Thrombin generation profiles in deep venous thrombosis

NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
J Thromb Haemost. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 March 23.
Published in final edited form as:
NIH-PA Author Manuscript

J Thromb Haemost. 2005 November ; 3(11): 2497–2505.

Thrombin generation profiles in deep venous thrombosis.

K.E. Brummel-Ziedins*, C.Y. Vossen†, Saulius Butenas*, K.G. Mann*, and F.R. Rosendaal†,*
* From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington,
Vermont and from the
† Department of Clinical Epidemiology and the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Center,
Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Abstract
Background—Reliable markers and methods to predict risk for thrombosis are essential to clinical
management.
Objective—Using an integrated approach that defines an individual’s comprehensive coagulation
phenotype might prove valuable in identifying individuals at risk for experiencing a thrombotic event.

Methods—Using a numerical simulation model, we generated tissue factor (TF) initiated thrombin
curves using coagulation factor levels from the Leiden Thrombophilia Study population and
evaluated thrombotic risk, by sex, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI) and
oral contraceptive (OC) use. We quantitated the initiation, propagation and termination phases of
each individuals’ comprehensive TF-initiated thrombin generation curve by the parameters: time to
10nM thrombin, maximum time, level and rate (MaxR) of thrombin generated and total thrombin.
Results—The greatest risk association was obtained using MaxR; with a 2.6 fold increased risk at
MaxR exceeding the 90th percentile. The odds ratio (OR) for MaxR was 3.9 in men, 2.1 in women,
and 2.9 in women on OCs. The association of risk with thrombin generation did not differ by age
(OR:2.8≤45 years>OR:2.5), BMI (OR:2.9≤26 kg/m2>OR:2.3) or alcohol use. In both numerical
simulations and empirical synthetic plasma, OC use created extreme shifts in thrombin generation
in both control women and women with a prior thrombosis, with a larger shift in thrombin generation
in control women. This suggests an interaction of OC use with underlying prothrombotic
abnormalities.
Conclusions—Thrombin generation based upon the individual’s blood composition is associated
with the risk for thrombosis and may be useful as a predictive marker for evaluating thrombosis on

an individual basis.

Keywords
coagulation proteins; numerical simulations; thrombin generation; thrombosis risk; oral
contraceptives

INTRODUCTION
Determining who is at risk for thrombotic events (venous and arterial) is difficult because
thrombosis is a multicausal disorder. Risk predictions are now based upon genetic factors
(antithrombin (1;2)-, protein C (3;4)- and protein S(5;6) deficiencies; factor V Leiden (7;8)

Corresponding author: Dr. Kenneth G. Mann, Department of Biochemistry, 89 Beaumont Avenue, University of Vermont, Given
Building, Room C401, Burlington, VT 05405, Tel: 802/656-0335, Fax: 802/862-8229, email:kenneth.mann@uvm.edu
Support: Supported by grants from the Program Project Grant No. HL 46703 (Project 1) from the National Institutes of Health (K. G.
Mann) and the Netherlands Heart Foundation 89.063 (F.R.Rosendaal). The authors have no financial interests to disclose or declare.

Brummel-Ziedins et al. Page 2 of 17

and prothrombin G20210A(9;10)), increases in coagulation factors (notably factor VIII(FVIII)
(11), FIX(12), FXI(13), fibrinogen) and environmental factors (obesity(14;15), oral

contraception (16;17), hormone replacement therapy(17), age (18), alcohol use (19) and
potentially smoking(20)). The heterologous presence of any of these circumstances in
asymptomatic individuals does not ordinarily necessitate clinical intervention.

The coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are composed of pro- and anticoagulant and
fibrinolytic components that maintain the balance of blood fluidity. Qualitative or quantitative
alterations in this hemostatic balance can result in hemorrhagic or thrombotic diseases. Current
laboratory evaluation techniques cannot fully identify subjects with an increased risk for
venous thrombotic disease and the ranges considered normal for blood coagulation and
fibrinolytic protein concentrations are broad (>100%). We hypothesize that an integrated
approach that defines an individual’s comprehensive coagulation phenotype might prove
valuable in understanding the dynamics of hemostasis and potentially identify individuals at
risk for experiencing a thrombotic event.

Thrombin generation is essential to hemostasis(21). This key enzyme can be described as
occurring in three phases: initiation, propagation, and termination. During the initiation phase,
exposed or expressed tissue factor (TF) binds circulating factor (F) VIIa and activates FIX and
FX(22). Minute amounts of thrombin are formed by direct activation of prothrombin by FXa

(23). Thrombin activates the essential components (platelets, procofactors FV and FVIII)
needed to produce the major burst of thrombin generation. The resulting assembly of the
membrane bound coagulation enzyme complexes yields the majority of thrombin (~96%)
during the propoagation phase(24). Clot formation occurs when approximately 10nM
thrombin-antithrombin is generated and coincides with the onset of the propagation phase. Any
thrombin formed after this is not detected by standard clot-based assays (e.g. the prothrombin
time, the partial thromboplastin time or the activated clot time).

Each individual’s blood composition yields a unique clotting profile (25–27). Hemostatic
disorders, whether genetic, environmental or therapeutically induced (27–31), produce major
alterations in these profiles. Several empirical technologies have been developed to directly or
indirectly measure the comprehensive thrombin generation profile (25;32–34). However, the
utility of any thrombin generation profiles in clinical diagnosis remains hypothetical.

In this study, we analyzed the theoretical thrombin generation profiles from a case-control
study of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS)(35) using
a numerical simulation model of thrombin generation(36). The phases of thrombin generation
obtained from the numerical simulations are evaluated relative to risk of DVT and compared

to an empirical synthetic plasma model using protein concentrations obtained from the LETS
population of interest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
HEPES and EDTA were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO). Brain
phosphatidyl serine (PS) and egg phosphatidyl choline (PC) were purchased from Avanti Polar
Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Recombinant TF was a gift from Drs. Roger Lundblad and Shu-Len
Liu (Hyland division, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Duarte, CA) and was relipidated (1:2000) in
PCPS (25% PS, 75% PC) vesicles by a previously described protocol (37;38). Human
coagulation FVII, FX, FIX and FII were isolated from fresh frozen plasma by using methods
described by Bajaj et al (39) and were purged of trace contaminants and active enzymes as
previously described (40). Recombinant full-length tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) was



provided by Dr. K. Johnson (Chiron, Emeryville, CA). Spectrozyme TH was from American
Diagnostica (Greenwich, CT).

