Thoraco lumbar injuries Dr.Zameer Ali PG orthopaedics St stephens hospital
Cervical - 7 vertebrae Thoracic - 12 vertebrae Lumbar - 5 vertebrae Sacral - 5 fused vertebrae Coccyx - 4 fused vertebrae
Some important facts Spinal cord ends below lower border of L1 Cauda equina is below L1 Mid dorsal spinal cord & neural canal space are of same diameter hence prone for complete lesion  Mechanical injury - early ischaemia, cord edema - cord necrosis Neurological recovery unpredictable in cauda equina ie. peripheral nerves
Thoraco lumbar injuries Fractures and dislocations of the spine are serious injuries that most commonly occur in young people. Nearly 43% of patients with spinal cord injuries sustain multiple injuries.
Kraus et al. estimated that each year 50 people in 1 million sustain a spinal cord injury
Of those who die within 1 year of their accidents, 90% die en route to the hospital.  Overall, 85% of patients with a spinal cord injury who survive the first 24 hours are still alive 10 years later compared with 98% of patients of similar age and sex without spinal cord injury.
cause common of death According to the National Spinal Cord Injury Association, the most cause common of death is respiratory failure whereas in the past it was renal failure.
An increasing number of people with spinal cord injury are dying of unrelated causes, such as cancer or cardiovascular disease, similar to that of the general population. Mortality rates are significantly higher during the first year after injury than during subsequent years.
history A detailed history of the mechanism of injury is important but frequently is unobtainable at the initial examination.
Statistics  prevalence 10 - 15 per million age group  18 - 35 years  male/female - 3:1 RTA 51% - cars  Domestic 16% Industrial 11% Sports 16%  -  diving incidents Self harm 5%
most common causes The most common causes of severe spinal trauma are  motor vehicle accidents, falls, diving accidents,  gunshot wounds
type Cervical 40% Thoracic 10% Lumbar 3% Dorso lumbar 35% Any 14%
Delay in diagnosis The most common causes of misdiagnosis were head trauma, acute alcoholic intoxication, and multiple injuries. Patients with decreased levels of consciousness or comatose patients often do not complain of back pain.
Delay in diagnosis Profuse bleeding from severe facial or scalp lacerations may divert attention from the cervical spinal injury
Most isolated thoracic and lumbar spine fractures are related to osteoporosis and involve minimal or no trauma. In fact, osteoporosis-related fractures far outnumber trauma-related thoracic and lumbar fractures. Osteoporosis leads to approximately 750,000 vertebral fractures each year in the United States
The annual rate of trauma-related thoracic and lumbar fractures is approximately 15,000 (14). Thoracic and lumbar fractures account for 30% to 50% of all spinal injuries in trauma patients
In trauma patients, thoracic and lumbar fractures are concentrated at the thoracolumbar junction, with 60% of thoracic and lumbar fractures occurring between the T11 and L2 vertebral levels (15
Neurologic injury occurs in one fourth of thoracic and lumbar fractures associated with trauma
Spinal instability A spine injury is considered unstable if normal physiological loads cause further neurological damage ,chronic pain and unacceptable deformity
Stability and Instability of the Vertebral Column The concept of spinal stability is central to the field of spine surgery.
Spinal fusion and fixation surgery, in fact, is performed primarily to restore stability of the spinal column after instability from injury, degeneration, or decompression to address neural tissue
Spinal instability is variably defined, widely interpreted, and inconsistently measured
Treatment and outcome of spine injuries are integrally related to the neurological status,  definition of spinal stability in trauma should be centred on preservation of neural function.
Historically, discussions of spinal stability have focused on the vertebral column and not on neural structures or neural function
Functional spinal unit composed of two adjacent vertebrae and their intervening ligaments and inter vertebral disc,
the anterior structures are the vertebral body and the intervertebral disc, and the posterior structures are the facet joints, laminae, spinous processes, and posterior intervertebral ligaments.
functional spinal unit is stable if all anterior structures plus one posterior structure are intact, or alternatively, if all posterior structures and one anterior structure are intact
White and panjabi  For assessing spinal instability Thoraco lumbar stability usually follows the middle column if it is intact then injury is usually stable
Thoracic and lumbar spine stability score  element /point score Ant. element unable to function….2 Post elem. Unable to function ….2 Disruption of costovertebral  articulation  …1 Radiographic criteria  4 Saggital displacement  >2.5mm  (2 points)
Relative sagittal plane angulation >5 degrees…..2  points Spinal cord or cauda equina damage…2 pts Dangerous loading anticipated …1 pt Instability  if score greater than 5
Lumbar spine stability scale Ant. element unable to function….2 Post elem. Unable to function ….2 Radiographic criteria  4 pts Flex. /ext. x rays Saggital plane translation >4.5 mm or 15% 2 pts
Sagittal plane rotation 2 pts >15 degrees at L1 –L4  >20 degrees at L4 – L5 >25 degrees at L5-S1 0r  Resting x rays
Sagittal plane displacement >4.5 mm or 15%  2 pts Relative sagittal plane angulation >22 degrees  2  pts  Spinal cord  or cauda equina damage 2 pts Cauda equina damage 3 pts Dangerous loading anticipated 1 pt
Roughly three types of spinal instability are recognized  First degree mechanical instability  potential for late kyphosis E.g. severe compression fractures  Seat belt type injuries
Second degree (neurologic instability) Potential for late neurologic injury  E.g. burst fractures without neurological deficits
Third degree (mech.and neur. Instability ) E.g. fracture dislocations/severe burst fractures with neurologic deficit
McAfee Factors indicative of instability in burst fractures >50% canal compromise >15 to 25 degrees of kyphosis >40 % loss of anterior vert.body height
MULTIPLE SPINAL FRACTURES If a spinal fracture is identified at any level, the entire spine should be examined with anteroposterior and lateral views to document the presence or absence of spinal fractures at other levels.
