F1. Please indicate the percentage of currently active programs in which your
organization starts planning the evaluation process at each of the stages listed
below. Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage.
0%
1-19 20-39 40-59 60-79
Prior to program development 1
As the first step in program 1
development
During program development
1
After program completion
1
When training program results must
be documented
Evaluations are not implemented

80-100%
2
3
2
3

4
4

5
5

6
6

2
2
1

3
3
2

4
4
3

5
5
4

6
6
5

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

F2. Employee development programs are delivered for a variety of reasons and
have different levels of participation. Please indicate to the right the
percentage of your currently active programs that match the descriptions listed.
Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. Respond to
all reasons that apply.
0%
1-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
Employees are sent to the program 1
2
as a reward
All employees involved in an 1
2
3
activity or specific group attend the
program
Participants will acquire new 1
2
3
attitudes by attending the program
Participants in the program will be 1
2
able to perform at a set level
A change in organizational
1
2
3
outcomes will result from the
program

3

4

5

4

5

6

4

5

6

3

4

5

4

5

6

6

6

F3. Approximately what percentage of the employee training staff is involved in
evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate
percentage.
0%
1

1-19
2

20-39 40-59 60-79
3
4
5

80-100%
6

F4. Approximately what percentage of employee training budget is applied to the
evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate
percentage.
0%
1

1-19
2

20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
3
4
5
6

F5. Approximately what percentage of the employee training staff has formal
preparation in evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the
appropriate percentage.
0%
1

1-19
2

20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
3
4
5
6

F6. What percentage of the time do you isolate the effects of a training program
using the following methods? Please circle the number corresponding to the
appropriate percentage.
0%
1-19 20-39
Use of control groups
Trend line analysis
Forecasting methods
Participant estimate

40-59
1
1
1
1

60-79
2
2
2
2

80-100%
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4

5
5
5
5

6
6
6
6
Supervisor estimate
1
2
3
Management estimates
1
2
3
Use of previous studies 1
2
3
Customer/client input
1
2
3
Expert estimates 1
2
3
4
Subordinate estimates
1
2
3
Calculating/estimating the impact of
other factors

4
4
4
4
5
4
1

5
5
5
5
6
5
2

6
6
6
6
6
3

4

5

6

Other methods used to isolate the effects of the program:
0%
1
1

1-19
2
2

20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
3
4
5
6
3
4
5
6

Comments:

F7. Circle the percentage of currently active training programs that must be
evaluated in order to receive continued funding.
0%
1

1-19
2

20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
3
4
5
6

F8. Financial expertise is available to support training evaluation if requested
from sources within the organization
(example: assistance with acquisition of outcome data such
as turnover, unit costs, etc.)
Yes

No

If yes, do you routinely use this financial expertise to
support training evaluation?
Yes
No
F9. How is employee development funded in your organization?
Separate training budget
Administrative budget and no chargeback for program attendance

Check only one.

Separate training budget and separate profit center
Administrative budget and some form of
chargeback for program attendance
Other:

F10. Is a written training evaluation policy in place in your
organization?
Yes
No
If “No“, skip to question F13.
F11. To what extent does your written evaluation policy guide the evaluation
process?
Please circle the number corresponding to the percent of use.
0%
1

1-19
2

20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100%
3
4
5
6

F12. Which levels of evaluation are covered by the written policy? Check all
that apply.
Level 1 (reaction)
Level 4 (organizational outcomes)
Level 2 (learning)
Level 5 (ROI)
Learning 3 (on-the-job application)

Other:

F13. Which criteria are important in selecting training programs for evaluation
at the return-on-investment level (Level 5)? Rank the following ten items
(including your specified “other“ item) in order of importance: 1 is most
important;
10 is least important. Please designate a ranking score only one time (e.g. only
one item should be ranked a 1, 2, 3, etc.).
Involves large target audience
Take a significant investment of time
Expected to have a long life cycle
visibility

Have high

Important to strategic objectives
Have a comprehensive needs assessment
Links to operational goals and issues
interest of top executives

Have the

Are expensive
Other:
F14. Which criteria would be most important in determining the most effective
method of calculating return on investment (ROI) of training? Rank the following
ten items (including your specified “other“ item) in order of importance. 1 is
most important;
10 is least important. Please designate a ranking score only one time (e.g.
only one item should be ranked a 1, 2, 3, etc.)
simple
economical
credible
theoretically sound
account for other factors
(e.g., isolate variables other than training)
be appropriate for a variety of programs
be applicable with all types of data
account for all program costs
have successful track record
Other:
F15. Training program evaluation information is routinely
reported to executive management in my organization.