Study population
The LETS is a case control study where 474 patients with an objectively diagnosed first DVT
(enrollment Jan 1, 1988 to Dec 31, 1992) were contrasted to the same number of sex and age
matched controls(35). The patients were selected from three anticoagulation clinics in The
Netherlands. The controls were acquaintances of the patients or partners of other patients.
Patients with known malignancies were excluded and all patients were younger than 70 years.
Blood samples were taken from 6 to 56 months after thrombosis was diagnosed.

Our thrombosis population for this study included 426 individuals (48 individuals were
excluded for being on oral anticoagulation) and a control population of 473 individuals (1
individual excluded for being on oral anticoagulation). For risk investigation, we subdivided
the populations into groups: men and women; women without oral contraceptives (OC),
women with OC, age ≤45 years old and >45 years old, smokers and non-smokers, alcoholic
beverages/day, 0-, ≤1-, 2–4-, 5–10 drinks/day) and body mass index (BMI) of ≤26 kg/m2 and
>26 kg/m2. When we investigated the effect of OC (as noted in Table 2) we excluded
individuals who were pregnant, post-menopausal, within 30 days postpartum or had a recent
miscarriage at the index date (ie. the time of thrombosis for patients). Since the median time

between occurrence of DVT and venipuncture was 18 months, we only evaluated women who
either used OC at the index date and the venipuncture date or did not at both dates. Seven
individuals were excluded from analyses involving alcohol since information was missing, and
three individuals were excluded from analyses involving BMI who were not 18 at the time of
the blood draw.

Blood collection and coagulation protein analyses
Whole blood (0.9 vol) was collected as previously described (35) from the antecubital vein
into Sarstedt Monovette tubes (Nümbrecht, Germany) containing 0.106 M of trisodium citrate
(0.1 vol). Plasma was prepared by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2000 g at room temperature
and stored in aliquots at −70°C until assayed.

All protein factor assays were previously performed and are either activity or antigen based
clinical assays (11;12;35;41–43). In brief, FII activity was measured by a chromogenic assay
using Echis Carinatus venom as an activator(44). FV:Ag was measured by an in-house-
developed sandwich-type enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with 2 different
monoclonal antibodies, both with a high affinity for the light chain of activated FV(42). The

FVII and FVIII activities were measured by one-stage coagulation assays(11;43). FIX and FX
antigen levels were measured by sandwich ELISA’s using commercial polyclonal antibodies
(Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark)(12;41). TFPI total and free antigen was measured with a
commercial ELISA (Asserachrom Total TFPI and Free TFPI, Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres,
France)(45). The TFPI free antigen assay is specific for free-circulating TFPI and does not
detect lipid-bound TFPI. TFPI activity was measured using a two-stage chromogenic substrate
assay as previously described. All three concentrations of TFPI were evaluated in our model
since we do not know which one is clinically the most significant. All of these percentages
were translated into Molar concentrations based upon mean published plasma values (46). The
mean factor levels for the populations are shown in Table 1. Note the broad range in
concentrations observed for the 899 subjects of this study.



Numerical model of thrombin generation
The numerical model as previously described (36;47) is composed of selected species that are

exposed to picomolar concentrations of TF and yield active thrombin generation profiles. The
mixture of zymogens, cofactors and inhibitors are described by 27 equations and 42 rate
constants(36). These numerical simulations of thrombin generation are comparable to thrombin
generation curves observed in empirical synthetic plasmas and whole blood (31;36;48–50).
For each individual in the LETS population we used their protein factor levels for FII, FV,
FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, antithrombin (AT) and TFPI (active, free, and total) and generated active
thrombin profiles that represent how much dynamic thrombin would have been generated in
each individual at the time of their blood draw. Each individual’s blood factor concentration
was entered into the computer database, Clot Speed II(36). Simulated reactions were initiated
with 5pM TF stimulus and solved for active thrombin over 1200s. Active thrombin is displayed
as a combination of thrombin and meizothrombin weighted according to meizothrombin’s
activity towards synthetic thrombin substrates. The outputs of these active thrombin curves,
are evaluated by parameters that describe the initiation, propagation and termination phases of
thrombin generation: maximum level of thrombin generation (MaxL), maximum rate of
thrombin generated (MaxR), time to 10nM thrombin (clot time CT), time to maximum level
of thrombin generated (TimeMaxL) and total thrombin generated (area under the curve, AUC)
(Figure 1).

Synthetic plasma analyses of thrombin generation
The procedure used is a modification of Lawson et al. (51) and van’t Veer et al. (40) and
involves mixing proteins, lipids and relipidated TF to produce a synthetic equivalent of in
vivo thrombin generation. I. Procofactor solution. Relipidated TF (10 pM; molar ratio
PCPS:TF=5000) is incubated with 4 μM PCPS in HBS (20 mM HEPES and 150 mM NaCl,
pH 7.4), 2 mM CaCl2 for 10 min at 37°C. FV and FVIII at selected mean concentrations from
the LETS population are added prior to the initiation of the reaction. II. Zymogen-inhibitor
solution. Prothrombin, FVII/FVIIa, FX, FIX, FXI, TFPI, and AT at selected mean
concentrations from the LETS population are preheated in HBS, 2 mM CaCl2 at 37°C for 3
min. The reaction is started by mixing equal volumes of both solutions resulting in the desired
concentration of the zymogens, pro-cofactors and inhibitors, 5 pM TF, 2 mM CaCl2 and 2
μM PCPS. Following the start of the reaction, at selected time points, 10 μl aliquots are
withdrawn from the reaction mixture and quenched in 20 mM EDTA in HBS (pH 7.4)
containing 0.2 mM Spectrozyme TH and assayed immediately for thrombin activity. The
hydrolysis of the substrate is monitored by the change in absorbance at 405nm by using a Vmax
spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).