Multiple-level spinal fractures, which may be contiguous or separated, are estimated to occur in 3% to 5% of patients with spinal fractures
Multiple noncontiguous spinal fractures rarely occur without injury to the spinal cord.
Denis developed a three-column concept of spinal injury using a series of more than 400 CT scans of thoracolumbar injuries
Assesment of spinal stability 3 structural elements to be considered Posterior coloumn Middle coloumn Anterior coloumn All fractures involving middle coloumn and at lest one other coloumn should be regarded as unstable.
The anterior column contains the anterior longitudinal ligament, the anterior half of the vertebral body, and the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus.
The middle column consists of the posterior longitudinal ligament, the posterior half of the vertebral body, and the posterior aspect of the annulus fibrosus.
The posterior column includes the neural arch, the ligamentum flavum, the facet capsules, and the interspinous ligaments
Denis classification Minor spinal injuries 1 Articular processe fracture (1%) 2 transverse process fracture (14%) 3 Spinous process fracture  (2%) 4 Pars interarticularis fracture(1%)
Major spinal fractures Compression fractures 48% Burst fracture  14 % Fracture dislocation 16 % Seat belt type factures 5 %
Compression fracture 4 subtypes  on basis of end plate involvement A  fracture of both end plates 16% B Fracture of superior end plate 62% C fracture of inferior end plate 6 % 4 both end plates intact 15%
Compression Fracture Failure of anterior column Stable:  Tlso, hyperextension bracing Unstable  (>50% height, >30% kyphosis, multi level) Progressive deformity
Burst Fracture Failure of anterior and middle column Axial compression +/- failure of posterior column Compression or tensile force Most common at T/L junction
Burst fracture subtypes 4 subtypes  on basis of end plate involvement A  fracture of both end plates 24% B Fracture of superior end plate 49% C fracture of inferior end plate 7 % 4 both end plates intact 15% Burst lateral flexion 5 %
Early stabilization is required in both saggital and coronal plane in patients with 1 neurological deficit 2 Loss of vertebral body height >50 % 3 angulations of >20 degree 4 Canal compromise of >50 % scoliosis of >10 degree
Burst Fracture Neuro intact <20-30 kyphosis, <45-50 canal compromise >20-30 kyphosis, >45-50 canal compromise Neuro compromised
Flexion Distraction Injury Chance fracture ,seat belt type fracture  Bone or soft tissue?
Flexion Distraction Injury Type A one level bony injury Type B one level ligamnetous injury Type C two level injury through bony middle column Type D  two level injury through ligamentous  middle column
Spinal Stability Holdsworth 1963 2 column theory Post. ligaments
Spinal Stability Denis 1983 CT Scan 3 column theory
Pathophysiology of spinal injuries Stable and unstable injuries- Stable-vertebral components will not be displaced by normal movements. Unstable-Significant risk of  displacements and consequent damage to neural tissues
Spinal Stability Categorized major spinal injury into 4 groups: 1. Compression Fracture 2. Burst Fractures 3. Flexion Distraction Injuries 4. Fracture Dislocations
McAfee et al .  determined the mechanisms of failure of the middle osteoligamentous complex and developed a new system based on these mechanisms
Wedge compression fractures  cause isolated failure of the anterior column and result from forward flexion. They rarely are associated with neurological deficit except when multiple adjacent vertebral levels are affected
stable burst fractures  the anterior and middle columns fail because of a compressive load, with no loss of integrity of the posterior elements
unstable burst fractures  the anterior and middle columns fail in compression, and the posterior column is disrupted. The posterior column can fail in compression, lateral flexion, or rotation.
Chance fractures  are horizontal avulsion injuries of the vertebral bodies caused by flexion about an axis anterior to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The entire vertebra is pulled apart by a strong tensile force.
flexion distraction injuries  the flexion axis is posterior to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The anterior column fails in compression while the middle and posterior columns fail in tension. This injury is unstable because the ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments, and supraspinous ligaments usually are disrupted
Translational   injuries  are characterized by malalignment of the neural canal, which has been totally disrupted. Usually all three columns have failed in shear
Kelly and Whitesides   described the thoracolumbar spine as consisting of two weight-bearing columns: the hollow column of the spinal canal and the solid column of the vertebral bodies.
Classification of Spinal Cord injury Many Grading Systems Impairment Based Frankel ASIA Yale Motor Index
Type of bony injury Flexion  Extension  Flexion with rotation Compression
The spine should be protected during this initial assessment
Lumbar and Sacral Motor Root Function
The presence of an incomplete or complete spinal cord injury must be determined and documented by neurological examination
Important dermatome landmarks are the nipple line (T4), xiphoid process (T7), umbilicus (T10), and inguinal region (T12, L1), as well as the perineum and perianal region (S2, S3, and S4).
Complete /Incomplete spinal cord injury . Evidence of sacral sensory sparing can establish the diagnosis of an incomplete spinal cord injury  If voluntary contraction of the sacrally innervated muscles is present, then the prognosis for recovery of motor function is good
Some lumbar spine injuries may present as isolated root injuries with weakness of the foot or leg, depending on the specific root involved
spinal shock rarely lasts longer than 24 hours, it may last for days or weeks. A positive bulbocavernosus reflex  or return of the anal wink reflex  indicates the end of spinal shock. .
