEs. Agrifood
also very competitive
SCs most competitive in
Education and Health and
Social Care, but very
different from other firms
Large employment shares: CEs SCs
8
Average productivity shows geographical pattern
Strong north-south
pattern
Suggesting co-operative
productivity follows
broader patterns of
private sector
In only three regions,
CEs are more
productive than other
firms: Umbria, Tuscany
and Emilia-Romagna
9
Regional factors of co-operative productivity (CEs)
Co-operative
productivity
Local
institutional
quality
Employment in
R&D sectors
FDIs
Density
Unemployment
rate
Agriculture
EU cohesion
funds
NB. No causal mechanisms
In common with
other firms
Potentially co-
operative specific
10
Factors not linked:
Entrepreneurship
Demographics
Digital tools adoption of co-operatives
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Digital
signature
WEB site Social
channels
Cloud
development
and other
tools for
remote work
Company
intranet
No ICT tool
used
E-commerce
site to sell
online
Programming
and Planning
Systems
(ERP)
Industry 4.0 Intercompany
intranet
Other
2020 2017-2019 Digital tools are mostly
limited to easily obtainable
or free services
Newest technologies are
underused
11
What are the main barriers to technology adoption?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Cost of software and
equipment
Legacy issues Lack of skills Cost of information and
communication services
Lack of access to the
high-speed network
Other
• High costs
• Low absorptive
capacity
• Inadequate
infrastructure
12
0
5
10
15
20
25
Percentage of co-operatives employment in region Percentage of co-operatives employment of national
56
The cooperative sector in Spain: Basque country
Basque country presents
a unique case in Europe
Other nationally important
regions:
Andalusia, Valencia and
Catalonia
Key national statistics
20 000 CEs (57 000 in Italy)
~2% of total employment (6.6% in Italy)… but large regional division
56% of all Spanish employment in cooperatives are in the Basque country,
23% of regional employment
How do Spanish co-operatives perform comparatively
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Wholesale
and Retail
Trade
Construction Other
Services to
Enterprises
Education Agrifood Other
Services to
Persons
Transport Industry KIBS Health and
Social Care
Italy Basque Country Rest of Spain Each group compared
against other firms in their
own territories
Basque co-operatives are
competitive across
sectors
Italian and other Spanish
follow largely similar
patterns, lagging behind
other firms
15
Policy recommendations
Data
Expanding the evidence base
on co-operatives and their key
performance indicators,
including productivity
Awareness
Further action to raise public
awareness of the economic and
social value of co-operatives and
how enhanced productivity could
amplify their impact
Governance
Fostering co-operation between
relevant institutions and multi-
stakeholder dialogue to prepare
the ground for targeted policies
Instruments
Devising fit-for-purpose policy
tools to make co-operatives
more resilient and productive
Thank you
OECD Trento Centre for Local Development
Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities
Kick-off Analysis Drafting Review Launch
22
Timeline and structure
July 2020 Summer 2020 Fall 2020 In progress 30/03/2021
• Chapter 1: Conceptual framework
• Chapter 2: Background information on co-operative concentration and employment
• Chapter 3: Exploring spatial productivity in Italian co-operatives
• Chapter 4: Comparative analysis with Spain
• Chapter 5: Policy recommendations

The spatial dimension of productivity in Italian co-operatives- Wessel Vermeulen

  • 1.
    Learning from thrivingregional co-operative ecosystems | 1 December 2021 | WEBINAR #1 Wessel Vermeulen Economist OECD Trento Centre
  • 2.
    The spatial dimensionof productivity in Italian co-operatives Key findings & takeaways 12-02-2021 Webinar OECD Trento Centre for Local Development Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities
  • 3.
    2 Institutional framework Mattia Corbetta PolicyAnalyst Wessel Vermeulen Economist Alexandra Tsvetkova Policy Analyst/Economist Trento Centre for Local Development / LESI / CFE
  • 4.
    Spatial distribution: Share ofco-operatives employment Italy average: CEs: 4.2% total employ. SCs: 2.4% total employ. Both CEs and SCs indicate a north-south pattern, but reversed from concentration Combined employment ranging from 12.9% in Emilia-Romagna 12.5% in Trento … 2.9% Aosta Valley 3.6% Calabria 3
  • 5.
    Share of co-operativeemployment increased slightly in most regions during 2012-2017 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2012 2017 Growth of employment share of co-operatives in 16 out of 21 regions Considerable increase in Molise and Trento 4
  • 6.
