BG
Uploaded byBert Granberg
PPT, PDF302 views

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11

The Utah Broadband Project's Winter 2011 report outlines provider participation in broadband mapping across Utah, specifically for the NTIA data submission. It details the availability of broadband services by various technologies across different counties, analyzing the percentage of housing units with access and those without service. Additionally, it provides insights into competition among providers and the demographics of service areas based on the 2010 census data.

Embed presentation

Download to read offline
Utah Broadband Project: Winter 2011Service Summary Bert Granberg UBP Mapping Lead Utah AGRC
Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission Covad Digis Direct Communications Emery Frontier Gtelco (Gunnison) Hughes InfoWest Integra Leap/Cricket Level3 Manti Myvocom Nebonet Qwest River Canyon Wireless SatView Skywire SouthCentral Spanish Fork Sprint/Nextel Strata T-Mobile ThreeSixty Union Utah Broadband Utopia Veracity Verizon Wild Blue XOCommunications XpressWeb Albion Telephone AllWest Altazip American Fiber AT&T Baja Beehive Bresnan Cache Broadband Catapulsion CentraCom Clearwire Comcast
Analysis Inputs
Winter 2011 Broadband Service Areas 47 Providers: Mobile, Fixed Wireless, Cable, DSL, Fiber Wireless Wireline
2010 Census Block Data
“ Trimmed Census Blocks” Only Populated Census Blocks population and housing unit counts Visually ‘Trim’ Unpopulated Areas Improved Demographic Density Capability Before After
Process For each Census Block: How many providers serve it? At what speed? Using what technology(s) Summarize Pop. & Housing Units for Counties Cities Unincorporated Named Places (ex. Brighton, Magna)
Preliminary Results
Mobile Availability MobileHUPct Percentage of housing units within county that have broadband qualifying mobile wireless service Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Unserved UnservHUPct Percentage of housing units within county that DO NOT have broadband qualifying service < 0.768 mbps download speeds, and < 0.200 mbps upload speeds Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet UnservHUPct
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Competition TwoPlusHUPct Percentage of housing units within county that have 2 or more providers offering services Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #1: Basic Consumer Case1HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 3 mbps+ download speeds, and 0.768 mbps+ upload speeds
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment Case2HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 10 mbps+ download speeds, and 3 mbps+ upload speeds
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #3: Higher Capacity Case3HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 25 mbps+ download speeds, and 10 mbps+ upload speeds
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
Bert Granberg [email_address]
Broadband / Cellular Drive Testing: July/August

More Related Content

PPT
Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation
byBert Granberg
 
PPT
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
bycomment.ofcom
 
PDF
Monarch E-Cycler Results
bysmallwhiteflower
 
PPT
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
byBert Granberg
 
PPT
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
byBert Granberg
 
PPT
2nd revised mark man v57 prof. de ungria chap15 designing and managing integr...
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 
PPT
Markman visual model chap 10 crafting the brand positioning
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 
PPT
20 year marketing plan by raymund pinon
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 
Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation
byBert Granberg
 
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
bycomment.ofcom
 
Monarch E-Cycler Results
bysmallwhiteflower
 
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
byBert Granberg
 
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
byBert Granberg
 
2nd revised mark man v57 prof. de ungria chap15 designing and managing integr...
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 
Markman visual model chap 10 crafting the brand positioning
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 
20 year marketing plan by raymund pinon
byRalph Raymund Pinon
 

Similar to Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11

PPTX
The Ever-Changing Landscape of Broadband from Connected Nation
byAnn Treacy
 
PPTX
Walker new digdivide_final
byWilPayton
 
PPTX
Southern Utah Technology Council 12-14-12
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PDF
South Central Ozarks Council of Governments Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
PDF
MD Broadband Map TUgis2011 Presentation
byTowson University's Division of Innovation & Applied Research
 