Four experiments were performed: a) control women not on OC (mean of n=90; FII: 1.4μM,
FV: 25nM, FVII: 10nM, FVIII: 0.82nM, FIX: 83nM, FX:153nM, AT: 3.4μM, TFPI:2.9nM);
b) control women on OC (mean of n=47; FII: 1.5μM, FV: 22nM, FVII: 12nM, FVIII: 0.87nM,
FIX: 103nM, FX:189nM, AT: 3.2μM, TFPI:2.3nM); c) women with DVT not on OC (mean
of n=40; FII: 1.5μM, FV: 27nM, FVII: 12nM, FVIII: 0.98nM, FIX: 104nM, FX:183nM, AT:
3.3μM, TFPI:2.9nM); d) women with DVT on OC (mean of n=30; FII: 1.6μM, FV: 22nM,
FVII: 12nM, FVIII: 0.96nM, FIX: 108nM, FX:194nM, AT: 3.1μM, TFPI:2.4nM).

Statistical Analysis
We evaluated the effect of variables used to describe the initiation, propagation and termination
phases of thrombin generation on the risk of developing DVT by determining the odds ratios
(OR). We calculated ORs and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using the 90th
percentile levels for MaxL, MaxR, and AUC. The time variables, TimeMaxL and CT, were
investigated at the 10th percentile in order to investigate the faster CTs, which are



prothrombotic. To adjust for confounding by the other propagation variables (MaxR, MaxL,
AUC, TimeMaxL), we used a logistic regression model including all other propagation

variables (except CT) in the model as covariates when calculating the OR for MaxR, MaxL,
AUC and TimeMaxL. Subsequently, we calculated crude ORs and 95% CIs using the 90th
percentile levels for MaxR for subgroups (ie. men, women, women with or without OC,
individuals older or younger than 45 years, smokers or non-smokers, and different classes of
alcohol use or body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS
Thrombin generation profiles
The mean thrombin generation and the 95% CI in the control and thrombosis population are
seen in Figure 2, panel A. Active TFPI values, rather than total or free TFPI, were used in the
simulation of these curves. The control population had a mean CT of 393s(SD:80), a mean
MaxL of 412nM(SD:83nM), a mean MaxR of 3.0(SD:0.8nM/s), a mean AUC of 92μM(SD:
19μM) and a mean TimeMaxL of 730s(SD:96s) (Table 2). The thrombosis population was
shifted towards a slightly faster CT of 372s(SD:72), TimeMaxL of 698s(SD:87s) and MaxR
of 3.5nM/s(SD: 1.0nM/s), and a slightly higher MaxL 450nM(SD:96nM) and AUC 98μM
(24μM).

Thrombin parameters as predictors of thrombosis
We investigated the thrombin generation parameters for their effect on the risk of developing
DVT. Using a 90% cut off point for each of the individual variables, the crude OR for
developing a DVT was 2.6(95% CI: 1.8–3.8) for MaxR, 2.4(95% CI: 1.7–3.5) for MaxL, 2.2
(95% CI: 1.5–3.2) for AUC, 1.6(95% CI: 1.1–2.4) for CT at a 10% cut-off point and 1.6(95%
CI: 1.1–2.3) for TimeMaxL. When we adjusted the propagation variables MaxR, MaxL, AUC
and TimeMaxL for the effect of the other propagation variables, MaxR still displayed the
highest OR at 2.6(95% CI: 1.4–4.7) when adjusted for MaxL, AUC and TimeMaxL. The
adjusted OR was 1.0(95% CI: 0.5–1.9) for MaxL, 1.5(95% CI: 0.9–2.5) for AUC and 0.8(95%
CI: 0.5–1.3) for TimeMaxL. When total or free TFPI values were used, rather than active TFPI
concentrations, MaxR also yielded the highest OR (1.8 in the model with total TFPI and 2.9
in the model with free TFPI).

Association of thrombin generation parameters with risk in relation to classical risk factors
Individuals with DVT of both sexes had a faster CT, TimeMaxL and MaxR, a higher MaxL
and a greater AUC than controls of the same sex (Table 2). Using MaxR at the 90% cut off
point, men showed an OR of 3.9(95% CI: 2.0–7.5) and women an OR of 2.1(95% CI: 1.4–3.3).

We studied the effect of OC use by selecting women who were premenopausal, aged 15–49,
with no recent miscarriage or pregnancy and within 30 days postpartum. In this group, the OR
for MaxR exceeding the 90th percentile was 2.9(95% CI: 1.1–7.7). In women who did not use
OC, cases clotted faster than controls (mean difference 51s, 95% CI: 21–81s), had higher levels
of thrombin (mean difference 76nM, 95% CI: 36–116nM) generated at a faster rate and time
(mean difference 69s, 95% CI: 35–103s) and more total thrombin was present (mean difference
14μM•s, 95% CI: 3–25μM•s) (Figure 2, Panel B). As none of the controls had levels of MaxR
above the 90th percentile, we calculated the OR for developing DVT at the 75th percentile
where the OR was 8.8 (95% CI: 3.2–23.7) for women without OC use.

Contraceptive use consistent between the index date and the venipuncture date, affected both
the DVT and control populations by increasing the thrombin parameters. However, in women
with a DVT (Figure 3B), thrombin parameters were not as increased upon OC use as in the
control population (Figure 3A) upon OC use. The increase in thrombin generation parameters



with OC use in women with DVT was as follows: CT by 47s(95% CI: 9–85s), MaxR by 0.7nM/
s(95% CI:0.1–1.3nM/s) and TimeMaxL by 58s (95% CI:13–103s). No significant decrease

was seen for MaxL (mean difference 56nM, 95% CI:-2–114s) and AUC 11μM•s(95% CI:-4–
26μM•s). In the control women upon OC use, the thrombin parameters increased as follows:
CT by 97s(95% CI: 72–122s), MaxL by 84nM(95% CI: 54–114s), AUC by 13μM•s(95% CI:
6–20μM•s), MaxR by 1.1nM/s(95% CI:0.8–1.4nM/s (same)) and TimeMaxL by 125s (95%
CI:94–156s).

