Writing retreat: APP PGR
How to prepare your
portfolio of evidence
for the application for
Associate Fellowship.
UKPSF Descriptor 1 –
to gain Associate Fellowship, HEA
D1.1 Successful engagement with at least two of the five Areas of
Activity.
D1.II Successful engagement in appropriate teaching and practices
related to these Areas of Activity.
D1.III Appropriate Core Knowledge and understanding of at least K1
and K2.
D1.IV A commitment to appropriate Professional Values in facilitating
others’ learning.
D1.V Relevant professional practices, subject and pedagogic
research and/or scholarship within the above activities.
D1.VI Successful engagement, where appropriate, in professional
development activity related to teaching, learning, and
assessment responsibilities.
E-portfolio for APP PGR contains:
• Portfolio checklist (complete tables)
• Teaching Philosophy statement (500 words)
• UKPSF dimensions of the framework (notes in
table)
• Reflective Practice (5-20 entries)
• Teaching Observations (2 completed forms)
• Narrative of Professional Practice (1400 words; 2
Areas of Activity – can be two pieces)
• Digital badges (uploaded)
Writing retreat app pgr
Submission information
• Submit while you are still at Warwick!
• Once ready, your portfolio is submitted through
Moodle and locked for marking.
• Portfolios are assessed by one of the LDC team,
but could also be second marked by your mentor.
• Two outcomes are possible: PASS (AFHEA) or
REFER (you can amend and re-submit).
• Once you have passed, you can go on to the
Postgraduate Award in Teaching and Learning in
HE – optional.
Portfolio submission
deadlines
APP PGR 2016-17:
Monday 9th April
APP PGR 2017-18:
Monday 23rd April
Portfolio checklist
• Complete all sections
• Indicate free choice workshop titles, providing details where
there are ‘substitutions’ (even a hyperlink if applicable).
Teaching Philosophy
This should be a personal statement reflecting on your
core values, ideas and standpoints as a teacher. Look at
the UKPSF ‘core knowledge’ and ‘core values’ to inform
your statement.
Use examples but try not to simply describe activities you
do in sessions; more ‘approaches’.
Statement is around 500 words but you can
also use other evidence (images etc).
Use your ‘rich picture’ or the TP
handouts as a starting point
UKPSF dimensions
This self-assessment table allows you to consider your
position at the start and end of the course, in relation to
the UKPSF.
Not all boxes need to be filled – prioritise the ones
indicated with blue (of most relevance to AF level).
A few lines for each
section is fine.
Use the notes you
wrote in workshop 1.
Reflective Practice
Set up ‘journals’ on your e-portfolio so that your entries
are made available on the page.
Use any of the models examined in workshop 1 to help
you get started.
Avoid simply ‘describing what happened’ – try to think
critically.
Write between 5-20 reflective entries – possible topics
could include:
taught workshops you have attended; teaching sessions you have delivered;
trigger incidents’ in your teaching; assessment and feedback to students;
something you have read in a journal/the press; departmental
activities/decisions/directions; national developments in teaching in your field
Reflective Practice Models
Schon (1991) models, sourced at:
http://myreflectivepracticejuanes.weebly.com/
uploads/1/1/8/2/11827245/6867837.png?297
(Accessed 12/01/16; 19:15)
Adapted from Boud et al (1985) Reflection:
Turning Experience into Learning London, Kogan
Page
Teaching observations
You need to be observed – choose someone who will be able to give
you advice and guidance, who is willing to complete the form and
talk to you about their recommendations. Choose someone in the
same/similar discipline, if possible.
Prioritise aspects of your teaching you want to develop or would like
feedback on.
You need to observe an experienced teacher – choose someone
who you think you will learn from but who could come from any
subject specialism.
Prioritise part 3 of the form (5 themes); complete the others if your
colleague is willing.
Look at the guidelines in the handbook appendix, including critical
questions you can ask about teaching.
Upload the two documents to your e-portfolio
Narrative of Professional Practice
Choose two of the five Areas of Activity (many postgrads
who teach will have evidence in A1, A2 and A3).
Divide the text equally between each Area of Activity:
you can have one continuous piece or two short pieces.
This writing needs to contain a balance of description
and examples, analysis and critique and reference to
wider reading from pedagogic and subject specialist
literature.
You can attach additional supporting evidence (e.g.
feedback from students) in this section but it is the core
text which will be assessed.
Make reference to other UKPSF dimensions throughout
the piece.
In November, students were provided with the coursework specification. Closer to
Christmas, the emails started arriving from students, and I generally responded on the
same day (V1). Students have praised my fast responses (see appendix A). Recognising
the importance of fast feedback, as well as taking pride in our speed, after submission
the two tutors returned their marks within a week. This led to a faster feedback
turnaround, and gave students longer to take this feedback and use it to prepare for
their examination (K3). Yorke and Longden (2006) [9] detail how a survey of 6000
students felt that feedback was not sufficiently prompt to be constructive, and
therefore by increasing the speed of feedback, both student satisfaction and exam
results may rise (V3). Upon further discussion with some students, it was found that
some were relying on feedback for this coursework in order to implement similar
functionality in their final year dissertation projects. This idea is also presented by
Brown and Knight (1994) [2] who write that feedback should be given whilst it is still
relevant, in order to allow the students to grow elsewhere. I agree with this as I feel
that feedback would be useless if returned too long after the deadlines; Students