PDF
Southwest Missouri Council of Governments Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
PDF
Mo-Kan Regional Council Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
DOCX
Summary of Findings Regarding Broadband Availability in Utah
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PDF
Meramec Regional Planning Commission Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
PPT
Utah Broadband Project--Legislative Presentation
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPTX
Utah Rural Telecom Association Annual Conference
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPT
Utah broadbandproject utahdiggovsummitjune2012
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PDF
WFRC Plan Summary
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PDF
Data Informed Decisions Presentation
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPTX
Utah Broadband Planning Project Updates
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPTX
Utah Tribal Leaders Meeting
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPT
Utahbroadbandprojectstate911committee 110616130207-phpapp02[1]
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPT
Southern utah tech council presentation 4.8.11
byUtah Broadband Project
 
PPT
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
byBert Granberg
 
PPT
UT Rural Telecom Conf 3.16.11
byUtah Broadband Project
 
The Ever-Changing Landscape of Broadband from Connected Nation
byAnn Treacy
 
Walker new digdivide_final
byWilPayton
 
Southern Utah Technology Council 12-14-12
byUtah Broadband Project
 
South Central Ozarks Council of Governments Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
MD Broadband Map TUgis2011 Presentation
byTowson University's Division of Innovation & Applied Research
 
Southwest Missouri Council of Governments Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
Mo-Kan Regional Council Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
Summary of Findings Regarding Broadband Availability in Utah
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Meramec Regional Planning Commission Broadband Study Findings
bymobroadbandnow
 
Utah Broadband Project--Legislative Presentation
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utah Rural Telecom Association Annual Conference
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utah broadbandproject utahdiggovsummitjune2012
byUtah Broadband Project
 
WFRC Plan Summary
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Data Informed Decisions Presentation
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Planning Project Updates
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utah Tribal Leaders Meeting
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utahbroadbandprojectstate911committee 110616130207-phpapp02[1]
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Southern utah tech council presentation 4.8.11
byUtah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
byBert Granberg
 
UT Rural Telecom Conf 3.16.11
byUtah Broadband Project
 

Recently uploaded

PDF
The Necessity of Digital Forensics, the Digital Forensics Process & Laborator...
bychrstnpetwinchester
 
PDF
Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Log-Based Anomaly Detection: A Cas...
byMohammed BEKKOUCHE
 
PDF
ODSC AI West: Agent Optimization: Beyond Context engineering
byShashikant Jagtap
 
PDF
KMWorld - KM & AI Bring Collectivity, Nostalgia, & Selectivity
byJonathan Ralton
 
PDF
"DISC as GPS for team leaders: how to lead a team from storming to performing...
byFwdays
 
PDF
Cheryl Hung, Vibe Coding Auth Without Melting Down! isaqb Software Architectu...
byCheryl Hung
 
PDF
10 Best Automation QA Testing Software Tools in 2025.pdf
byRohitBhandari66
 
PDF
The partnership effect: Libraries and publishers on collaborating and thrivin...
byBookNet Canada
 
PDF
Top 10 AI Development Companies in UK 2025
bycollinmishell2
 
PDF
[BDD 2025 - Full-Stack Development] Agentic AI Architecture: Redefining Syste...
byWintari Yasmin
 
PDF
Cybersecurity Prevention and Detection: Unit 2
byVICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
PDF
So You Want to Work at Google | DevFest Seattle 2025
byMargaret Maynard-Reid
 
PDF
DUBAI IT MODERNIZATION WITH AZURE MANAGED SERVICES.pdf
byLogicEra
 
PDF
[BDD 2025 - Full-Stack Development] PHP in AI Age: The Laravel Way. (Rizqy Hi...
byWintari Yasmin
 
PDF
Rolling out Enterprise AI: Tools, Insights, and Team Empowerment
byAll Things Open
 
PPTX
Leon Brands - Intro to GPU Occlusion (Graphics Programming Conference 2024)
byleonbrands1998
 
PDF
Oracle MySQL HeatWave - One Page - Version 3
byLuca Bonesini
 
PDF
Lets Build a Serverless Function with Kiro
byChris Bingham
 
PPTX
kernel PPT (Explanation of Windows Kernal).pptx
byINFOBYTES1
 
PPTX
Guardrails in Action - Ensuring Safe AI with Azure AI Content Safety.pptx
byUdaiappa Ramachandran
 
The Necessity of Digital Forensics, the Digital Forensics Process & Laborator...
bychrstnpetwinchester
 
Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Log-Based Anomaly Detection: A Cas...
byMohammed BEKKOUCHE
 
