Recommendoma
Syndrome
Or
VIP
(very important person )
Syndrome
Muhammad Muhammad Al Hennawy
Senior Consultant Obstetrician &
Gynacologist
Ras El Bar Central Hospital ,Egypt
mmhennawy.site44.com
www.drhennawy.8m.net
Definition
• The presence of numerous unexpected and
unusual complications in recommended
patients that the treating physician is trying to
give a better assistance
• VIPs are given
• the best care,
• faster and
• greater access,
• enhanced and more convenient facilities, and
• special attention from physicians,
• VIP care can be singularly harmful
• Unfortunately, trying to provide better care
sets up the VIP for a higher complication rate
and a greater chance of death.
Recommended Or VIP Patients?
• It is a person given special privileges in view of
his or her status or wealth.
• Examples of VIPs include
• Royalty,
• Politicians,
• Celebrities,
• Corporate leaders,
• Wealthy individuals , and
• Medical personnel or their relatives
Names
• Recommendoma Syndrome
• Recommendosarcoma syndrome
• Syndrome of recommended patient
• VIP (very important person) syndrome
History
• This situation was first documented in a paper
published in the 1960s which noted that VIP
patients have worse outcomes.
• Then described by Dr. Walter Weintraub of the
University of Maryland School of Medicine in a
1964 paper,
• VIP Syndrome is shorthand for how the influence
of wealth and the allure of fame can cause
doctors to veer into risky territory when they
cater to stars.
Causes
Patients' Attitude
• Stars may reject medical advice
• Stars may demand ineffective treatments.
• Star-struck doctors may order unnecessary
tests or not enough.
• Chairperson’s syndrome is pressure from the
patient, family member, hospital
representative, or even the VIP patient to be
cared for by the department chairperson.
• A VIP may insist on the senior-most specialist
at an academic institution or teaching
hospital—the chair of the department of
medicine, or of surgery, for instance. But the
senior-most, or most eminent, caregiver is not
necessarily the most skilled at performing a
given procedure. Such an individual may be
out of practice, or no longer up-to-date, and
the "no name" subordinate may actually be
much more skilled.
Inefficient Use Of Health Resources
• Medical professionals can be vulnerable to clouded
judgment, and thus cause harm to their patients
• When physicians suffer a loss of judgment in the face
of the glamour and prestige of a famous client
• (Doctors Didn’t Follow Standard Practices because the
Patient was a VIP”)
• Absence of an adequate register of clinical data and
• Change in usual clinical practice on interpretation of
diagnostic tests as well as
• In the indication of treatment of these patients
• Every test has its own set of possible
complications. Each consultant feels
compelled to add something to the
evaluation, which usually means even more
tests, and more possible complications. And
once too many consultants are involved, there
is no “captain of the ship” and care can
become fragmented and even more inefficient
and dangerous.
• VIPs may be prescribed narcotics or other
controlled substances when an ordinary
patient would be denied them, or they may be
over-medicated with larger amounts of such
drugs than appropriate.
• VIP medicine can be extravagant and wasteful.
Excessive drug prescriptions may be written
and imaging studies ordered
• Using his or her status to influence a given
professional or institution to make
unorthodox decisions under the pressure or
presence of said VIP—that relates to the
accessibility and quality of health care
• When treating a V.I.P., doctors may avoid
giving bad news. In hopes of sparing their
special patient from pain or time-consuming
care, a doctor may opt to skip basic tests or
procedures — even though these exams may
have provided important information. The flip
side is that V.I.P. treatment may result in extra
and unnecessary tests
• Prominent or famous people who fall ill have obvious
reasons for desiring instant and ample medical care.
Additionally, they have a desire to avoid public scrutiny
in matters of private medical care, as all patients do,
and may demand special accommodations on this
basis. They may want to avoid the prying eyes of
journalists as well as those of the curious onlookers
among the hospital staff who may not be directly
involved in their care. Their desire for privacy is an
understandable aspect of their need for extra security.