Bulbocavernous reflex
Anal wink reflex
If no motor or sensory function below the level of injury can be documented when spinal shock ends, a complete spinal cord injury is present and the prognosis is poor for recovery of distal motor or sensory function
Signs in an Unconscious patients Diaphragmatic breathing Neurological shock (Low BP & HR) Spinal shock - Flaccid areflexia Flexed upper limbs (loss of extensor innervations below C 5 ) Responds to pain above the clavicle only Priapism – may be incomplete.
Signs of spinal injury Forehead wounds – think of hyperextension injury Localized bruise  Deformities of spine - Gibbus, feel a step & Priapism Beevors sign – tensing the abdomen umbilicus moves upwards in  D 10  lesions
Evaluation Radiographic Evaluation Plain Xray CT MRI Mylography Spinal Stability Classification of Fractures Treatment of Specific Injuries
Imaging  evaluation  X- rays  CT scan MRI myelography CT scan significantly outperforms plain radiography however it should not  replace plain radiography  as a screening test  for evaluation of spinal injury
Radiographic Evaluation MRI Indicated in all cases of neuro deficit? Both intrinsic and extrinsic cord injuries Mylogram Replaced by MRI
SCIWORA Spinal cord injuries without roentgenographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) have been reported by Dickmen et al. to occur predominantly in children.
Spinal cord injuries in children frequently occur without fracture-dislocation. Because of the inherent elasticity of the juvenile spine, the spinal cord is vulnerable to injury even though the vertebral column is not disrupted.
SCIWORA  is most common in children younger than 8 years of age. The recovery of neurological function depends on the patient's neurological status at presentation.
Patients with incomplete injuries tend to recover, and those with complete injuries have a poor prognosis for recovery of neurological function
Pathophysiology Primary Neurological damage   Direct trauma, haematoma & SCIWORA < 8yrs old In 4hrs - Infarction of white matter occurs In 8hrs - Infarction of grey matter and irreversible paralysis  Secondary damage Hypoxia Hypoperfusion Neurogenic shock Spinal shock
Grading of Spinal Cord Injury
GENERALISATIONS (1) the greater the sparing of motor and sensory functions distal to the injury, the greater the expected recovery;  (2) the more rapid the recovery, the greater the amount of recovery; and  (3) when new recovery ceases and a plateau is reached, no further recovery can be expected
By definition, an incomplete spinal cord injury is one in which some motor or sensory function is spared distal to the cord injury.
Complete  - flaccid paralysis + total loss of sensory & motor functions Incomplete -  mixed loss  - Anterior sc syndrome - Posterior sc syndrome - Central cord syndrome  - Brown sequard’s syndrome - Cauda equina syndrome
An incomplete spinal cord syndrome may be a Brown-Séquard syndrome, central cord syndrome,  anterior cord syndrome, posterior cord syndrome,  or rarely monoparesis of the upper extremity. Ninety percent of incomplete lesions produce either a central cord syndrome, a Brown-Séquard syndrome, or an anterior cervical cord syndrome.
. A complete spinal cord injury is manifested by total motor and sensory loss distal to the injury. When the bulbocavernosus reflex is positive and no sacral sensation or motor function has returned, the paralysis will be permanent and complete in most patients
Goals of Spine Trauma Care Protect against further injury during evaluation and management  Expeditiously identify spine injury or document absence of spine injury
Optimize conditions for maximal neurological recovery  Maintain or restore spinal alignment  Minimize loss of spinal mobility  Obtain a healed and stable spinal column  Facilitate rehabilitation
TIMING OF SURGERY  The timing of surgery for spinal cord injuries is controversial. Most authors agree that in the presence of a progressive neurological deficit, emergency decompression is indicated
indications for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine injuries include burst fractures with 50% or more canal compromise, 30 degrees or more of kyphosis, late neurological deficits, and clearly unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations.
. In patients with complete spinal cord injuries or static incomplete spinal cord injuries,  some authors advocate delaying surgery for several days to allow resolution of cord edema, whereas others favor early surgical stabilization
decompression 1 anterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation 2 posterior  decompression and fusion with instrumentation 3 combined anterior decompression and posterior decompression
DECOMPRESSION  The role of decompression also is controversial  Compression of the neural elements by retropulsed bone fragments can be relieved indirectly by the insertion of posterior instrumentation or directly by exploration of the spinal canal through a posterolateral or anterior approach.
The posterolateral technique for decompression of the spinal canal is effective at the thoracolumbar junction and in the lumbar spine. This procedure involves hemilaminectomy and removal of a pedicle with a high-speed burr to allow posterolateral decompression of the dura along its anterior aspect
risk and complications of surgery, including inadequate decompression,  increased neurological deficit, failure of internal fixation, and the need for implant removal
Degree of canal stenosis no reliable correlation between the degree of compromise of the spinal canal and the severity of the neurological deficit.
Vertebral Compression Fractures They rarely are associated with neurological deficit, except when multiple adjacent vertebral levels are affected..
Medical   management  is the mainstay of treatment for these acute, painful compression fractures and includes bed rest, analgesics, braces, and physical therapy
Silverman showed that with each successive fracture, pulmonary force vital capacity was reduced by an average of 9%
minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques have evolved, acutely painful vertebral compression fractures can be treated with a percutaneous procedure termed  vertebroplasty.
This procedure entails placing large spinal needles into the fractured vertebral body through a channel made in the pedicle and injecting bone cement into the fractured bone
Balloon Kyphoplasty  has evolved as the next step in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. This is a minimally invasive procedure that involves reduction and fixation.