The OR for DVT of MaxR was 2.9 in women on OC hormones with an increase in MaxR of
19% in women with DVT on OC versus those not on OC and 36% in control women on OC
versus those not on OC. As well, women with a DVT who used OCs had a 54% faster MaxR
than control women who did not use OC (Fig. 2, panel D). Their coagulation profiles were
increased over the controls by: CT: 98s(95% CI: 66–130s), MaxL: 132nM(CI: 86–178nM),
AUC: 25μM•s(CI: 14–36μM•s), MaxR: 1.5s(95% CI: 1.1–1.9 nM/s), TimeMaxL: 127s(95%
CI: 89–165s). The OR at the 75th percentile for women with DVT on OC use versus control
women not on OC use was 27.7(95% CI: 9.2–82.9).

The mean factor levels of the OC populations (thrombosis and control) shown in Figure 3A
and 3B were used in empirical reconstructed plasma experiments with the same TF stimulus
used in the numerical simulations. These results are shown in panel B and C of Figure 3. By

recapitulating the mean procoagulant and anticoagulant protein profiles of the LETS
individuals identified for each curve on a phospholipid surface (see Methods), we obtain similar
patterns of OC effect on thrombin generation that is seen in the numerical simulations. In both
the control and women with DVT, thrombin generation is accelerated in women that used OC.
For the control women not on OC use versus the control women on OC use, the thrombin
parameters increased from: 312s to 243s for CT, 1nM/s to 1.9nM/s for MaxR, 236nM to 262nM
for MaxL, 54μM to 62μM for AUC and 540s to 420s for TimeMaxL(Figure 3, panel C). In
comparing women with a DVT not on OC use versus women with DVT on OC use, the
thrombin parameters increased from: 219s to 195s for CT, 1.6nM/s to1.8nM/s for MaxR,
289nM to 299nM for MaxL, 69μM to 68μM for AUC and 420s to 360s for TimeMaxL(Figure
3, panel D). The most prothrombotic profile was seen in women who had had a DVT and were
still using OCs at the time of the blood draw, followed by healthy control women using OCs
at the index and blood draw date. The least prothrombotic curves were in healthy women not
using OCs. Since MaxR is the most predictive parameter in the numerical model, our empirical
experiments show that OC use effected MaxR in the control women by a 90% increase, whereas
in the DVT population, OC use effected MaxR by only 12%. Thus, this demonstrates that OC
use effects empirically generated thrombin generation to a greater degree in control women
than women with DVT as was also determined with numerically simulated thrombin

generation. The similarities between the empirical experiments and the numerical simulation
results also validates the rate constants chosen for use in the computational model for the
components that are present which include, FII, FV, FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, AT, TFPI.

Thrombin generation profiles were associated with thrombosis for all ages tested: using high
MaxR yielded an OR of 2.8 for individuals <45 years old and an OR of 2.5 for individuals >45
years old (Table 2). Thrombin generation was associated with risk for different classes of
obesity: among those with a BMI <=26 kg/m2, high MaxR showed an OR of 2.9, and 2.3 in
those with a BMI > 26 kg/m2. The association between thrombin generation and the risk of
developing DVT for different classes of alcohol consumption was: 6.3(95% CI: 0.6–64.9) for
5–10 drinks per day, 2.7(95% CI: 1.2–6.0) for 2–4 drinks per day, 2.0(95% CI: 1.2–3.4) for
<=1 drink per day and 3.2(95% CI: 1.6–6.3) for the non drinking population. Note that the 95%
CI in all of these categories is wide. The OR for developing DVT associated with thrombin
generation was 2.5 in smokers and 2.7 in non-smokers.



DISCUSSION

The predicted composition based capacity for thrombin generation in response to a TF
challenge represents an integrative method to identify an individual’s propensity for developing
DVT. The most influential variable was the MaxR, which, corrected for by all propagation
phase variables (except CT), resulted in an OR of 2.6(95% CI: 1.8-3.8) for the highest 10
percent of MaxR values. The use of the numerical simulation model allows for the combination
of the results of the individual reactions into a complete ensemble describing not only the
observed progress in thrombin formation but also the activation progress for each of the
proteins as intermediates in the path towards thrombin formation. These results were verified
by recapitulating thrombin generation based upon the protein profiles of the specified LETS
population in a synthetic plasma model. Therefore, the individual’s hemostatic profile is
translated into a defined pattern, which can be used as an evaluation tool for thrombosis risk,
potentially with the ability to influence clinical decision making. Our results show that there
may exist subthreshold venous thrombosis states in individuals (ie. OC use) that depend only
on a trigger, which will create a heightened prothrombotic state that presents itself upon
challenge. Thus, illustrating that evaluating comprehensive thrombin generation via an
individual’s protein profile can be a measure of an individual’s prothrombotic state.

Understanding the relationship of TF initiated thrombin generation to clinical outcome has

been hindered by the absence of comprehensive assays and in the ability to collect blood from
patients during a hemostatic challenge. The use of the numerical simulation model enables the
estimation of TF initiated dynamic thrombin generation using available tools (ie. patients’
factor levels). The numerical simulation method thus allows the evaluation of well-studied
clinical databases, such as the LETS population and compare dynamic thrombin generation
retrospectively to determined clinical phenotypes. Although these studies do not include the
contribution of the anticoagulant protein C pathway, the contribution of platelets, the contact
pathway or the vasculature, it does measure all the plasma pro- and anti-coagulant proteins of
the TF pathway to thrombin generation that are evaluated in current laboratories.

In this study, we translated the active thrombin profiles into thrombin parameters that
incorporate the initiation, propagation and termination phases of thrombin generation. The
principal regulator of the initiation phase of thrombin generation is TFPI, the stoichiometric
inhibitor of the factor VIIa-TF-factor Xa enzyme-product complex. Thrombin generation
simulations performed using either active, total or free TFPI values yielded similar risk
estimates. Previously it has been reported that for the LETS population, low levels of TFPI,
especially low TFPI-free and total antigen in plasma, constituted a risk factor for DVT (45).
In the numerical system, the difference between TFPI subsets is small. In previous numerical

simulations for healthy individuals (the LETS control group), the effect from any individual
protein on thrombin generation outcome was <9% (27); thus it is the interplay between the
procoagulants and the anticoagulants that determines the extent of thrombin generation.