Often the pressure on medical staff for special
accommodations comes from a VIP's entourage rather
than from the patient.
• Hospital administrators may meddle in
decisions if the patient is a potential financial
donor.
• Some observers object that, although it is not
surprising that those with fame or wealth
receive more attention when sick, it seems
unfair that they should get "better" medical
care than others, especially in cases where
scarce resources, including time, are
reallocated to accommodate them.
Like
• when former President Gerald Ford was
discharged from the hospital with the
diagnosis of an inner-ear infection when, in
fact, he had suffered a stroke
• Prince died of an opioid addiction that may
have been facilitated by physicians prescribing
too powerful a drug under circumstances in
which they were not licensed or registered to
prescribe them.
• Jackson's personal doctor, Conrad Murray,
spent two years in prison after his involuntary
manslaughter conviction in the King of Pop's
2009 death. Jackson had requested a surgical
anesthetic, propofol, to help him sleep, calling
it his "milk," according to trial testimony.
Prosecutors said Murray supplied the drug
and didn't notice when Jackson stopped
breathing.
• Another doctor took a cellphone photo of
Joan Rivers on the operating table, according
to a recently settled malpractice lawsuit.
That's a clear sign of clouded judgment,
Dinwiddie said.
Prevention
• The best way to prevent this "syndrome of
recommended patient" is to
• maintain, even within these patients, an
attitude based on solid clinical knowledge and
• to follow up the same clinical rules accepted
for other patients.
Mariano and McLeod
• Based on their experience caring for three American
presidents, Mariano and McLeod7 offered three
directives for caring for VIPs:
• Vow to value your medical skills and judgment
• Intend to command the medical aspects of the
situation
• Practice medicine the same way for all your patients.7
• In this paper, we hope to extend the sparse literature
on the VIP syndrome by proposing nine principles of
caring for VIPs, with recommendations specific to the
type of VIP where applicable.
Guzman et al offer
9 principles in handling VIPs
• “that’s where you’ve got to
• take a deep breath
• and reassess.”
Principle 1
• Don’t bend the rules.
• Any deviation of clinical practice when caring
for a VIP can compromise delivery of the right
care.
Principle 2
• Work as a team, not in “silos.”
• Teamwork is crucial in ensuring good clinical
outcomes.
Principle 3
• Communicate, communicate, communicate.
• Heightened communication should include
the patient, family, and other health staff
members involved in providing care.
Principle 4
• Carefully manage communication with the
media.
• Confidentiality in the physician-patient
relationship must be guarded.
Principle 5
• Resist “chairperson’s syndrome.”
• Chairperson’s syndrome is pressure from the
patient, family member, hospital
representative, or even the VIP patient to be
cared for by the department chairperson.
Principle 6
• Care should occur where it is most
appropriate.
• Decisions on where to place the VIP patient
should be made on the basis of the venue
where the optimal care can be delivered.
Principle 7
• Protect the patient’s security.
• Ensuring security is of paramount importance
in managing VIP syndrome.
Principle 8
• Be careful about accepting or declining gifts.
• It is suggested that physicians decline gifts
graciously to minimize unmet expectations
and misunderstandings, and also affirm the
care that is free of gifts.
Principle 9
• Work with the patient’s personal physicians.
• Effective interactions with the VIP’s personal
caregivers can facilitate communication and
decision making for the patient.
Not To Treat Our Own Family Members
• To provide the best care, a physician needs to
be detached and objective. That’s why we are
advised not to treat our own family members.
I’ve spoken to several doctors who admitted
that they too often sought and received V.I.P.
care when they became ill, particularly from
their own hospitals.
• “When you’re contemplating superhuman or
very heroic, unorthodox behavior in your zeal
to help a famous patient,” Lerner said, “that’s
where you’ve got to take a deep breath and
reassess.”

Vip or recommendoma syndrome

  • 1.