Posterior instrumentation posterior instrumentation is a safe and effective treatment for thoracolumbar instability  These implants have been developed because of the deficiencies of Harrington rods, such as breakage, cutting out of hooks, and loss of fixation
. Biomechanical studies suggest that these newer devices offer improved fixation, but because they may be technically more difficult to insert, neurological risks are increased
Anterior instrumentation has evolved significantly, now allowing correction of a deformity, stabilization of spinal segments during decompression, and bone grafting to be performed simultaneously. These implants are useful in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures
Anterior internal fixation devices allow treatment of mechanical instability and neurological compression in a single-stage surgical procedure
  ANTERIOR VERTEBRAL BODY EXCISION FOR BURST FRACTURES may be selected primarily or may be necessary in certain burst fractures left untreated for more than 2 weeks and not believed to be candidates for posterior instrumentation and indirect decompression of the spinal canal
Thank you………
Central cord syndrome   Central cord syndrome  is the most common. It consists of destruction of the central area of the spinal cord, including both Gray and white matter . The centrally located arm tracts in the cortical spinal area are the most severely affected, and the leg tracts are affected to a lesser extent
Central cord syndrome
Sensory sparing is variable, but usually sacral pinprick sensation is preserved  This syndrome usually results from a hyperextension injury in an older person with pre-existing osteoarthritis of the spine. The spinal cord is pinched between the vertebral body anteriorly and the buckling ligamentum flavum posteriorly
Incomplete cord lesion
Brown sequard syndrome   brownSéquard syndrome  is an injury to either half of the spinal cord  and usually is the result of a unilateral laminar or pedicle fracture, penetrating injury, or a rotational injury resulting in a subluxation. It is characterized by motor weakness on the side of the lesion and the contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation. Prognosis for recovery is good, with significant neurological improvement often occurring.
Anterior cord syndrome   Anterior cord syndrome is caused by a hyperflexion injury in which bone or disc fragments compress the anterior spinal artery and cord.
It is characterized by complete motor loss and loss of pain and temperature discrimination below the level of injury.
The posterior columns are spared to varying degrees  resulting in preservation of deep touch, position sense, and vibratory sensation.  Prognosis for significant recovery in this injury is poor.
Posterior cord syndrome Posterior cord syndrome  involves the dorsal columns of the spinal cord and produces loss of proprioception vibrating sense while preserving other sensory and motor functions. This syndrome is rare and usually is caused by an extension injury
A  mixed syndrome A   mixed   syndrome  usually is an unclassifiable combination of several syndromes. It describes the small percentage of incomplete spinal cord injuries that do not fit one of the previously described syndromes
Conus medullaris syndrome, Conus medullaris syndrome,  or injury of the sacral cord (conus) and lumbar nerve roots within the spinal canal, usually results in areflexic bladder, bowel, and lower extremities. Most of these injuries occur between T11 and L2 and result in flaccid paralysis in the perineum and loss of all bladder and perianal muscle control.
The  irreversible nature  of this injury to the sacral segments is evidenced by the absence of the bulbocavernosus reflex and the perianal wink. Motor function in the lower extremities between L1 and L4 may be present if nerve root sparing occurs.
Cauda equina syndrome Cauda equina syndrome,  or injury between the conus and the lumbosacral nerve roots within the spinal canal, also results in areflexic bladder, bowel, and lower limbs. With a complete cauda equina injury, all peripheral nerves to the bowel, bladder, perianal area, and lower extremities are lost.
the bulbocavernosus reflex, anal wink, and all reflex activity in the lower extremities are absent, indicating absence of any function in the cauda equina
Cauda equina syndrome widespread neurological disorder  Difficulty with micturition  Loss of anal sphincter tone or faecal incontinence  Saddle anesthesia about the anus, perineum or genitals  Widespread (>one nerve root) or progressive motor weakness in the legs or gait disturbance  Sensory level
Hypoxia Lesions above C 5  – damage  to diaphragm leads to 20% reduction in vital capacity  Lesions at D 4-6  – reduces vital capacity if < 500ml patient is ventilated Intercostal nerve paralysis Atelectasis – poor cough  V/Q mismatch Reduced compliance of lung – muscle fatigue.
Neurogenic shock Lesions above D6 Minutes – hours (fall of catecholamines may take 24 hrs) Disruption of sympathetic outflow from D1 - L2 Unapposed vagal tone  Peripheral vasodilatation Hypotension, Bradycardia & Hypothermia  BUT consider haemmorhagic shock if – injury below D6, other major injuries, hypotension with spinal fracture alone  without neurological injury.
Spinal shock Transient physiological reflex depression of cord function – ‘ concussion of spinal cord’ Loss anal tone, reflexes, autonomic control within 24-72hr Flaccid paralysis bladder & bowel and sustained Priapism Lasts even days till reflex neural arcs below the level recovers.
Thank you

Thoraco lumbar injuries

  • 1.
    Thoraco lumbar injuriesDr.Zameer Ali PG orthopaedics St stephens hospital
  • 2.
    Cervical - 7vertebrae Thoracic - 12 vertebrae Lumbar - 5 vertebrae Sacral - 5 fused vertebrae Coccyx - 4 fused vertebrae
  • 5.
    Some important factsSpinal cord ends below lower border of L1 Cauda equina is below L1 Mid dorsal spinal cord & neural canal space are of same diameter hence prone for complete lesion Mechanical injury - early ischaemia, cord edema - cord necrosis Neurological recovery unpredictable in cauda equina ie. peripheral nerves
  • 6.
    Thoraco lumbar injuriesFractures and dislocations of the spine are serious injuries that most commonly occur in young people. Nearly 43% of patients with spinal cord injuries sustain multiple injuries.
  • 7.
    Kraus et al.estimated that each year 50 people in 1 million sustain a spinal cord injury
  • 8.
    Of those whodie within 1 year of their accidents, 90% die en route to the hospital. Overall, 85% of patients with a spinal cord injury who survive the first 24 hours are still alive 10 years later compared with 98% of patients of similar age and sex without spinal cord injury.