would have moved on to other topics and coursework, and have neither the time nor
motivation to take the feedback on board (V1, K3), a problem mentioned by Gibbs and
Habeshaw (1989) [5]. This has been portrayed in other modules, where feedback was
provided around the time of other deadlines, and students told me that they were
unable to really analyse the feedback due to time constraints.
Balance description, analysis
and theory
Coherent markers in writing
In November, students were provided with the coursework specification. Closer to Christmas, the
emails started arriving from students, and I generally responded on the same day. Students have
praised my fast responses (see appendix A). Recognising the importance of fast feedback, as well
as taking pride in our speed, after submission the two tutors returned their marks within a week.
This led to a faster feedback turnaround, and gave students longer to take this feedback and use it
to prepare for their examination. Yorke and Longden (2006) [9] detail how a survey of 6000
students felt that feedback was not sufficiently prompt to be constructive, and therefore by
increasing the speed of feedback, both student satisfaction and exam results may rise. Upon
further discussion with some students, it was found that some were relying on feedback for this
coursework in order to implement similar functionality in their final year dissertation projects. This
idea is also presented by Brown and Knight (1994) [2] who write that feedback should be given
whilst it is still relevant, in order to allow the students to grow elsewhere. I agree with this as I feel
that feedback would be useless if returned too long after the deadlines; Students would have
moved on to other topics and coursework, and have neither the time nor motivation to take the
feedback on board, a problem mentioned by Gibbs and Habeshaw (1989) [5]. This has been
portrayed in other modules, where feedback was provided around the time of other deadlines,
and students told me that they were unable to really analyse the feedback due to time constraints.
Evidencing Area of Activity 1:
Design and plan learning activities and/or
programmes of study
You may wish to reflect on:
1. The main ways in which you design and plan learning activities and/or
programmes of study;
2. The reasons for your choice of:
a. subject material;
b. activities and techniques;
c. the particular learning technologies included in your plan.
3. How you make choices to facilitate learning in general and within your
learners’ subject area;
4. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework, for example:
• relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why;
• relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
Examples you could include
Curriculum design
Different ways in which you can conceive of the
notion of ‘curriculum’
Curriculum as ‘knowledge’
Curriculum as ‘product’
Curriculum as ‘process’
Curriculum as ‘praxis’
Curriculum which is ‘hidden’
Curriculum Theory and Practice (Infed): http://infed.org/mobi/curriculum-theory-
and-practice/ (Accessed on 12/01/16; 20:40)
Taking student skills higher
https://expertbeacon.com/sites/default/files/Blooms%20Taxonomy.jpg (Accessed on 30/11/15: 20:30)
Curriculum example
Evidencing Area of Activity 2:
Teach and/or support learning
You may wish to reflect on:
1. The main ways in which you teach and/or support learners;
2. The activities or techniques you use and why;
3. How you came to use them and why you think they were successful
in supporting student learning. Give reasons for your choice of
activities and techniques and how they relate to developing the
learners’ understanding of the subject/discipline;
4. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework such as:
• relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why;
• relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
Examples you could include
Broad theoretical approaches to
teaching and learning
Behaviourist (Watson, Skinner)
Cognitivist/Constructivist/Active
(Vygotsky, Dewey, Petty)
Humanist (Knowles, Maslow, Rogers)
Social/Ecological (Vygotsky, Bandura)
For a helpful summary/starting point, go to:
http://www.lifecircles-inc.com/Learningtheories/learningmap.html
Evidencing Area of Activity 3:
Assess and give feedback to learners
You may wish to reflect on:
1. The main types of formative and/or summative assessment that you use
with learners, whether formal or informal;
2. How and why you choose the particular approaches and methods you
employ, in so far as this was your own decision;
3. How you ensure your assessments are valid indicators of what you want
your learners to learn, that your marking is reliable and the standards you set
are appropriate;
4. How you give feedback to learners and ensure it supports and improves
their understanding of the subject, their performance and/or their
development as learners;
5. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework for example:
• relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why;
• relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
Examples you could include
Look at the following…
Bloxham and Boyd (2007; 2012) – general guidance on the development of
assessment techniques in HE
https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/9780335221073.pdf
QAA – relationship between formative and summative assessment in HE
http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/enhancement-
themes/completed-enhancement-themes/integrative-assessment
HEA Assessment Review Tool – to help you to reflect on your assessment
processes https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/marked-improvement-
transforming-assessment-higher-education-assessment-review-tool
Reinventing Education (Dr Will Curtis, Warwick CLL)
https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/will_curtis_final.pdf
Assessment and/or feedback
examples
Incorporating theory
Broad theories about learning and
teaching (e.g. Vygotsky, Knowles)
HE teaching texts (e.g. Gibbs, Race)
Practice-based knowledge (e.g. O’Toole)
Reflective practice (e.g. Schon, Brookfield)
Subject-disciplinary pedagogy
Other sources (e.g. blogs, THE)

