The DotCom Bubble in
      California


    s1160140 Kiyoto Tanji
Contents
●   Dot-com bubble
●   Bubble growth
●   Soaring stock
●   Free spending
●   The bubble bursts
●   Reference
Dot-com Bubble
●   The Dot-com bubble was a speculative bubble
    covering roughly 1995-2000 duaring which
    stock markets in industrialized nations saw their
    equity value rise rapidly from growth in the more
    recent Internet sector and related fields.
What was the Dot-com bubble
●   The dot-com bubble was a stock market bubble
    which popped to near-devastating effect in
    2001. It was powered by the rise of Internet
    sites and the tech industry in general, and many
    of these companies went under or learned
    some valuable lessons when the bubble finally
    burst. Many investors lost substantial sums of
    money on the dot-com bubble, helping to trigger
    a mild economic recession in the early 2000s.
Bubble Growth
●   Venture capitalists saw record-setting growth as
    dot-com companies experienced meteoric rises
    in their stock prices and therefore moved faster
    and with less caution than usual, choosing to
    mitigate the risk by starting many contenders
    and letting the market decide which would
    succeed.
●   This combined with a period of relative wealth,
    with many 'ordinary' people with spare cash
    investing and day-trading, which caused a lot of
    many to chase the available investment
    opportunities.
Soaring stock
●   The term may be used with certainty only in
    retrospect when share prices have since
    crashed.
●   A bubble occurs when speculators note the fast
    increase in value and decide to buy in
    anticipation of further rises, rather than because
    the shares are undervalued.
●   Typically many companies thus become grossly
    overvalued. When the bubble "bursts," the
    share prices fall dramatically, and many
    companies go out of business.
Free spending
●   According to dot-com theory, an Internet
    company's survival depended on expanding its
    customer base as rapidly as possible, even if it
    produced large annual losses.
●   For instance
      Amazon was spending on expanding customer
      base and alerting people to its existence
      Google was busy spending on creating more
      powerful machine capacity to serve its expanding
      search engine.
The Bubble bursts
●   The bursting of the bubble may also have been
    related to the poor results of Internet retailers
    following the 1999 Christmas season.
●   This was the first unequivocal and public
    evidence that the 'get-rich-quick' Internet
    strategy was flawed for most companies.
●   These retailers result were made public in
    March when annual and quarterly reports of
    public firms were released.
Fall In
●   A lot of venture companies related.
●   Google and Amazon carry through
●   September 11, 2001, United States rushed into
    a serious recession.
Worldwide Influence
●   Ireland achieved this economic growth that was
    called “Miracle of Keruto”.
●   Chinese IT has not developed, so it wasn't
    damaged hard.
Japanese Influence
●   Japan rise hanging cause of United States of
    Bubble.
●   However the bubble is not so long.
●   The influence of burst of economic bubble on
    Japan was extremely limited.
Aftermath
●   More in-depth analysis shows that 50% of the
    dot-coms companies survived through 2004.
●   It is safe to assume that the assets lost from the
    Stock Market do not directly link to the closing
    of firms.
●   More importantly, however, it can be concluded
    that even companies who were categorized as
    the "small players" were adequate enough to
    endure the destruction of the financial market
    during 2000-2002.
References
●   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-
    com_bubble#Bubble_growth
●   http://www.wisegeek.com/what-was-the-dot-
    com-bubble.htm
●   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cons
    titution_and_worldwide_influence

Week12 slide

  • 1.
    The DotCom Bubblein California s1160140 Kiyoto Tanji
  • 2.
    Contents ● Dot-com bubble ● Bubble growth ● Soaring stock ● Free spending ● The bubble bursts ● Reference
  • 3.
    Dot-com Bubble ● The Dot-com bubble was a speculative bubble covering roughly 1995-2000 duaring which stock markets in industrialized nations saw their equity value rise rapidly from growth in the more recent Internet sector and related fields.
  • 4.
    What was theDot-com bubble ● The dot-com bubble was a stock market bubble which popped to near-devastating effect in 2001. It was powered by the rise of Internet sites and the tech industry in general, and many of these companies went under or learned some valuable lessons when the bubble finally burst. Many investors lost substantial sums of money on the dot-com bubble, helping to trigger a mild economic recession in the early 2000s.
  • 5.
    Bubble Growth ● Venture capitalists saw record-setting growth as dot-com companies experienced meteoric rises in their stock prices and therefore moved faster and with less caution than usual, choosing to mitigate the risk by starting many contenders and letting the market decide which would succeed. ● This combined with a period of relative wealth, with many 'ordinary' people with spare cash investing and day-trading, which caused a lot of many to chase the available investment opportunities.
  • 6.
    Soaring stock ● The term may be used with certainty only in retrospect when share prices have since crashed. ● A bubble occurs when speculators note the fast increase in value and decide to buy in anticipation of further rises, rather than because the shares are undervalued. ● Typically many companies thus become grossly overvalued. When the bubble "bursts," the share prices fall dramatically, and many companies go out of business.
  • 7.
    Free spending ● According to dot-com theory, an Internet company's survival depended on expanding its customer base as rapidly as possible, even if it produced large annual losses. ● For instance Amazon was spending on expanding customer base and alerting people to its existence Google was busy spending on creating more powerful machine capacity to serve its expanding search engine.
  • 8.
    The Bubble bursts ● The bursting of the bubble may also have been related to the poor results of Internet retailers following the 1999 Christmas season. ● This was the first unequivocal and public evidence that the 'get-rich-quick' Internet strategy was flawed for most companies. ● These retailers result were made public in March when annual and quarterly reports of public firms were released.
  • 9.
    Fall In ● A lot of venture companies related. ● Google and Amazon carry through ● September 11, 2001, United States rushed into a serious recession.
  • 10.
    Worldwide Influence ● Ireland achieved this economic growth that was called “Miracle of Keruto”. ● Chinese IT has not developed, so it wasn't damaged hard.
  • 11.
    Japanese Influence ● Japan rise hanging cause of United States of Bubble. ● However the bubble is not so long. ● The influence of burst of economic bubble on Japan was extremely limited.
  • 12.
    Aftermath ● More in-depth analysis shows that 50% of the dot-coms companies survived through 2004. ● It is safe to assume that the assets lost from the Stock Market do not directly link to the closing of firms. ● More importantly, however, it can be concluded that even companies who were categorized as the "small players" were adequate enough to endure the destruction of the financial market during 2000-2002.
  • 13.
    References ● http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot- com_bubble#Bubble_growth ● http://www.wisegeek.com/what-was-the-dot- com-bubble.htm ● http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cons titution_and_worldwide_influence