ODSC AI West: Agent Optimization: Beyond Context engineering
byShashikant Jagtap
 
KMWorld - KM & AI Bring Collectivity, Nostalgia, & Selectivity
byJonathan Ralton
 
"DISC as GPS for team leaders: how to lead a team from storming to performing...
byFwdays
 
Cheryl Hung, Vibe Coding Auth Without Melting Down! isaqb Software Architectu...
byCheryl Hung
 
10 Best Automation QA Testing Software Tools in 2025.pdf
byRohitBhandari66
 
The partnership effect: Libraries and publishers on collaborating and thrivin...
byBookNet Canada
 
Top 10 AI Development Companies in UK 2025
bycollinmishell2
 
[BDD 2025 - Full-Stack Development] Agentic AI Architecture: Redefining Syste...
byWintari Yasmin
 
Cybersecurity Prevention and Detection: Unit 2
byVICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
So You Want to Work at Google | DevFest Seattle 2025
byMargaret Maynard-Reid
 
DUBAI IT MODERNIZATION WITH AZURE MANAGED SERVICES.pdf
byLogicEra
 
[BDD 2025 - Full-Stack Development] PHP in AI Age: The Laravel Way. (Rizqy Hi...
byWintari Yasmin
 
Rolling out Enterprise AI: Tools, Insights, and Team Empowerment
byAll Things Open
 
Leon Brands - Intro to GPU Occlusion (Graphics Programming Conference 2024)
byleonbrands1998
 
Oracle MySQL HeatWave - One Page - Version 3
byLuca Bonesini
 
Lets Build a Serverless Function with Kiro
byChris Bingham
 
kernel PPT (Explanation of Windows Kernal).pptx
byINFOBYTES1
 
Guardrails in Action - Ensuring Safe AI with Azure AI Content Safety.pptx
byUdaiappa Ramachandran
 

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11

  • 1.
    Utah Broadband Project:Winter 2011Service Summary Bert Granberg UBP Mapping Lead Utah AGRC
  • 2.
    Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission Covad Digis Direct Communications Emery Frontier Gtelco (Gunnison) Hughes InfoWest Integra Leap/Cricket Level3 Manti Myvocom Nebonet Qwest River Canyon Wireless SatView Skywire SouthCentral Spanish Fork Sprint/Nextel Strata T-Mobile ThreeSixty Union Utah Broadband Utopia Veracity Verizon Wild Blue XOCommunications XpressWeb Albion Telephone AllWest Altazip American Fiber AT&T Baja Beehive Bresnan Cache Broadband Catapulsion CentraCom Clearwire Comcast
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Winter 2011 BroadbandService Areas 47 Providers: Mobile, Fixed Wireless, Cable, DSL, Fiber Wireless Wireline
  • 5.
  • 6.
    “ Trimmed CensusBlocks” Only Populated Census Blocks population and housing unit counts Visually ‘Trim’ Unpopulated Areas Improved Demographic Density Capability Before After
  • 7.
    Process For eachCensus Block: How many providers serve it? At what speed? Using what technology(s) Summarize Pop. & Housing Units for Counties Cities Unincorporated Named Places (ex. Brighton, Magna)
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Mobile Availability MobileHUPctPercentage of housing units within county that have broadband qualifying mobile wireless service Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
  • 10.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 11.
    Unserved UnservHUPct Percentageof housing units within county that DO NOT have broadband qualifying service < 0.768 mbps download speeds, and < 0.200 mbps upload speeds Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet UnservHUPct
  • 12.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 13.
    Competition TwoPlusHUPct Percentageof housing units within county that have 2 or more providers offering services Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
  • 14.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 15.
    Class #1: BasicConsumer Case1HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 3 mbps+ download speeds, and 0.768 mbps+ upload speeds
  • 16.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 17.
    Class #2: HomeOffice/Entertainment Case2HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 10 mbps+ download speeds, and 3 mbps+ upload speeds
  • 18.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 19.
    Class #3: HigherCapacity Case3HUPct Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: 25 mbps+ download speeds, and 10 mbps+ upload speeds
  • 20.
    DRAFT County %of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 21.
    Services Classes MapNote: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Broadband / CellularDrive Testing: July/August