Downloaded 38 times
Uploaded byJohn Bradford
Topic 3- Cooperation and Collective Action
This document provides an overview of concepts related to cooperation and collective action, including prisoners' dilemmas, social dilemmas, and game theory. It describes several classic games involving strategic decision making, such as the prisoners' dilemma, tragedy of the commons, coordination games, and chicken. Key concepts are defined, like dominant strategies and Nash equilibrium. Examples are given of how these concepts apply to real-world situations involving competition and cooperation between individuals and groups.
More Related Content
Similar to Topic 3- Cooperation and Collective Action
Topic 3- Cooperation and Collective Action
- 1. Cooperation and CollectiveAction John Bradford, Ph.D.
- 2. Concepts to Know • Prisoners’ Dilemma • Collective Action Dilemma • Tragedy of the Commons • Dominant Strategy • Nash Equilibrium • Free Riders • Matrix and Decision-Trees (how to read)
- 3. Game: $100 Button Description: • You begin with a $100 and a button that you may push. You are playing with everyone else in the class. Assume that you don’t know anyone else in the class and no one will know whether you pushed the button or not. Your answers are anonymous.
- 4. Game: $100 Button Pushing this button has two effects: 1. When you push your button, every other player loses $2. 2. If you lose money because other players push their buttons, pushing your button will cut those losses in half.
- 5. Follow up questions 1. Would knowing any of the following conditions have made you change your mind? – Knowing the other players? – Talking to others beforehand? – Making your decision publicly? – Playing the game again? – Not being given the $100 to start with? 2. Which lines of reasoning, if any, were rational? How would you define rationality?
- 6. I. PRISONER’S DILEMMAAND OTHER SIMPLE GAMES
- 7. What are ‘Games?’ • Game Theory = the study of interactive, strategic decision making among rational individuals. – A ‘GAME’ in this sense is any form of strategic interaction! – The Key idea is that players make decisions that affect one another.
- 8. What are ‘Games?’ • Ingredients of a game: 1. The Players 2. Options (i.e. their options or possible ‘moves’) 3. ‘Payoffs’ – the reward or loss a player experiences
- 9. Prisoners’ Dilemma •Imagine you are one of two guilty prisoners. You and your partner in crime are being interrogated by the police, separately. You cannot communicate with your partner. • Each of you faces a choice: you can either CONFESS or NOT CONFESS. If neither of you confess, there will be insufficient evidence against you, and you will both receive only 1 year in prison. If both of you confess, you will each receive 5 years in prison. If you confess and your partner does not confess, however, you do not go to prison, but your partner goes to prison for 10 years. If, on the other hand, you don't cooperate and confess, but your partner confesses ('rats you out'), then your partner does not go to prison, and you go to prison for 10 years. QUESTION: DO YOU CONFESS OR NOT? WHY, WHY NOT?
- 10. Prisoners’ Dilemma CONFESSNOT CONFESS CONFESS 5 YRS, 5 YRS 0 YRS, 10 YRS NOT CONFESS 10 YRS, 0 YR 1 YR, 1 YR
- 11. PRISONER’S DILEMMA •It’s basic structure of the prisoner’s dilemma is this: COOPERATE DEFECT COOPERATE SECOND, SECOND WORST, BEST DEFECT BEST, WORST THIRD, THIRD
- 12. PRISONER’S DILEMMA •The ‘Prisoners Dilemma’ describes many real-life situations: – Cleaning dorm rooms: best thing for you is other guy to tidy up; but worst outcome is to tidy up for other person. What do you do? – Economics: firms competing, driving prices low. – Nuclear arms race – Pollution (‘Tragedy of the Commons’)
- 13. Social Dilemmas (individualvs. group) • Collective action dilemmas = situations in which the production of some group benefit is limited or prevented by the temptation to free ride (aka social dilemmas) • ‘Free Riders’ = individuals who receive the benefits from some collective action but don’t contribute. (aka ‘free loaders’)
- 14. Tragedy of theCommons • Tragedy of the Commons: individuals, acting independently and rationally according to each one's self-interest, behave contrary to the whole group's long-term best interests by depleting some common resource.
- 15. Public Goods Game • An experimental game in which people secretly decide to contribute or not to a public pot. • The tokens in the pot are then multiplied by some amount, and divided evenly to all participants, whether or not they contributed.