    Recommendoma Syndrome Or VIP (very important person) Syndrome Muhammad Muhammad Al Hennawy Senior Consultant Obstetrician & Gynacologist Ras El Bar Central Hospital ,Egypt mmhennawy.site44.com www.drhennawy.8m.net
  • 2.
    Definition • The presenceof numerous unexpected and unusual complications in recommended patients that the treating physician is trying to give a better assistance
  • 3.
    • VIPs aregiven • the best care, • faster and • greater access, • enhanced and more convenient facilities, and • special attention from physicians, • VIP care can be singularly harmful
  • 4.
    • Unfortunately, tryingto provide better care sets up the VIP for a higher complication rate and a greater chance of death.
  • 5.
    Recommended Or VIPPatients? • It is a person given special privileges in view of his or her status or wealth. • Examples of VIPs include • Royalty, • Politicians, • Celebrities, • Corporate leaders, • Wealthy individuals , and • Medical personnel or their relatives
  • 6.
    Names • Recommendoma Syndrome •Recommendosarcoma syndrome • Syndrome of recommended patient • VIP (very important person) syndrome
  • 7.
    History • This situationwas first documented in a paper published in the 1960s which noted that VIP patients have worse outcomes. • Then described by Dr. Walter Weintraub of the University of Maryland School of Medicine in a 1964 paper, • VIP Syndrome is shorthand for how the influence of wealth and the allure of fame can cause doctors to veer into risky territory when they cater to stars.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Patients' Attitude • Starsmay reject medical advice • Stars may demand ineffective treatments. • Star-struck doctors may order unnecessary tests or not enough. • Chairperson’s syndrome is pressure from the patient, family member, hospital representative, or even the VIP patient to be cared for by the department chairperson.
  • 10.
    • A VIPmay insist on the senior-most specialist at an academic institution or teaching hospital—the chair of the department of medicine, or of surgery, for instance. But the senior-most, or most eminent, caregiver is not necessarily the most skilled at performing a given procedure. Such an individual may be out of practice, or no longer up-to-date, and the "no name" subordinate may actually be much more skilled.
  • 11.
    Inefficient Use OfHealth Resources • Medical professionals can be vulnerable to clouded judgment, and thus cause harm to their patients • When physicians suffer a loss of judgment in the face of the glamour and prestige of a famous client • (Doctors Didn’t Follow Standard Practices because the Patient was a VIP”) • Absence of an adequate register of clinical data and • Change in usual clinical practice on interpretation of diagnostic tests as well as • In the indication of treatment of these patients
  • 12.
    • Every testhas its own set of possible complications. Each consultant feels compelled to add something to the evaluation, which usually means even more tests, and more possible complications. And once too many consultants are involved, there is no “captain of the ship” and care can become fragmented and even more inefficient and dangerous.
  • 13.
    • VIPs maybe prescribed narcotics or other controlled substances when an ordinary patient would be denied them, or they may be over-medicated with larger amounts of such drugs than appropriate. • VIP medicine can be extravagant and wasteful. Excessive drug prescriptions may be written and imaging studies ordered
  • 14.
    • Using hisor her status to influence a given professional or institution to make unorthodox decisions under the pressure or presence of said VIP—that relates to the accessibility and quality of health care
  • 15.
    • When treatinga V.I.P., doctors may avoid giving bad news. In hopes of sparing their special patient from pain or time-consuming care, a doctor may opt to skip basic tests or procedures — even though these exams may have provided important information. The flip side is that V.I.P. treatment may result in extra and unnecessary tests
  • 16.
    • Prominent orfamous people who fall ill have obvious reasons for desiring instant and ample medical care. Additionally, they have a desire to avoid public scrutiny in matters of private medical care, as all patients do, and may demand special accommodations on this basis. They may want to avoid the prying eyes of journalists as well as those of the curious onlookers among the hospital staff who may not be directly involved in their care. Their desire for privacy is an understandable aspect of their need for extra security. Often the pressure on medical staff for special accommodations comes from a VIP's entourage rather than from the patient.