MaxR was the most useful predictor of DVT. This parameter incorporates the velocity at which
thrombin is formed, and is obtained as the slope of the thrombin generation curve (Fig. 1). The
range of mean MaxR in the subpopulations was from 2.8–4.3 nM/s; with the cases between
3.3–4.3 nM/s and the controls between 2.8–3.8 nM/s. Previous studies of genetic bleeding
disorders have shown that in hemophilia the MaxR ranges from 0.2–0.5nM/s(52). From these
studies we can begin to evaluate a thrombotic point or threshold using MaxR in healthy
individuals.

During investigation of the influence of MaxR relative to risk factors, sex, age, BMI, OC use,
alcohol consumption and smoking, we found that MaxR was associated with risk in all strata



of these factors. MaxR was highest in patients using OCs. OC use is an established risk factor
for both venous and arterial thrombosis (16;53;54). We found that OC use strongly increases

a woman’s thrombin generation profile by affecting all three phases of TF initiated thrombin
generation in both case and control women. All of these women were premenopausal, age 15–
49, who had no recent miscarriage, were not pregnant, nor within 30 days postpartum and were
only selected when OC use at the index date was the same as at the time of the blood draw.
Previously, Bloemenkamp et al.(55), showed that OC use had a more pronounced hemostatic
effect in women who had suffered DVT with regard to the levels of FVII, FXII, protein C, AT,
protein S and APC-sr than in healthy women, suggesting the existence of ‘hyperresponders’.
Heightened thrombin generation in healthy women on OC use has also been shown
experimentally using special fluorogenic thrombin substrates and monitoring clotting in PPP
and PRP(56). We see comparable results, in that women with a DVT that are on OC use have
the most pronounced acceleration of thrombin generation. Our results in this study also indicate
that OC use had a larger impact on thrombin generation profiles in control women than women
with a diagnosed DVT. Since all of the simulated thrombin generation curves are initiated with
the same amount of TF stimulus, shifts in the thrombin generation curve are caused by other
factors that are present in these individuals. OC potentially causes a subclinical prothrombotic
phenotype in these healthy control women that may become apparent when presented with a
challenge. Since exogenous hormones are used by more than a hundred million women
worldwide as OCs or for postmenopausal hormone replacement, methods for stratification of

thrombotic risk are essential.

Since venous thrombosis is defined by a vasoocclusive event, the differentiation of cases and
controls is of temporal quality. The accidental occurrence of precipitating environmental
factors, e.g. trauma, may lead to an individual becoming a case, while another, with the same
thrombin generation profile, in the absence of those factors, will remain a control. This
amplification to generate thrombin in the controls may be only differentiated from the cases
by time. Hemophilia patients with severe FVIII deficiency do not all have similar bleeding
pathology. Potentially, the more thrombin they can generate the lower the bleeding risk.
Conversely, the more thrombin a “healthy” individual can produce the higher the thrombotic
risk when a risk situation occurs. Our model uses the combined influence of all of the plasma
pro- and anticoagulants of the TF pathway on dynamic thrombin generation. Overall, our
results suggest that evaluating hypothetical thrombin generation based upon the individual’s
blood composition may be useful as a predictive marker for evaluating thrombosis.

Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Kihachiro Umezaki for his work on writing the computer software to handle large databases
in the numerical simulation model.

References
1. van Boven HH, Lane DA. Antithrombin and its inherited deficiency states. Semin Hematol 1997;34
(3):188–204. [PubMed: 9241705]
2. Harper PL, Luddington RJ, Daly M, Bruce D, Williamson D, Edgar PF, Perry DJ, Carrell RW. The
incidence of dysfunctional antithrombin variants: four cases in 210 patients with thromboembolic
disease. Br J Haematol 1991;77(3):360–364. [PubMed: 2012760]
3. Lu D, Bovill EG, Long GL. Molecular mechanism for familial protein C deficiency and thrombosis
in protein C Vermont (Glu20-->Ala and Val34-->Met). J Biol Chem 1994;269(46):29032–29038.
[PubMed: 7961868]
4. Reiner AP, Siscovick DS, Rosendaal FR. Hemostatic risk factors and arterial thrombotic disease.
Thromb Haemost 2001;85(4):584–595. [PubMed: 11341490]



5. Patel RK, Ford E, Thumpston J, Arya R. Risk factors for venous thrombosis in the black population.

6. Bhattacharyya M, Kannan M, Chaudhry VP, Saxena R. Venous thrombosis: prevalence of
prothrombotic defects in north Indian population. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2003;46(4):621–624.
[PubMed: 15025358]
7. Doggen CJ, Cats VM, Bertina RM, Rosendaal FR. Interaction of coagulation defects and cardiovascular
risk factors: increased risk of myocardial infarction associated with factor V Leiden or prothrombin
20210A. Circulation 1998;97(11):1037–1041. [PubMed: 9531249]
8. Nicolaes GA, Dahlbäck B. Activated protein C resistance (FV(Leiden)) and thrombosis: factor V
mutations causing hypercoagulable states. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2003;17(1):37–61.
[PubMed: 12627662]vi.
9. Franco RF, Trip MD, ten Cate H, van den Ende A, Prins MH, Kastelein JJ, Reitsma PH. The 20210
G-->A mutation in the 3′-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene and the risk for arterial
thrombotic disease. Br J Haematol 1999;104(1):50–54. [PubMed: 10027711]
10. Butt C, Zheng H, Randell E, Robb D, Parfrey P, Xie YG. Combined carrier status of prothrombin
20210A and factor XIII-A L34 alleles as a strong risk factor for myocardial infarction: evidence of
a gene-gene interaction. Blood 2003;101:3037–3041. [PubMed: 12480694]
11. Koster T, Blann AD, Briët E, Vandenbroucke JP, Rosendaal FR. Role of clotting factor VIII in effect
of von Willebrand factor on occurrence of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995;345(8943):152–155.
[PubMed: 7823669]

