TLC2016 - Submit work here
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like1,711 views
The document discusses a session on technology-enhanced learning and the importance of consistency and scalability in managing Blackboard courses. It outlines planning, package contents, pedagogic approaches, and challenges related to the electronic management of assessment. Key lessons include the necessity of agreeing on roles, testing imports, and building internal capacity for support.
![About Bristol
26 April 2016
3
Image attribution: By Nic Trott (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikon_nic/7519208704/ ) [CC BY 2.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bristoluniversityjosephgliddonrogergardner-160426101801/85/TLC2016-Submit-work-here-3-320.jpg)
TLC2016 - Submit work here
- 1. "Submit work here" Teaching and Learning Conference by Blackboard, Groningen Roger Gardner and Joseph Gliddon Technology enhanced learning and education development team www.bris.ac.uk/tel 26 April 2016 1
- 2. About this session 26 April 2016 2 • Rationale • People and planning • Package contents and demo • Approaches to feedback • Support and training • Impact, challenges, lessons • Ideas for the future
- 3. About Bristol 26 April 2016 3 Image attribution: By Nic Trott (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikon_nic/7519208704/ ) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
- 4. About Bristol 26 April 2016 4 Image attribution: Adrian Pingstone - Photographed by Adrian Pingstone, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1336301
- 5. Question for discussion What things would be useful to have the same across multiple Blackboard courses? 26 April 2016 5
- 6. 6 26 April 2016 Image attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bitterjug/7670055210/in/photostream/
- 7. Rationale • Consistency • Better management of complex workflows • Scalability 7 26 April 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- 8. People • Important to have academic and admin leads • Agree roles and responsibilities at the start Roles and responsibilities template 8 26 April 2016
- 9. Project plan 9 26 April 2016 Image attribution: http://nyphotographic.com/ http://www.picserver.org/p/planning.html Planning template Requirements example
- 10. What’s in a package? • Instructions • Checklist quiz • Assignments (with rubric attached) • Extension group • Adaptive releases • Grade Centre columns • Student access to My Grades • Link to upload moderation forms 10 26 April 2016
- 11. Demo and how to copy package • Instructions for bulk copy 11 26 April 2016
- 12. Pedagogic approaches 12 26 April 2016
- 13. Support and training • Responsibilities agreed in advance • Separate session for admin teams and markers • Build capacity by identifying and training up leads in admin team • Presence of academic and admin leads needed as questions often about policies and processes 13 26 April 2016
- 14. Reusable items 14 26 April 2016
- 15. Limits of packages • Some things require post import tasks e.g. setting due dates, or creating Smartviews for multiple markers • Limits on certain aspects of reusable items e.g. titles 15 26 April 2016
- 16. Impact – growth in marks / feedback online 16 26 April 2016
- 17. Challenges – packages in general • To package or not to package? (extent of support for minor differences?) • Reliance on Schools to provide accurate information 17 26 April 2016
- 18. Challenges – electronic management of assessment (EMA) • Difference in the user experience when using rubrics compared with inline grading • Limitations in anonymous marking functionality • Demand for more and better marking tools on mobile devices e.g. mark offline and sync 18 26 April 2016
- 19. Question for discussion What uses might you have for packages? 19 26 April 2016
- 20. Other examples at Bristol • Engineering support forum • Reading lists • Student rep spaces • Contextual variables 20 26 April 2016
- 21. Key lessons learnt • Spend time nailing the requirements • Test imports with small numbers first • Get sign off of data from the School • Build capacity in Schools to be first point of call for support calls and to maintain packages • If changing several aspects, it is quicker to clear out packages and import new ones 21 26 April 2016
- 22. Ideas for the future 22 26 April 2016 Image attribution: https://www.flickr.com/photos/buckaroobay/3721809183
Editor's Notes
- #11: what does a typical “Submit work here” package include? Instructions for students and staff A checklist quiz - used so that students have to agree to certain things before they submit work Submission point(s) - with access linked to completion of the checklist via adaptive release Rubrics for feedback Groups for students with extensions with adaptive release which allows later access to submission point Grade Centre columns for administration e.g. For application of penalties, comments e.g. to indicate extension and moderation Student access to My Grades A link for staff to upload completed Moderation forms