No

Yes

More Related Content

PDF
Demonstrating Business Value with Data Science
DOC
Thinkpiecegovtpower
PPT
Training
PPT
Nails for Christ: Puerto Penasco Home Builds
PPT
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
PPTX
Traininganddevelopmentattesco 130415024821-phpapp01
PDF
Dorchester Dumble Corporate Crime Csr Issue102
DOC
Thinkpiececorpharm
Demonstrating Business Value with Data Science
Thinkpiecegovtpower
Training
Nails for Christ: Puerto Penasco Home Builds
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
Traininganddevelopmentattesco 130415024821-phpapp01
Dorchester Dumble Corporate Crime Csr Issue102
Thinkpiececorpharm

Viewers also liked (12)

PPS
Fantastic Trip (1)
DOC
Trainingdevelopmentdhanu 120823041856-phpapp01
PPT
Do you really want to be the boss?
PPT
Innovative Collaborative Group Work
DOC
10 tips to overcome
PPT
Teaching Awardees Slideshow
PPT
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
PDF
24909960 service-quality-model
PPT
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
DOC
Training and development questionnaire (1)
PPT
Urinary Tract Disorders
DOCX
15596592 final-thesis-on-training-and-development
Fantastic Trip (1)
Trainingdevelopmentdhanu 120823041856-phpapp01
Do you really want to be the boss?
Innovative Collaborative Group Work
10 tips to overcome
Teaching Awardees Slideshow
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
24909960 service-quality-model
Wiki-based Gene Reports in Medical Genetics 421
Training and development questionnaire (1)
Urinary Tract Disorders
15596592 final-thesis-on-training-and-development
Ad

Similar to Vvvvv (20)

PPT
Measuring ROI of Training
PPT
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
PPT
Measuring RETURN ON INVESTMENT of Training.ppt
PPTX
Cracking The Business Case For Learning Code
PDF
The Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation Model
PPT
Unique file 8
PPTX
Bite the bullet
PDF
Sales White Paper: Evaluating Sales Training Programs
DOCX
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
PPTX
2009 Roi Trainer 1 Rev1
PDF
Assignment & presentation for prin.marketing
PPT
ROI on Learning and Development _long_dec_6_2007
DOCX
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
DOCX
Chick-fil-A Training Program DevelopmentRunning head .docx
PPT
PPT on implementing Kirkpatrickk Model
PDF
Measuring learning impact & effectiveness
DOC
Performance pionts program Template by Florence Vorster 2016
PPTX
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
PPT
Evaluation of training
Measuring ROI of Training
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring RETURN ON INVESTMENT of Training.ppt
Cracking The Business Case For Learning Code
The Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation Model
Unique file 8
Bite the bullet
Sales White Paper: Evaluating Sales Training Programs
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
2009 Roi Trainer 1 Rev1
Assignment & presentation for prin.marketing
ROI on Learning and Development _long_dec_6_2007
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Chick-fil-A Training Program DevelopmentRunning head .docx
PPT on implementing Kirkpatrickk Model
Measuring learning impact & effectiveness
Performance pionts program Template by Florence Vorster 2016
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
Evaluation of training
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
CEH Module 2 Footprinting CEH V13, concepts
PPTX
Build automations faster and more reliably with UiPath ScreenPlay
PDF
A symptom-driven medical diagnosis support model based on machine learning te...
PDF
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PPTX
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
PDF
Electrocardiogram sequences data analytics and classification using unsupervi...
PDF
Transform-Your-Factory-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PDF
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
PDF
The-Future-of-Automotive-Quality-is-Here-AI-Driven-Engineering.pdf
PDF
Rapid Prototyping: A lecture on prototyping techniques for interface design
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
PDF
Dell Pro Micro: Speed customer interactions, patient processing, and learning...
PDF
Transform-Your-Supply-Chain-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
PDF
substrate PowerPoint Presentation basic one
PDF
Decision Optimization - From Theory to Practice
PDF
Auditboard EB SOX Playbook 2023 edition.
PDF
Human Computer Interaction Miterm Lesson
PDF
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
PPTX
Presentation - Principles of Instructional Design.pptx
PDF
AI.gov: A Trojan Horse in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
CEH Module 2 Footprinting CEH V13, concepts
Build automations faster and more reliably with UiPath ScreenPlay
A symptom-driven medical diagnosis support model based on machine learning te...
5-Ways-AI-is-Revolutionizing-Telecom-Quality-Engineering.pdf
SGT Report The Beast Plan and Cyberphysical Systems of Control
Electrocardiogram sequences data analytics and classification using unsupervi...
Transform-Your-Factory-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
Co-training pseudo-labeling for text classification with support vector machi...
The-Future-of-Automotive-Quality-is-Here-AI-Driven-Engineering.pdf
Rapid Prototyping: A lecture on prototyping techniques for interface design
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week IV
Dell Pro Micro: Speed customer interactions, patient processing, and learning...
Transform-Your-Supply-Chain-with-AI-Driven-Quality-Engineering.pdf
substrate PowerPoint Presentation basic one
Decision Optimization - From Theory to Practice
Auditboard EB SOX Playbook 2023 edition.
Human Computer Interaction Miterm Lesson
SaaS reusability assessment using machine learning techniques
Presentation - Principles of Instructional Design.pptx
AI.gov: A Trojan Horse in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Vvvvv