    CEs and SCsconcentrate in specific sectors Cs 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Employment as % of total sector employment CEs SCs Employment • CEs • Transport • Agrifood • SCs • Health and Social Care • Education 5
  • 7.
    • Vast majorityof co-operatives are small (0-9 empl.) but large (50-249 and 250+) add most to employment share • Relative to other firms, co-operatives proportionally employ – Fewer employees on a full time, and permanent contract – Fewer employees below 30 years old – More female employees • Employment patterns may correlate with – Sector specificities, economic environment of activity, more flexible work arrangements Further insights 6
  • 8.
    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2012 2013 20142015 2016 2017 Others CEs SCs 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CEs 25th quantile 75th quantile 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SCs 25th quantile 75th quantile Co-operatives productivity relative to other firms 100 = CEs + SCs in 2017 Substantial gab on average between co- operative enterprises and other firms. Top 25% CEs outperform the average of other firms Examples of good performers: Umbria/Tuscany/Emilia- Romagna/ Wholesale and Retail Trade/Construction (CEs) / Education (SCs) 7
  • 9.
    Co-operative enterprises productivityvaries considerably across sectors 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Wholesale and Retail Trade Agrifood Construction KIBS Industry Education Other Services to Persons Other Services to Enterprises Health and Social Care Transport MFP (ORBIS) LP (INPS) Productivity in Wholesale and Retail Trade is high, aided by the presence of some large CEs. Agrifood also very competitive SCs most competitive in Education and Health and Social Care, but very different from other firms Large employment shares: CEs SCs 8
  • 10.
    Average productivity showsgeographical pattern Strong north-south pattern Suggesting co-operative productivity follows broader patterns of private sector In only three regions, CEs are more productive than other firms: Umbria, Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna 9
  • 11.
    Regional factors ofco-operative productivity (CEs) Co-operative productivity Local institutional quality Employment in R&D sectors FDIs Density Unemployment rate Agriculture EU cohesion funds NB. No causal mechanisms In common with other firms Potentially co- operative specific 10 Factors not linked: Entrepreneurship Demographics
  • 12.
    Digital tools adoptionof co-operatives 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Digital signature WEB site Social channels Cloud development and other tools for remote work Company intranet No ICT tool used E-commerce site to sell online Programming and Planning Systems (ERP) Industry 4.0 Intercompany intranet Other 2020 2017-2019 Digital tools are mostly limited to easily obtainable or free services Newest technologies are underused 11
  • 13.
    What are themain barriers to technology adoption? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Cost of software and equipment Legacy issues Lack of skills Cost of information and communication services Lack of access to the high-speed network Other • High costs • Low absorptive capacity • Inadequate infrastructure 12
  • 14.
    0 5 10 15 20 25 Percentage of co-operativesemployment in region Percentage of co-operatives employment of national 56 The cooperative sector in Spain: Basque country Basque country presents a unique case in Europe Other nationally important regions: Andalusia, Valencia and Catalonia Key national statistics 20 000 CEs (57 000 in Italy) ~2% of total employment (6.6% in Italy)… but large regional division 56% of all Spanish employment in cooperatives are in the Basque country, 23% of regional employment
  • 15.
    How do Spanishco-operatives perform comparatively 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Wholesale and Retail Trade Construction Other Services to Enterprises Education Agrifood Other Services to Persons Transport Industry KIBS Health and Social Care Italy Basque Country Rest of Spain Each group compared against other firms in their own territories Basque co-operatives are competitive across sectors Italian and other Spanish follow largely similar patterns, lagging behind other firms
  • 16.
    15 Policy recommendations Data Expanding theevidence base on co-operatives and their key performance indicators, including productivity Awareness Further action to raise public awareness of the economic and social value of co-operatives and how enhanced productivity could amplify their impact Governance Fostering co-operation between relevant institutions and multi- stakeholder dialogue to prepare the ground for targeted policies Instruments Devising fit-for-purpose policy tools to make co-operatives more resilient and productive
  • 17.
    Thank you OECD TrentoCentre for Local Development Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities
  • 18.
    Kick-off Analysis DraftingReview Launch 22 Timeline and structure July 2020 Summer 2020 Fall 2020 In progress 30/03/2021 • Chapter 1: Conceptual framework • Chapter 2: Background information on co-operative concentration and employment • Chapter 3: Exploring spatial productivity in Italian co-operatives • Chapter 4: Comparative analysis with Spain • Chapter 5: Policy recommendations