12. van Hylckama Vlieg A, van der Linden IK, Bertina RM, Rosendaal FR. High levels of factor IX
increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood 2000;95(12):3678–3682. [PubMed: 10845896]
13. Lavigne G, Mercier E, Quere I, Dauzat M, Gris JC. Thrombophilic families with inheritably associated
high levels of coagulation factors VIII, IX and XI. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1(10):2134–2139.
[PubMed: 14521595]
14. Romano M, Guagnano MT, Pacini G, Vigneri S, Falco A, Marinopiccoli M, Manigrasso MR, Basili
S, Davi G. Association of inflammation markers with impaired insulin sensitivity and coagulative
activation in obese healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88(11):5321–5326. [PubMed:
14602768]
15. Rauramaa R, Vaisanen SB. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of a thrombogenic profile
in the obese: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31(11 Suppl):S631–
S634. [PubMed: 10593539]
16. Rosendaal FR, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Tanis BC, Helmerhorst FM. Estrogens, progestogens and
thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1(7):1371–1380. [PubMed: 12871270]
17. Rosing J, Tans G. Effects of oral contraceptives on hemostasis and thrombosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1999;180(6 Pt 2):S375–S382. [PubMed: 10368524]
18. Haapanen-Niemi N, Vuori I, Pasanen M. Public health burden of coronary heart disease risk factors
among middle-aged and elderly men. Prev Med 1999;28(4):343–348. [PubMed: 10090863]

19. Catena C, Novello M, Dotto L, De Marchi S, Sechi LA. Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and
alcohol consumption in hypertension: possible relevance for cardiovascular damage. J Hypertens
2003;21(2):281–288. [PubMed: 12569257]
20. Thorneycroft IH, Goldzieher JW. Venous thromboembolism. A review J Reprod Med 2003;48(11
Suppl):911–920.
21. Mann KG, Butenas S, Brummel KE. The dynamics of thrombin formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol 2003;23(1):17–25. [PubMed: 12524220]
22. Nemerson Y. Tissue factor and hemostasis. Blood 1988;71:1–8. [PubMed: 3275472]
23. Butenas S, van ’t Veer C, Mann KG. Evaluation of the initiation phase of blood coagulation using
ultrasensitive assays for serine proteases. J Biol Chem 1997;272(34):21527–21533. [PubMed:
9261172]
24. Brummel KE, Paradis SG, Butenas S, Mann KG. Thrombin functions during tissue factor-induced
blood coagulation. Blood 2002;100(1):148–152. [PubMed: 12070020]
25. Brummel-Ziedins KE, Pouliot RL, Mann KG. Thrombin generation: phenotypic quantitation. J



26. Mann KG, Brummel-Ziedins K, Undas A, Butenas S. Does the genotype predict the phenotype?
Evaluations of the hemostatic proteome. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2(10):1727–1734. [PubMed:

15456483]
27. Brummel-Ziedins K, Vossen CY, Rosendaal F, Umezaki K, Mann KG. The plasma hemostatic
proteome: thrombin generation in healthy individuals. J Thromb Haemost 2005; in press.
28. Cawthern KM, van ’t Veer C, Lock JB, DiLorenzo ME, Branda RF, Mann KG. Blood coagulation
in hemophilia A and hemophilia C. Blood 1998;91(12):4581–4592. [PubMed: 9616154]
29. Brummel KE, Paradis SG, Branda RF, Mann KG. Oral anticoagulation thresholds. Circulation
2001;104(19):2311–2317. [PubMed: 11696471]
30. Butenas S, Cawthern KM, van’t Veer C, DiLorenzo ME, Lock JB, Mann KG. Antiplatelet agents in
tissue factor-induced blood coagulation. Blood 2001;97(8):2314–2322. [PubMed: 11290593]
31. Brummel-Ziedins K, Rivard GE, Pouliot RL, Butenas S, Gissel M, Parhami-Seren B, Mann KG.
Factor VIIa replacement therapy in factor VII deficiency. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2(10):1735–1744.
[PubMed: 15456484]
32. Rand MD, Lock JB, van’t Veer C, Gaffney DP, Mann KG. Blood clotting in minimally altered whole
blood. Blood 1996;88(9):3432–3445. [PubMed: 8896408]
33. Hemker HC, Wielders S, Kessels H, Beguin S. Continuous registration of thrombin generation in
plasma, its use for the determination of the thrombin potential. Thromb Haemost 1993;70(4):617–
624. [PubMed: 7509511]
34. Rosing J, Tans G, Nicolaes GA, Thomassen MC, van Oerle R, van der Ploeg PM, Heijnen P, Hamulyak

K, Hemker HC. Oral contraceptives and venous thrombosis: different sensitivities to activated protein
C in women using second- and third-generation oral contraceptives. Br J Haematol 1997;97(1):233–
238. [PubMed: 9136971]
35. van der Meer FJ, Koster T, Vandenbroucke JP, Briët E, Rosendaal FR. The Leiden Thrombophilia
Study (LETS). Thromb Haemost 1997;78(1):631–635. [PubMed: 9198229]
36. Hockin MF, Jones KC, Everse SJ, Mann KG. A model for the stoichiometric regulation of blood
coagulation. J Biol Chem 2002;277(21):18322–18333. [PubMed: 11893748]
37. Lawson JH, Krishnaswamy S, Butenas S, Mann KG. Extrinsic pathway proteolytic activity. Methods
Enzymol 1993;222:177–195. [PubMed: 8412793]
38. Barenholz Y, Gibbes D, Litman BJ, Goll J, Thompson TE, Carlson RD. A simple method for the
preparation of homogeneous phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry 1977;16(12):2806–2810.
[PubMed: 889789]
39. Bajaj SP, Rapaport SI, Prodanos C. A simplified procedure for purification of human prothrombin,
factor IX and factor X. Prep Biochem 1981;11(4):397–412. [PubMed: 7312833]
40. van ’t Veer C, Mann KG. Regulation of tissue factor initiated thrombin generation by the
stoichiometric inhibitors tissue factor pathway inhibitor, antithrombin- III, and heparin cofactor-II.
J Biol Chem 1997;272(7):4367–4377. [PubMed: 9020158]
41. de Visser MC, Poort SR, Vos HL, Rosendaal FR, Bertina RM. Factor X levels, polymorphisms in