- 16. Types of Games • Here we will discuss two categories of games: 1. SOCIAL DILEMMAS (aka collective action problems) – Arise from a conflict of interests – Examples: Prisoners’ Dilemma 2. COORDINATION PROBLEMS – Arise from a lack of information – Examples: Deciding which side of the road to drive on
- 17. Coordination Games •Coordination games are a formalization of the idea of a coordination problem, which refer to situations in which all parties can realize mutual gains, but only by making mutually consistent decisions. • Example: Which side of the road to drive on? Left Right Left 10, 10 0, 0 Right 0, 0 10, 10
- 18. Coordination Games •Example: Shake hands or Bow? Shake Bow Shake Best, Second Worst, Worst Bow Worst, Worst Second, Best
- 19.
- 20. Describing Games •We can describe ‘games’ in three ways: 1. Verbally 2. Using a matrix (= table) 3. Using a Tree diagram
- 21. Describing Games 1.A MATRIX (table) most easily describes a simultaneous game (where players move at the same time, like the game ‘rock, paper, scissors’) – Note, however, that a matrix can also describe a sequential game; it’s just a little more complicated. 2. A DECISION-TREE is used to describe a sequential game (where players take turns).
- 22. Matrix Descriptions Rock,Paper, Scissors STEP 1: Write down the options for both players in a table. – Player 1 = row chooser – Player 2 = column chooser ROCK PAPER SCISSORS ROCK PAPER SCISSORS
- 23. Matrix Descriptions Rock,Paper, Scissors STEP 2: Write down the ‘payoffs’ (i.e. preferences) for each possible joint outcome. – Note that there are two different payoffs! ROCK PAPER SCISSORS ROCK tie, tie lose, win win, lose PAPER Win, lose tie, tie lose, win SCISSORS lose, win win, lose tie, tie PLAYER 1 PLAYER 2
- 24. Matrix Descriptions Rock,Paper, Scissors • By convention, the first number is the payoff to Player 1 (the row chooser). The second number is the payoff to Player 2 (the column chooser). – If you only see one number, it is always from the point of view of Player 1. – Below I use numbers, +1 to indicate a win, -1, to indicate a loss, and 0 to indicate a draw. ROCK PAPER SCISSORS ROCK 0,0 -1, +1 +1, -1 PAPER +1, -1 0, 0 -1, +1 SCISSORS -1, +1 +1, -1 0,0 PLAYER 1 PLAYER 2
- 25. Decision-trees • Decision-trees(aka tree diagrams) are useful depictions of situations involving sequential turn-taking rather than simultaneous moves. • Asking Boss for a Raise? Employee 0,0 Boss 2, -2 -1, 0
- 26. IV. DOMINANT STRATEGYAND NASH EQUILIBRIUM
- 27. Dominant Strategy •In Game Theory, a player’s dominant strategy is a choice that always leads to a higher payoff, regardless of what the other player(s) choose. – Not all games have a dominant strategy, and games may exist in which one player has a dominant strategy but not the other. – In the game prisoner’s dilemma, both players have a dominant strategy. Can you determine which choice dominates the others?
- 28. Nash Equilibrium •Nash Equilibrium: an outcome is a Nash Equilibrium is no player has anything to gain by changing only their own choice. – A Nash Equilibrium is a ‘best response’ to all other choices made by the other players in the game.
- 29. Nash Equilibrium Procedure: • Pretend you are one player (row chooser or column chooser) • Suppose that you believe your opponent is playing Veer. Find your best response to "Veer". In this example, your best response is to play "Drive", because 5 > 0. • Do the same for each of your opponent's actions • Now pretend you are the other player. Repeat steps 2 and 3. • For a Nash equilibrium, you need each player to be "best-responding" to what the other player is doing. My action is my best response to what you're doing, and your action is your best response to what I am doing. VEER DRIVE VEER 0,0 -2, 5 DRIVE 5, -2 -200, -200 GAME OF CHICKEN
- 30. Nash Equilibrium Procedure: • Pretend you are one player (row chooser or column chooser) • Suppose that you believe your opponent is playing Veer. Find your best response to "Veer". In this example, your best response is to play "Drive", because 5 > 0. • Do the same for each of your opponent's actions • Now pretend you are the other player. Repeat steps 2 and 3. • For a Nash equilibrium, you need each player to be "best-responding" to what the other player is doing. My action is my best response to what you're doing, and your action is your best response to what I am doing. Nuke Don’t Nuke Nuke -200, -200 -1, -100 Don’t Nuke -100, -1 0, 0 COLD WAR USA USSR