  • 17.
    • Hospital administratorsmay meddle in decisions if the patient is a potential financial donor.
  • 18.
    • Some observersobject that, although it is not surprising that those with fame or wealth receive more attention when sick, it seems unfair that they should get "better" medical care than others, especially in cases where scarce resources, including time, are reallocated to accommodate them.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    • when formerPresident Gerald Ford was discharged from the hospital with the diagnosis of an inner-ear infection when, in fact, he had suffered a stroke
  • 21.
    • Prince diedof an opioid addiction that may have been facilitated by physicians prescribing too powerful a drug under circumstances in which they were not licensed or registered to prescribe them.
  • 22.
    • Jackson's personaldoctor, Conrad Murray, spent two years in prison after his involuntary manslaughter conviction in the King of Pop's 2009 death. Jackson had requested a surgical anesthetic, propofol, to help him sleep, calling it his "milk," according to trial testimony. Prosecutors said Murray supplied the drug and didn't notice when Jackson stopped breathing.
  • 23.
    • Another doctortook a cellphone photo of Joan Rivers on the operating table, according to a recently settled malpractice lawsuit. That's a clear sign of clouded judgment, Dinwiddie said.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    • The bestway to prevent this "syndrome of recommended patient" is to • maintain, even within these patients, an attitude based on solid clinical knowledge and • to follow up the same clinical rules accepted for other patients.
  • 26.
    Mariano and McLeod •Based on their experience caring for three American presidents, Mariano and McLeod7 offered three directives for caring for VIPs: • Vow to value your medical skills and judgment • Intend to command the medical aspects of the situation • Practice medicine the same way for all your patients.7 • In this paper, we hope to extend the sparse literature on the VIP syndrome by proposing nine principles of caring for VIPs, with recommendations specific to the type of VIP where applicable.
  • 27.
    Guzman et aloffer 9 principles in handling VIPs
  • 28.
    • “that’s whereyou’ve got to • take a deep breath • and reassess.”
  • 29.
    Principle 1 • Don’tbend the rules. • Any deviation of clinical practice when caring for a VIP can compromise delivery of the right care.
  • 30.
    Principle 2 • Workas a team, not in “silos.” • Teamwork is crucial in ensuring good clinical outcomes.
  • 31.
    Principle 3 • Communicate,communicate, communicate. • Heightened communication should include the patient, family, and other health staff members involved in providing care.
  • 32.
    Principle 4 • Carefullymanage communication with the media. • Confidentiality in the physician-patient relationship must be guarded.
  • 33.
    Principle 5 • Resist“chairperson’s syndrome.” • Chairperson’s syndrome is pressure from the patient, family member, hospital representative, or even the VIP patient to be cared for by the department chairperson.
  • 34.
    Principle 6 • Careshould occur where it is most appropriate. • Decisions on where to place the VIP patient should be made on the basis of the venue where the optimal care can be delivered.
  • 35.
    Principle 7 • Protectthe patient’s security. • Ensuring security is of paramount importance in managing VIP syndrome.
  • 36.
    Principle 8 • Becareful about accepting or declining gifts. • It is suggested that physicians decline gifts graciously to minimize unmet expectations and misunderstandings, and also affirm the care that is free of gifts.
  • 37.
    Principle 9 • Workwith the patient’s personal physicians. • Effective interactions with the VIP’s personal caregivers can facilitate communication and decision making for the patient.
  • 38.
    Not To TreatOur Own Family Members • To provide the best care, a physician needs to be detached and objective. That’s why we are advised not to treat our own family members. I’ve spoken to several doctors who admitted that they too often sought and received V.I.P. care when they became ill, particularly from their own hospitals.
  • 39.
    • “When you’recontemplating superhuman or very heroic, unorthodox behavior in your zeal to help a famous patient,” Lerner said, “that’s where you’ve got to take a deep breath and reassess.”