  • 9.
    cause common ofdeath According to the National Spinal Cord Injury Association, the most cause common of death is respiratory failure whereas in the past it was renal failure.
  • 10.
    An increasing numberof people with spinal cord injury are dying of unrelated causes, such as cancer or cardiovascular disease, similar to that of the general population. Mortality rates are significantly higher during the first year after injury than during subsequent years.
  • 11.
    history A detailedhistory of the mechanism of injury is important but frequently is unobtainable at the initial examination.
  • 12.
    Statistics prevalence10 - 15 per million age group 18 - 35 years male/female - 3:1 RTA 51% - cars Domestic 16% Industrial 11% Sports 16% - diving incidents Self harm 5%
  • 13.
    most common causesThe most common causes of severe spinal trauma are motor vehicle accidents, falls, diving accidents, gunshot wounds
  • 14.
    type Cervical 40%Thoracic 10% Lumbar 3% Dorso lumbar 35% Any 14%
  • 15.
    Delay in diagnosisThe most common causes of misdiagnosis were head trauma, acute alcoholic intoxication, and multiple injuries. Patients with decreased levels of consciousness or comatose patients often do not complain of back pain.
  • 16.
    Delay in diagnosisProfuse bleeding from severe facial or scalp lacerations may divert attention from the cervical spinal injury
  • 17.
    Most isolated thoracicand lumbar spine fractures are related to osteoporosis and involve minimal or no trauma. In fact, osteoporosis-related fractures far outnumber trauma-related thoracic and lumbar fractures. Osteoporosis leads to approximately 750,000 vertebral fractures each year in the United States
  • 18.
    The annual rateof trauma-related thoracic and lumbar fractures is approximately 15,000 (14). Thoracic and lumbar fractures account for 30% to 50% of all spinal injuries in trauma patients
  • 19.
    In trauma patients,thoracic and lumbar fractures are concentrated at the thoracolumbar junction, with 60% of thoracic and lumbar fractures occurring between the T11 and L2 vertebral levels (15
  • 20.
    Neurologic injury occursin one fourth of thoracic and lumbar fractures associated with trauma
  • 21.
    Spinal instability Aspine injury is considered unstable if normal physiological loads cause further neurological damage ,chronic pain and unacceptable deformity
  • 22.
    Stability and Instabilityof the Vertebral Column The concept of spinal stability is central to the field of spine surgery.
  • 23.
    Spinal fusion andfixation surgery, in fact, is performed primarily to restore stability of the spinal column after instability from injury, degeneration, or decompression to address neural tissue
  • 24.
    Spinal instability isvariably defined, widely interpreted, and inconsistently measured
  • 25.
    Treatment and outcomeof spine injuries are integrally related to the neurological status, definition of spinal stability in trauma should be centred on preservation of neural function.
  • 26.
    Historically, discussions ofspinal stability have focused on the vertebral column and not on neural structures or neural function
  • 27.
    Functional spinal unitcomposed of two adjacent vertebrae and their intervening ligaments and inter vertebral disc,
  • 28.
    the anterior structuresare the vertebral body and the intervertebral disc, and the posterior structures are the facet joints, laminae, spinous processes, and posterior intervertebral ligaments.
  • 29.
    functional spinal unitis stable if all anterior structures plus one posterior structure are intact, or alternatively, if all posterior structures and one anterior structure are intact
  • 30.
    White and panjabi For assessing spinal instability Thoraco lumbar stability usually follows the middle column if it is intact then injury is usually stable
  • 31.
    Thoracic and lumbarspine stability score element /point score Ant. element unable to function….2 Post elem. Unable to function ….2 Disruption of costovertebral articulation …1 Radiographic criteria 4 Saggital displacement >2.5mm (2 points)
  • 32.
    Relative sagittal planeangulation >5 degrees…..2 points Spinal cord or cauda equina damage…2 pts Dangerous loading anticipated …1 pt Instability if score greater than 5
  • 33.
    Lumbar spine stabilityscale Ant. element unable to function….2 Post elem. Unable to function ….2 Radiographic criteria 4 pts Flex. /ext. x rays Saggital plane translation >4.5 mm or 15% 2 pts
  • 34.
    Sagittal plane rotation2 pts >15 degrees at L1 –L4 >20 degrees at L4 – L5 >25 degrees at L5-S1 0r Resting x rays
  • 35.
    Sagittal plane displacement>4.5 mm or 15% 2 pts Relative sagittal plane angulation >22 degrees 2 pts Spinal cord or cauda equina damage 2 pts Cauda equina damage 3 pts Dangerous loading anticipated 1 pt
  • 36.
    Roughly three typesof spinal instability are recognized First degree mechanical instability potential for late kyphosis E.g. severe compression fractures Seat belt type injuries
  • 37.
    Second degree (neurologicinstability) Potential for late neurologic injury E.g. burst fractures without neurological deficits
  • 38.
    Third degree (mech.andneur. Instability ) E.g. fracture dislocations/severe burst fractures with neurologic deficit
  • 39.
    McAfee Factors indicativeof instability in burst fractures >50% canal compromise >15 to 25 degrees of kyphosis >40 % loss of anterior vert.body height
  • 40.
    MULTIPLE SPINAL FRACTURESIf a spinal fracture is identified at any level, the entire spine should be examined with anteroposterior and lateral views to document the presence or absence of spinal fractures at other levels.
  • 41.
    Multiple-level spinal fractures,which may be contiguous or separated, are estimated to occur in 3% to 5% of patients with spinal fractures
  • 44.
    Multiple noncontiguous spinalfractures rarely occur without injury to the spinal cord.
