The Story
of the
Research
Skills Tutorial
Bowman Library
Menlo College
Beginnings
A bit of history
 Library skills tutorial became General Education
requirement for 2005-2006 academic year
 Old TILT-based tutorial called
Big Picture Goals for Tutorial:
 Apply to life and job skills as well as academic – making students
know they will use these skills after college
 Describe the kinds of information, how each is used and packaged,
and authority of producer ; the academic publishing and research
process
 Explain the student’s role in research process
Goals of our tutorial:
 Incorporate tools and services of library web site; provide visual
recognition
 Explain subscription resources & their availability at public libraries
after graduation
 Act as a foundation for information literacy skills with mini-modules
on specific topics that could be revisited
 Assess student skills with varying levels of difficulty for quizzes
 Be relatively easy to update later on
User-oriented Goals:
 Be engaging to Menlo students/not cutesy
 photos include Menlo students, faculty, assignments, & places
 focus on business & psychology
 Use timely examples that differ from module to module
 Be easy to use
 Provide definitions of library lingo
 Provide estimated time to complete modules
 Provide a place for feedback
Reviewing existing tutorials
Google Docs Survey
Reviewing existing tutorials
Surveying Bowman Librarians
Sample Questions
Sample Answers
Creating content
 From outline to
PowerPoint
High level tutorial content
High level theme concepts
Module creation
 Text,
images,
division of
labor
Recurring content
 Interactive opportunities for
practicing of skills
 Try it! (Concept check - not
graded)
 Where you, the student, fit in
Borrowed content
 Scholarly/popular sources
interactive segment (mod.1)
 CRAAP criteria for evaluating
websites (mod. 4)
Quizzes
 Read literature and
education sites for
suggestions on quiz
writing
 Quiz taking becomes
learning experience for
student because the quiz
responds back to student
and offers ability to retry
questions
Videos
 Writing scripts
 Finding/creating images
 Technology trial & error & training
 Tools
 Powerpoint
 Camtasia (video & audio production)
 Jing (screenshots & web-friendly, fast-
loading images)
 Smartphone camera (instant uploads)
 Techsmith.com (primary video hosting) &
YouTube
Production
 Worked remotely with Sarah via shared files on a server to which
she had access
 Design and coding
 Collaborative feedback via e-mail
Usability testing
 Tested with 3 freshmen
 Script, observation
 What we changed
 Less text per slide
 Added slide numbering, you-are-here navigation
 Quiz revisions
Timeline
Summer 2011 -- brainstormed; looked at other tutorials
Fall 2011-Spring 2012 -- refined content; online course in
producing tutorials; design concepts
Summer 2012 -- recorded videos; more content
refinement; design; production of site
Fall 2012 -- usability testing; minor refinement
January 2013 -- rolled out finished tutorial
Post-Production
 Assessment
 Test results file
 Freshman completion rate at 89.4%
 What we might do differently
 Length
 Less elaborate, shorter videos
 Repurposing an existing tutorial
 Current technology changes?
Contact info
 Sarah Clatterbuck (sarah at secadvertising.com)
 Linda K. Smith (lsmith at menlo.edu)
 Lisa Velarde (lvelarde at ccsf.edu)

The Story of the Bowman Library Research Skills Tutorial

  • 1.
    The Story of the Research SkillsTutorial Bowman Library Menlo College
  • 2.
  • 3.
    A bit ofhistory  Library skills tutorial became General Education requirement for 2005-2006 academic year  Old TILT-based tutorial called
  • 4.
    Big Picture Goalsfor Tutorial:  Apply to life and job skills as well as academic – making students know they will use these skills after college  Describe the kinds of information, how each is used and packaged, and authority of producer ; the academic publishing and research process  Explain the student’s role in research process
  • 5.
    Goals of ourtutorial:  Incorporate tools and services of library web site; provide visual recognition  Explain subscription resources & their availability at public libraries after graduation  Act as a foundation for information literacy skills with mini-modules on specific topics that could be revisited  Assess student skills with varying levels of difficulty for quizzes  Be relatively easy to update later on
  • 6.
    User-oriented Goals:  Beengaging to Menlo students/not cutesy  photos include Menlo students, faculty, assignments, & places  focus on business & psychology  Use timely examples that differ from module to module  Be easy to use  Provide definitions of library lingo  Provide estimated time to complete modules  Provide a place for feedback
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Surveying Bowman Librarians SampleQuestions Sample Answers
  • 10.
    Creating content  Fromoutline to PowerPoint
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Recurring content  Interactiveopportunities for practicing of skills  Try it! (Concept check - not graded)  Where you, the student, fit in
  • 15.
    Borrowed content  Scholarly/popularsources interactive segment (mod.1)  CRAAP criteria for evaluating websites (mod. 4)
  • 16.
    Quizzes  Read literatureand education sites for suggestions on quiz writing  Quiz taking becomes learning experience for student because the quiz responds back to student and offers ability to retry questions
  • 17.
    Videos  Writing scripts Finding/creating images  Technology trial & error & training  Tools  Powerpoint  Camtasia (video & audio production)  Jing (screenshots & web-friendly, fast- loading images)  Smartphone camera (instant uploads)  Techsmith.com (primary video hosting) & YouTube
  • 18.
    Production  Worked remotelywith Sarah via shared files on a server to which she had access  Design and coding  Collaborative feedback via e-mail
  • 19.
    Usability testing  Testedwith 3 freshmen  Script, observation  What we changed  Less text per slide  Added slide numbering, you-are-here navigation  Quiz revisions
  • 20.
    Timeline Summer 2011 --brainstormed; looked at other tutorials Fall 2011-Spring 2012 -- refined content; online course in producing tutorials; design concepts Summer 2012 -- recorded videos; more content refinement; design; production of site Fall 2012 -- usability testing; minor refinement January 2013 -- rolled out finished tutorial
  • 21.
    Post-Production  Assessment  Testresults file  Freshman completion rate at 89.4%  What we might do differently  Length  Less elaborate, shorter videos  Repurposing an existing tutorial  Current technology changes?
  • 22.
    Contact info  SarahClatterbuck (sarah at secadvertising.com)  Linda K. Smith (lsmith at menlo.edu)  Lisa Velarde (lvelarde at ccsf.edu)

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Start by showing intro video
  • #3 LS
  • #4 LS gives very brief explanation of what we had and how we decided to scrap Woodie and do a completely new tutorial
  • #5 LS - Tutorial always viewed as laying fdn for our teaching of course-specific library sessions and our daily point-of-need reference interactions
  • #6 LS - Our ideas influenced by individual preferences, but also from experts in more than just info lit field -- e.g., a list of what a scholar needs by Karen Coyle, a library technology expert; Land and Meyer’s threshold concepts related to how students move from one concept to another in their thinking. Our library dean, whose expertise is collection development, weighed in on taking a broad overview of scholarly information and libraries
  • #7 LS - Tutorial always viewed as laying fdn for our teaching of course-specific library sessions and our daily point-of-need reference interactions
  • #8 LV - Mention that the entire process was very collaborative; small staff; everyone was involved. Explain what we did.
  • #9 LV
  • #10 LV
  • #11 LS
  • #12 LS
  • #13 SC
  • #14 LV
  • #15 LV
  • #16 LV
  • #17 LS
  • #18 LV/LS
  • #19 LS/SC
  • #20 LV
  • #21 LS
  • #22 LS/LV/SC