the promoter region of factor X, and the risk of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2001;85(6):
1011–1017. [PubMed: 11434677]
42. Kamphuisen PW, Rosendaal FR, Eikenboom JC, Bos R, Bertina RM. Factor V antigen levels and
venous thrombosis: risk profile, interaction with factor V leiden, and relation with factor VIII antigen
levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20(5):1382–1386. [PubMed: 10807757]
43. Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, van der Velden PA, Briët E, Vandenbroucke JP. Factor VII
and fibrinogen levels as risk factors for venous thrombosis. A case-control study of plasma levels
and DNA polymorphisms--the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS). Thromb Haemost 1994;71(6):
719–722. [PubMed: 7974338]
44. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM. A common genetic variation in the 3′-untranslated
region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase
in venous thrombosis. Blood 1996;88(10):3698–3703. [PubMed: 8916933]
45. Dahm A, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Bendz B, Rosendaal F, Bertina RM, Sandset PM. Low levels of
tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood 2003;101(11):
4387–4392. [PubMed: 12560220]



46. Brummel-Ziedins K, Orfeo T, Jenny NS, Everse SJ, Mann KG. Blood coagulation and fibrinolysis.
In: Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology, 11th Edition. Lee GR, Forester J, Lukens J, Paraskevas F, Greer

JP and Rodgers GM (eds) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2003.
47. Jones KC, Mann KG. A model for the tissue factor pathway to thrombin. II. A mathematical simulation
[published erratum appears in J Biol Chem 1995 Apr 14;270(15):9026]. J Biol Chem 1994;269(37):
23367–23373. [PubMed: 8083242]
48. Adams TE, Everse SJ, Mann KG. Predicting the pharmacology of thrombin inhibitors. J Thromb
Haemost 2003;1:1024–1027. [PubMed: 12871372]
49. Butenas S, Orfeo T, Gissel MT, Brummel KE, Mann KG. The significance of circulating factor IXa
in blood. J Biol Chem 2004;279(22):22875–22882. [PubMed: 15039440]
50. Orfeo T, Brufatto N, Nesheim ME, Xu H, Butenas S, Mann KG. The factor V activation paradox. J
Biol Chem 2004;279(19):19580–19591. [PubMed: 14982929]
51. Lawson JH, Kalafatis M, Stram S, Mann KG. A model for the tissue factor pathway to thrombin. I.
An empirical study. J Biol Chem 1994;269(37):23357–23366. [PubMed: 8083241]
52. Butenas S, Brummel KE, Branda RF, Paradis SG, Mann KG. Mechanism of factor VIIa-dependent
coagulation in hemophilia blood. Blood 2002;99(3):923–930. [PubMed: 11806995]
53. Tanis BC, Rosendaal FR. Venous and arterial thrombosis during oral contraceptive use: risks and
risk factors. Semin Vasc Med 2003;3(1):69–84. [PubMed: 15199494]
54. Vandenbroucke JP, Rosing J, Bloemenkamp KW, Middeldorp S, Helmerhorst FM, Bouma BN,
Rosendaal FR. Oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344(20):

1527–1535. [PubMed: 11357157]
55. Bloemenkamp KW, Rosendaal FR, Helmerhorst FM, Koster T, Bertina RM, Vandenbroucke JP.
Hemostatic effects of oral contraceptives in women who developed deep-vein thrombosis while using
oral contraceptives. Thromb Haemost 1998;80(3):382–387. [PubMed: 9759614]
56. Hemker HC, Al Dieri R, Beguin S. Thrombin generation assays: accruing clinical relevance. Curr
Opin Hematol 2004;11(3):170–175. [PubMed: 15257016]



Figure 1. A numerical simulation of an active thrombin profile illustrating the thrombin
parameters
The clinical profile on an individual containing the concentration for factors II, V, VII/VIIa,
VIII, IX, X, AT and TFPI was used to initiate coagulation in the presence of a 5pM TF stimulus.
Active thrombin was evaluated using the parameters, time to 10nM thrombin (CT), maximum
rate of thrombin generation (MaxR), maximum level of thrombin generated (MaxL), time to
maximum level of thrombin generated (TimeMaxL) and area under the curve (AUC).



Figure 2. Comparison of selected active thrombin profiles for the control and deep vein thrombosis
populations
These active thrombin generation curves are shown as the mean and 95% confidence interval
of the population selected. A) The DVT population (n=426, left curve) is compared to the
control population (n=473, right curve). B) Women without OCs are compared between the
DVT population (n=40, left curve) and the control population (n=90, right curve). C) Women
with OCs are compared between the DVT population (n=30, left curve) and the control
population (n=47, right curve). D) Women with DVT on OCs (n=30, left curve) and the control
population not on OCs (n=90, right curve) are compared.



Figure 3. OC effect on theoretical and empirical thrombin generation
Thrombin generation simulations under a 5 pM TF stimulus are shown as the mean and the
95% confidence interval for (A) control women with (n=47) and without (n=90) OC use and
(B) Women with DVT with (n=30) and without (n=40) OC use. The mean factor levels of the
selected populations shown in panel A and B were recapitulated in a synthetic plasma model
with 2μM phospholipids and a 5pM TF stimulus and are shown in panel C and D. (C) Control
women not on OC (mean of n=90; FII: 1.4μM, FV: 25nM, FVII: 10nM, FVIII: 0.82nM, FIX:
83nM, FX:153nM, AT: 3.4μM, TFPI:2.9nM) are compared with control women on OC (mean
of n=47; FII: 1.5μM, FV: 22nM, FVII: 12nM, FVIII: 0.87nM, FIX: 103nM, FX:189nM, AT:
3.2μM, TFPI:2.3nM). (D) Women with DVT not on OC (mean of n=40; FII: 1.5μM, FV: 27nM,

FVII: 12nM, FVIII: 0.98nM, FIX: 104nM, FX:183nM, AT: 3.3μM, TFPI:2.9nM) are compared
with women with DVT on OC (mean of n=30; FII: 1.6μM, FV: 22nM, FVII: 12nM, FVIII:
0.96nM, FIX: 108nM, FX:194nM, AT: 3.1μM, TFPI:2.4nM).