  • 45.
    Denis developed athree-column concept of spinal injury using a series of more than 400 CT scans of thoracolumbar injuries
  • 47.
    Assesment of spinalstability 3 structural elements to be considered Posterior coloumn Middle coloumn Anterior coloumn All fractures involving middle coloumn and at lest one other coloumn should be regarded as unstable.
  • 48.
    The anterior columncontains the anterior longitudinal ligament, the anterior half of the vertebral body, and the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus.
  • 49.
    The middle columnconsists of the posterior longitudinal ligament, the posterior half of the vertebral body, and the posterior aspect of the annulus fibrosus.
  • 50.
    The posterior columnincludes the neural arch, the ligamentum flavum, the facet capsules, and the interspinous ligaments
  • 51.
    Denis classification Minorspinal injuries 1 Articular processe fracture (1%) 2 transverse process fracture (14%) 3 Spinous process fracture (2%) 4 Pars interarticularis fracture(1%)
  • 52.
    Major spinal fracturesCompression fractures 48% Burst fracture 14 % Fracture dislocation 16 % Seat belt type factures 5 %
  • 53.
    Compression fracture 4subtypes on basis of end plate involvement A fracture of both end plates 16% B Fracture of superior end plate 62% C fracture of inferior end plate 6 % 4 both end plates intact 15%
  • 54.
    Compression Fracture Failureof anterior column Stable: Tlso, hyperextension bracing Unstable (>50% height, >30% kyphosis, multi level) Progressive deformity
  • 55.
    Burst Fracture Failureof anterior and middle column Axial compression +/- failure of posterior column Compression or tensile force Most common at T/L junction
  • 56.
    Burst fracture subtypes4 subtypes on basis of end plate involvement A fracture of both end plates 24% B Fracture of superior end plate 49% C fracture of inferior end plate 7 % 4 both end plates intact 15% Burst lateral flexion 5 %
  • 57.
    Early stabilization isrequired in both saggital and coronal plane in patients with 1 neurological deficit 2 Loss of vertebral body height >50 % 3 angulations of >20 degree 4 Canal compromise of >50 % scoliosis of >10 degree
  • 58.
    Burst Fracture Neurointact <20-30 kyphosis, <45-50 canal compromise >20-30 kyphosis, >45-50 canal compromise Neuro compromised
  • 59.
    Flexion Distraction InjuryChance fracture ,seat belt type fracture Bone or soft tissue?
  • 60.
    Flexion Distraction InjuryType A one level bony injury Type B one level ligamnetous injury Type C two level injury through bony middle column Type D two level injury through ligamentous middle column
  • 61.
    Spinal Stability Holdsworth1963 2 column theory Post. ligaments
  • 62.
    Spinal Stability Denis1983 CT Scan 3 column theory
  • 63.
    Pathophysiology of spinalinjuries Stable and unstable injuries- Stable-vertebral components will not be displaced by normal movements. Unstable-Significant risk of displacements and consequent damage to neural tissues
  • 64.
    Spinal Stability Categorizedmajor spinal injury into 4 groups: 1. Compression Fracture 2. Burst Fractures 3. Flexion Distraction Injuries 4. Fracture Dislocations
  • 65.
    McAfee et al. determined the mechanisms of failure of the middle osteoligamentous complex and developed a new system based on these mechanisms
  • 66.
    Wedge compression fractures cause isolated failure of the anterior column and result from forward flexion. They rarely are associated with neurological deficit except when multiple adjacent vertebral levels are affected
  • 67.
    stable burst fractures the anterior and middle columns fail because of a compressive load, with no loss of integrity of the posterior elements
  • 68.
    unstable burst fractures the anterior and middle columns fail in compression, and the posterior column is disrupted. The posterior column can fail in compression, lateral flexion, or rotation.
  • 69.
    Chance fractures are horizontal avulsion injuries of the vertebral bodies caused by flexion about an axis anterior to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The entire vertebra is pulled apart by a strong tensile force.
  • 70.
    flexion distraction injuries the flexion axis is posterior to the anterior longitudinal ligament. The anterior column fails in compression while the middle and posterior columns fail in tension. This injury is unstable because the ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments, and supraspinous ligaments usually are disrupted
  • 71.
    Translational injuries are characterized by malalignment of the neural canal, which has been totally disrupted. Usually all three columns have failed in shear
  • 72.
    Kelly and Whitesides described the thoracolumbar spine as consisting of two weight-bearing columns: the hollow column of the spinal canal and the solid column of the vertebral bodies.
  • 73.
    Classification of SpinalCord injury Many Grading Systems Impairment Based Frankel ASIA Yale Motor Index
  • 74.
    Type of bonyinjury Flexion Extension Flexion with rotation Compression
  • 75.
    The spine shouldbe protected during this initial assessment
  • 76.
    Lumbar and SacralMotor Root Function
  • 77.
    The presence ofan incomplete or complete spinal cord injury must be determined and documented by neurological examination
  • 78.
    Important dermatome landmarksare the nipple line (T4), xiphoid process (T7), umbilicus (T10), and inguinal region (T12, L1), as well as the perineum and perianal region (S2, S3, and S4).
  • 79.
    Complete /Incomplete spinalcord injury . Evidence of sacral sensory sparing can establish the diagnosis of an incomplete spinal cord injury If voluntary contraction of the sacrally innervated muscles is present, then the prognosis for recovery of motor function is good
  • 81.
    Some lumbar spineinjuries may present as isolated root injuries with weakness of the foot or leg, depending on the specific root involved
  • 83.
    spinal shock rarelylasts longer than 24 hours, it may last for days or weeks. A positive bulbocavernosus reflex or return of the anal wink reflex indicates the end of spinal shock. .
