More Related Content
Similar to Types of Evaluation formative, summative.pptx (20)
More from Dr. Shaikh Kashefa Anjum Arefuddin (20)
Types of Evaluation formative, summative.pptx
- 1. Types Of Evaluation Formative And Summative Dr. Shaikh Kashefa Anjum Arefuddin Assistant Professor Marathwada College of Education, Ch,Sn, Aurangabad 431001 Maharashtra [email protected]
- 2. Types of Evaluation Formative Evaluation: It denotes the ongoing systematic assessment of learners achievement while the term ,Course or instrumental progrmme is in progress. It is the assessment mode during the instrumental phase to let teacher know about the learners progress in learning and what more is to be done
- 3. Purpose of Formative Evaluation 1)Feed back to the students(and not assignment of grade) should be the purpose of making evaluation of affective objectives. 2)Gathering data during the progrmme is being developed for guiding the developmental process.
- 4. 3)Provide the teacher with continuous and immediate feedback so that he can a) modify instructions b)Govern his instructional strategy c) prescribe group and individual remedial work 4) Provide the learner with continuous and immediate feedback so that he can get a) Reinforcement in successful learning b) Identify the learning errors c) Make suitable corrections for his errors.
- 5. Functions Of Formative Evaluation I. To collect vivid evidences of merits and demerits of any educational plan II. To discuss the plan on basis of limitations III. To remove the errors and pitfalls and make the plan more effective.
- 6. 1. It focuses on analysis of instructional materials. 2. It is cause seeking. seeks to identify influential variables. 3. Its design is explanatory and quite flexible 4. It monitors teaching learning strategy during instructions Characteristics of formative Evaluation
- 7. Advantages of formative Evaluation 1. formative Evaluation is concerned with judgments made during design and development of instructional program, can be modified and improved before it is completed. 2. Teachers test more frequently and are able to find out whether learning has taken place as planned. 3. A teacher is able to find many things that can be changed for the better during the course of instructional progrmme.
- 8. 4. It is helpful for immediate decision making that the learners face. 5. Emphasis is on achievement rather than objectives 6. Makes teaching more effective. 7. Provides opportunity to learners to have mastery over the content
- 9. II Summative Evaluation It refers to assigning a grade for learners achievement at the end of the term,semester, course or instructional program. It is making overall assessment or decision with the program.
- 10. Purposes of Summative Evaluation It provides an overall picture to the pupils by giving daily feedback. It should test the general level of the learners based on this judgment the effectiveness of teaching and instructions is evaluated Helps to assign grades or certify the learners mastery aver the content
- 11. Characteristics of Summative Evaluation 1. It is concern with broad range of issues and judgment about merits of already complied instructional progrmme. 2. It comes at the end of every instructional unit the duration of which may vary from semester to a whole year. 3. It is the terminal assessment of learners performance at the end of instructions.
- 12. 4. It determines the extent to which educational objectives have been achieved and if learners qualifies for the next level and extent to which learner has attained outcomes 5. It provides descriptive analysis and evidence that the programm is satisfactory 6. It gives feedback to the classroom teacher for success and failure of classroom instructions 7. It is un obstructive and non-reactive
- 13. Advantages of Summative Evaluation 1. It provides reinforcement to teaches and instructions 2. It helps in planning and organizing of further teaching 3. It judges to what content objectives are realized.
- 14. Difference between formative & Summative Formative Summative 1. It is thorough sampling of limited content area. 2. It is forces & reinforces learning by giving data that can direct remedial teaching 3. It is conducted during development and improvement of a program 4. Organized for the benefit of internal audience or decision makers. 5. It is a dialog between 1. It is restricted sampling across a large content area. 2. It is the final test of learns achievement covering large blocks content . 3. It is conducted after completion of the program or course of study. 4. Organized for the benefit of external audience. 5. It test learning outcomes
- 15. Formative Summative 6. It checks the final status of learners . 7. Frequency is less 8. Limited use of records & profiles 9. Methods Use :- daily assignments , tests, observations 10 . Scoring :- based on criteria on – referenced approached 11. Reports scores on each 6. It checks the final status of learners . 7. Frequency is more 8. Limited use of records & profiles 9. Well define evaluation techniques like achievement tests, projects etc. 10. Generally non referenced 11.Reports the attainment in terms of total scores average