Table 1
Inventory of the LETS Case/Control population

Case Population Control Population

Protein Percentage Mean (SD) Range Percentage Mean (SD) Range
FII 108(17) 67–178 104(15) 63–153
FV 133(35) 41–305 131(33) 47–302
FVII 114(25) 53–200 110(22) 41–171
FVIII 141(35) 53–318 122(33) 49–232
FIX 109(26) 63–209 103(21) 52–188
FX 107(20) 58–174 103(17) 49–163
AT 99(11) 67–143 99(10) 63–125
TFPI total 94(21) 35–159 92(21) 46–171
TFPI active 118(18) 62–219 117(17) 72–198
TFPI free 89(32) 23–211 85(32) 20–275



Table 2
Comparison of thrombin parameters from the case and control populations

N Max CT,s mean (SD) MaxL, AUC, MaxR,nM/ TimeMaxL,s mean (SD)
R OR nM μ M•s s mean (SD)
(95% mean Mean
CI) (SD) (SD)

Whole 426 2.6 372(72) 450 98(24) 3.5(1.0) 698(87)
population – (96)
cases
controls 473 (1.8– 393(80) 412 92(19) 3.0(0.8) 730(96)
3.8) (83)
Sex/Men – 172 3.9 382(68) 442 98(23) 3.4(0.9) 713(81)
cases (89)
controls 201 (2.0– 412(80) 399 90(18) 2.9(0.8) 751(93)
7.5) (81)
Sex/ 254 2.1 365(75) 456 98(24) 3.6(1.0) 688(89)
Women- (100)
cases
controls 272 (1.4– 379(78) 421 93(19) 3.1(0.9) 714(96)
3.3) (84)
Females
without
OCa
Cases 40 8.8b 357(83) 464 101 3.6(1.2) 681(94)
(121) (35)
Controls 90 (3.2– 408(74) 388 87(15) 2.8(0.6) 750(87)
23.7) (65)

Females
with OCa
Cases 30 2.9 310(79) 520 112 4.3(1.2) 623(95)
(124) (29)
Controls 47 (1.1– 311(71) 472 100 3.8(1.0) 625(87)
7.7) (92) (21)
+OC
patients
versus −OC
controlsa
Cases 30 27.7b 310(79) 520 112 4.3(1.2) 623(95)
(124) (29)
Controls 90 (9.2– 408(74) 388 87(15) 2.8(0.6) 750(87)
82.9) (65)
Age (yrs)
209 2.8 366(78) 446 98(27) 3.4(1.0) 697(94)
<=45 - cases (106)
- control 223 (1.7– 398(88) 401 90(18) 2.9(0.9) 738(106)
s 4.8) (85)
>45 - cases 217 2.5 377(66) 455 98(20) 3.5(0.9 699(79)
(85)
- control 250 (1.5– 388(72) 421 94(19) 3.1(0.8) 723(87)
s 4.0) (81)
Smoke
Yes - cases 155 2.5 376(74) 449 99(28) 3.4(1.0) 707(90)
(107)
- control 168 (1.3– 392(85) 412 92(19) 3.0(0.8) 732(102)

s 4.5) (82)
No - cases 271 2.7 369(71) 451 98(21) 3.5(0.9) 693(85)
(89)
- control 305 (1.7– 393(78) 411 92(19) 3.1(0.8) 729(93)
s 4.3) (84)
Alcohol
135 3.2 372(76) 458 98(20) 3.6(1.0) 696(93)
None - cases (91)
- control 111 (1.6– 384(77) 417 93(18) 3.1(0.8) 722(90)
s 6.3) (79)
175 2.0 374(73) 439 96(24) 3.4(0.9) 699(85)
<=1 - cases (91)
- control 222 (1.2– 394(82) 410 91(19) 3.0(0.9) 732(103)
s 3.4) (83)
2–4 - cases 95 2.7 370(68) 453 99(23) 3.5(0.9) 699(84)
(94)
- control 124 (1.2– 396(82) 408 91(19) 3.0(0.8) 731(90)
s 6.0) (87)
5– 13 6.3 349(69) 511 119 4.0(1.7) 682(90)
10 - cases (174) (51)



N Max CT,s mean (SD) MaxL, AUC, MaxR,nM/ TimeMaxL,s mean (SD)
R OR nM μ M•s s mean (SD)
(95% mean Mean

CI) (SD) (SD)

- 11 (0.6– 395(92) 425 96(23) 3.1(0.8) 736(107)
controls 64.9) (101)
BMI kg/m2
206 2.9 386(78) 429 93(21) 3.3(0.9) 712(91)
<=26 - cases (91)
- control 275 (1.6– 409(83) 394 88(17) 2.9(0.8) 748(99)
s 5.0) (78)
>26 - cases 216 2.3 356(61) 473 103 3.7(1.0) 681(77)
(95) (26)
- control 193 (1.4– 370(72) 437 97(20) 3.3(0.9) 704(88)
s 3.8) (83)

OR: odds ratio calculated at the 90% cut off point using MaxR; BMI: body mass index; OC: oral contraceptives
a
These women were premenopausal, age 15–49, with no recent miscarriage, pregnancy, within 30 days postpartum or use of depot contraceptives only
and were only selected when OC use at the index date was the same as at the time of the blood draw.
b
The OR was calculated at a 75th percentile, since no control individuals were present at a 90th percentile cut-off point


Thrombin generation profiles in deep venous thrombosis

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Thrombin generation profiles in deep venous thrombosis

More from MD TIEN

Recently uploaded

Thrombin generation profiles in deep venous thrombosis