  • 84.
  • 85.
  • 86.
    If no motoror sensory function below the level of injury can be documented when spinal shock ends, a complete spinal cord injury is present and the prognosis is poor for recovery of distal motor or sensory function
  • 87.
    Signs in anUnconscious patients Diaphragmatic breathing Neurological shock (Low BP & HR) Spinal shock - Flaccid areflexia Flexed upper limbs (loss of extensor innervations below C 5 ) Responds to pain above the clavicle only Priapism – may be incomplete.
  • 88.
    Signs of spinalinjury Forehead wounds – think of hyperextension injury Localized bruise Deformities of spine - Gibbus, feel a step & Priapism Beevors sign – tensing the abdomen umbilicus moves upwards in D 10 lesions
  • 90.
    Evaluation Radiographic EvaluationPlain Xray CT MRI Mylography Spinal Stability Classification of Fractures Treatment of Specific Injuries
  • 91.
    Imaging evaluation X- rays CT scan MRI myelography CT scan significantly outperforms plain radiography however it should not replace plain radiography as a screening test for evaluation of spinal injury
  • 92.
    Radiographic Evaluation MRIIndicated in all cases of neuro deficit? Both intrinsic and extrinsic cord injuries Mylogram Replaced by MRI
  • 93.
    SCIWORA Spinal cordinjuries without roentgenographic abnormalities (SCIWORA) have been reported by Dickmen et al. to occur predominantly in children.
  • 94.
    Spinal cord injuriesin children frequently occur without fracture-dislocation. Because of the inherent elasticity of the juvenile spine, the spinal cord is vulnerable to injury even though the vertebral column is not disrupted.
  • 95.
    SCIWORA ismost common in children younger than 8 years of age. The recovery of neurological function depends on the patient's neurological status at presentation.
  • 96.
    Patients with incompleteinjuries tend to recover, and those with complete injuries have a poor prognosis for recovery of neurological function
  • 97.
    Pathophysiology Primary Neurologicaldamage Direct trauma, haematoma & SCIWORA < 8yrs old In 4hrs - Infarction of white matter occurs In 8hrs - Infarction of grey matter and irreversible paralysis Secondary damage Hypoxia Hypoperfusion Neurogenic shock Spinal shock
  • 98.
    Grading of SpinalCord Injury
  • 99.
    GENERALISATIONS (1) thegreater the sparing of motor and sensory functions distal to the injury, the greater the expected recovery; (2) the more rapid the recovery, the greater the amount of recovery; and (3) when new recovery ceases and a plateau is reached, no further recovery can be expected
  • 100.
    By definition, anincomplete spinal cord injury is one in which some motor or sensory function is spared distal to the cord injury.
  • 101.
    Complete -flaccid paralysis + total loss of sensory & motor functions Incomplete - mixed loss - Anterior sc syndrome - Posterior sc syndrome - Central cord syndrome - Brown sequard’s syndrome - Cauda equina syndrome
  • 102.
    An incomplete spinalcord syndrome may be a Brown-Séquard syndrome, central cord syndrome, anterior cord syndrome, posterior cord syndrome, or rarely monoparesis of the upper extremity. Ninety percent of incomplete lesions produce either a central cord syndrome, a Brown-Séquard syndrome, or an anterior cervical cord syndrome.
  • 103.
    . A completespinal cord injury is manifested by total motor and sensory loss distal to the injury. When the bulbocavernosus reflex is positive and no sacral sensation or motor function has returned, the paralysis will be permanent and complete in most patients
  • 104.
    Goals of SpineTrauma Care Protect against further injury during evaluation and management Expeditiously identify spine injury or document absence of spine injury
  • 105.
    Optimize conditions formaximal neurological recovery Maintain or restore spinal alignment Minimize loss of spinal mobility Obtain a healed and stable spinal column Facilitate rehabilitation
  • 106.
    TIMING OF SURGERY The timing of surgery for spinal cord injuries is controversial. Most authors agree that in the presence of a progressive neurological deficit, emergency decompression is indicated
  • 107.
    indications for surgicaltreatment of thoracolumbar spine injuries include burst fractures with 50% or more canal compromise, 30 degrees or more of kyphosis, late neurological deficits, and clearly unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations.
  • 108.
    . In patientswith complete spinal cord injuries or static incomplete spinal cord injuries, some authors advocate delaying surgery for several days to allow resolution of cord edema, whereas others favor early surgical stabilization
  • 109.
    decompression 1 anteriordecompression and fusion with instrumentation 2 posterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation 3 combined anterior decompression and posterior decompression
  • 110.
    DECOMPRESSION Therole of decompression also is controversial Compression of the neural elements by retropulsed bone fragments can be relieved indirectly by the insertion of posterior instrumentation or directly by exploration of the spinal canal through a posterolateral or anterior approach.
  • 111.
    The posterolateral techniquefor decompression of the spinal canal is effective at the thoracolumbar junction and in the lumbar spine. This procedure involves hemilaminectomy and removal of a pedicle with a high-speed burr to allow posterolateral decompression of the dura along its anterior aspect
  • 113.
    risk and complicationsof surgery, including inadequate decompression, increased neurological deficit, failure of internal fixation, and the need for implant removal
  • 114.
    Degree of canalstenosis no reliable correlation between the degree of compromise of the spinal canal and the severity of the neurological deficit.
  • 115.
    Vertebral Compression FracturesThey rarely are associated with neurological deficit, except when multiple adjacent vertebral levels are affected..
  • 116.
    Medical management is the mainstay of treatment for these acute, painful compression fractures and includes bed rest, analgesics, braces, and physical therapy
  • 117.