  • 1. F1. Please indicate the percentage of currently active programs in which your organization starts planning the evaluation process at each of the stages listed below. Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. 0% 1-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 Prior to program development 1 As the first step in program 1 development During program development 1 After program completion 1 When training program results must be documented Evaluations are not implemented 80-100% 2 3 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 2 2 1 3 3 2 4 4 3 5 5 4 6 6 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 F2. Employee development programs are delivered for a variety of reasons and have different levels of participation. Please indicate to the right the percentage of your currently active programs that match the descriptions listed. Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. Respond to all reasons that apply. 0% 1-19 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% Employees are sent to the program 1 2 as a reward All employees involved in an 1 2 3 activity or specific group attend the program Participants will acquire new 1 2 3 attitudes by attending the program Participants in the program will be 1 2 able to perform at a set level A change in organizational 1 2 3 outcomes will result from the program 3 4 5 4 5 6 4 5 6 3 4 5 4 5 6 6 6 F3. Approximately what percentage of the employee training staff is involved in evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. 0% 1 1-19 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 3 4 5 80-100% 6 F4. Approximately what percentage of employee training budget is applied to the evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. 0% 1 1-19 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% 3 4 5 6 F5. Approximately what percentage of the employee training staff has formal preparation in evaluation? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. 0% 1 1-19 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% 3 4 5 6 F6. What percentage of the time do you isolate the effects of a training program using the following methods? Please circle the number corresponding to the appropriate percentage. 0% 1-19 20-39 Use of control groups Trend line analysis Forecasting methods Participant estimate 40-59 1 1 1 1 60-79 2 2 2 2 80-100% 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6
  • 2. Supervisor estimate 1 2 3 Management estimates 1 2 3 Use of previous studies 1 2 3 Customer/client input 1 2 3 Expert estimates 1 2 3 4 Subordinate estimates 1 2 3 Calculating/estimating the impact of other factors 4 4 4 4 5 4 1 5 5 5 5 6 5 2 6 6 6 6 6 3 4 5 6 Other methods used to isolate the effects of the program: 0% 1 1 1-19 2 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 Comments: F7. Circle the percentage of currently active training programs that must be evaluated in order to receive continued funding. 0% 1 1-19 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% 3 4 5 6 F8. Financial expertise is available to support training evaluation if requested from sources within the organization (example: assistance with acquisition of outcome data such as turnover, unit costs, etc.) Yes No If yes, do you routinely use this financial expertise to support training evaluation? Yes No F9. How is employee development funded in your organization? Separate training budget Administrative budget and no chargeback for program attendance Check only one. Separate training budget and separate profit center Administrative budget and some form of chargeback for program attendance Other: F10. Is a written training evaluation policy in place in your organization?
  • 3. Yes No If “No“, skip to question F13. F11. To what extent does your written evaluation policy guide the evaluation process? Please circle the number corresponding to the percent of use. 0% 1 1-19 2 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100% 3 4 5 6 F12. Which levels of evaluation are covered by the written policy? Check all that apply. Level 1 (reaction) Level 4 (organizational outcomes) Level 2 (learning) Level 5 (ROI) Learning 3 (on-the-job application) Other: F13. Which criteria are important in selecting training programs for evaluation at the return-on-investment level (Level 5)? Rank the following ten items (including your specified “other“ item) in order of importance: 1 is most important; 10 is least important. Please designate a ranking score only one time (e.g. only one item should be ranked a 1, 2, 3, etc.). Involves large target audience Take a significant investment of time Expected to have a long life cycle visibility Have high Important to strategic objectives Have a comprehensive needs assessment Links to operational goals and issues interest of top executives Have the Are expensive Other: F14. Which criteria would be most important in determining the most effective method of calculating return on investment (ROI) of training? Rank the following ten items (including your specified “other“ item) in order of importance. 1 is most important; 10 is least important. Please designate a ranking score only one time (e.g. only one item should be ranked a 1, 2, 3, etc.) simple economical credible theoretically sound account for other factors
  • 4. (e.g., isolate variables other than training) be appropriate for a variety of programs be applicable with all types of data account for all program costs have successful track record Other: F15. Training program evaluation information is routinely reported to executive management in my organization. No Yes