    Silverman showed thatwith each successive fracture, pulmonary force vital capacity was reduced by an average of 9%
  • 118.
    minimally invasive spinalsurgery techniques have evolved, acutely painful vertebral compression fractures can be treated with a percutaneous procedure termed vertebroplasty.
  • 119.
    This procedure entailsplacing large spinal needles into the fractured vertebral body through a channel made in the pedicle and injecting bone cement into the fractured bone
  • 121.
    Balloon Kyphoplasty has evolved as the next step in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. This is a minimally invasive procedure that involves reduction and fixation.
  • 123.
    Posterior instrumentation posteriorinstrumentation is a safe and effective treatment for thoracolumbar instability These implants have been developed because of the deficiencies of Harrington rods, such as breakage, cutting out of hooks, and loss of fixation
  • 124.
    . Biomechanical studiessuggest that these newer devices offer improved fixation, but because they may be technically more difficult to insert, neurological risks are increased
  • 125.
    Anterior instrumentation hasevolved significantly, now allowing correction of a deformity, stabilization of spinal segments during decompression, and bone grafting to be performed simultaneously. These implants are useful in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures
  • 126.
    Anterior internal fixationdevices allow treatment of mechanical instability and neurological compression in a single-stage surgical procedure
  • 127.
    ANTERIORVERTEBRAL BODY EXCISION FOR BURST FRACTURES may be selected primarily or may be necessary in certain burst fractures left untreated for more than 2 weeks and not believed to be candidates for posterior instrumentation and indirect decompression of the spinal canal
  • 129.
  • 140.
    Central cord syndrome Central cord syndrome is the most common. It consists of destruction of the central area of the spinal cord, including both Gray and white matter . The centrally located arm tracts in the cortical spinal area are the most severely affected, and the leg tracts are affected to a lesser extent
  • 141.
  • 142.
    Sensory sparing isvariable, but usually sacral pinprick sensation is preserved This syndrome usually results from a hyperextension injury in an older person with pre-existing osteoarthritis of the spine. The spinal cord is pinched between the vertebral body anteriorly and the buckling ligamentum flavum posteriorly
  • 144.
  • 145.
    Brown sequard syndrome brownSéquard syndrome is an injury to either half of the spinal cord and usually is the result of a unilateral laminar or pedicle fracture, penetrating injury, or a rotational injury resulting in a subluxation. It is characterized by motor weakness on the side of the lesion and the contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation. Prognosis for recovery is good, with significant neurological improvement often occurring.
  • 147.
    Anterior cord syndrome Anterior cord syndrome is caused by a hyperflexion injury in which bone or disc fragments compress the anterior spinal artery and cord.
  • 149.
    It is characterizedby complete motor loss and loss of pain and temperature discrimination below the level of injury.
  • 150.
    The posterior columnsare spared to varying degrees resulting in preservation of deep touch, position sense, and vibratory sensation. Prognosis for significant recovery in this injury is poor.
  • 151.
    Posterior cord syndromePosterior cord syndrome involves the dorsal columns of the spinal cord and produces loss of proprioception vibrating sense while preserving other sensory and motor functions. This syndrome is rare and usually is caused by an extension injury
  • 152.
    A mixedsyndrome A mixed syndrome usually is an unclassifiable combination of several syndromes. It describes the small percentage of incomplete spinal cord injuries that do not fit one of the previously described syndromes
  • 153.
    Conus medullaris syndrome,Conus medullaris syndrome, or injury of the sacral cord (conus) and lumbar nerve roots within the spinal canal, usually results in areflexic bladder, bowel, and lower extremities. Most of these injuries occur between T11 and L2 and result in flaccid paralysis in the perineum and loss of all bladder and perianal muscle control.
  • 154.
    The irreversiblenature of this injury to the sacral segments is evidenced by the absence of the bulbocavernosus reflex and the perianal wink. Motor function in the lower extremities between L1 and L4 may be present if nerve root sparing occurs.
  • 155.
    Cauda equina syndromeCauda equina syndrome, or injury between the conus and the lumbosacral nerve roots within the spinal canal, also results in areflexic bladder, bowel, and lower limbs. With a complete cauda equina injury, all peripheral nerves to the bowel, bladder, perianal area, and lower extremities are lost.
  • 156.
    the bulbocavernosus reflex,anal wink, and all reflex activity in the lower extremities are absent, indicating absence of any function in the cauda equina
  • 157.
    Cauda equina syndromewidespread neurological disorder Difficulty with micturition Loss of anal sphincter tone or faecal incontinence Saddle anesthesia about the anus, perineum or genitals Widespread (>one nerve root) or progressive motor weakness in the legs or gait disturbance Sensory level
  • 158.
    Hypoxia Lesions aboveC 5 – damage to diaphragm leads to 20% reduction in vital capacity Lesions at D 4-6 – reduces vital capacity if < 500ml patient is ventilated Intercostal nerve paralysis Atelectasis – poor cough V/Q mismatch Reduced compliance of lung – muscle fatigue.
  • 159.
    Neurogenic shock Lesionsabove D6 Minutes – hours (fall of catecholamines may take 24 hrs) Disruption of sympathetic outflow from D1 - L2 Unapposed vagal tone Peripheral vasodilatation Hypotension, Bradycardia & Hypothermia BUT consider haemmorhagic shock if – injury below D6, other major injuries, hypotension with spinal fracture alone without neurological injury.
  • 160.
    Spinal shock Transientphysiological reflex depression of cord function – ‘ concussion of spinal cord’ Loss anal tone, reflexes, autonomic control within 24-72hr Flaccid paralysis bladder & bowel and sustained Priapism Lasts even days till reflex neural arcs below the level recovers.
  • 161.