More Related Content

DOCX
English 1 course outline
PDF
Eed 465 all weeks discussion and assignments – entire course
PPTX
Using the ACSF
DOCX
Eng 1 course outline
PPT
Curriculum for Excellence and school libraries: the Edinburgh experience
PPTX
Finding the lln skills in a unit of competence
PPT
Plan & Design 1 & 2
PDF
Lesson Plan - Report Writing
English 1 course outline
Eed 465 all weeks discussion and assignments – entire course
Using the ACSF
Eng 1 course outline
Curriculum for Excellence and school libraries: the Edinburgh experience
Finding the lln skills in a unit of competence
Plan & Design 1 & 2
Lesson Plan - Report Writing

What's hot (11)

PPTX
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
DOCX
Lesson plan writing
PDF
4199 Syllabus 5
PDF
Communicating Scientific Information Syllabus
DOC
Eng2 course outline
DOC
Edu 311 edu311 edu 311 best tutorials guide uopstudy.com
PDF
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
PDF
ELG 30505 Module Outline
PDF
EdTPA Online Module 2. Orientation to the Handbook and Rubrics
PDF
S.s. midterm capstone cover sheet spring 2017
DOCX
English 1 Module Outline
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
Lesson plan writing
4199 Syllabus 5
Communicating Scientific Information Syllabus
Eng2 course outline
Edu 311 edu311 edu 311 best tutorials guide uopstudy.com
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
ELG 30505 Module Outline
EdTPA Online Module 2. Orientation to the Handbook and Rubrics
S.s. midterm capstone cover sheet spring 2017
English 1 Module Outline
Ad

Similar to Writing retreat app pgr (20)

PPT
Pgcap session 5 module 1 session ppt nov 2017 (1)
PPTX
Mary Fitzpatrick UL_Edin Dec 1st_Tools for reflection and self development 1
PPT
LTHE Assessment and Feedback using PBL
PPTX
PG Cert Final Course Meeting
PDF
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
PPT
Assessment for Learning I
PPTX
Preparing for a professional recognition portfolio
PPTX
Postgraduates who teach
PDF
CoreSep11: assessment_and_feedback
PPTX
Portsmouth BAM Knowledge and Learning SIG
PPTX
Reflective writing for HEA fellowship for librarians
PPTX
App pgr workshop1
PPTX
APP PGR workshop 1 2017-18
DOC
Documenting Teaching Effectiveness
PPT
Stuart cannell, hea workshop 19th april
PPT
Curriculum Design - Economics workshop
PPTX
Improving student learning through programme assessment
PPT
Assessment in he 2014 webinar 5
PPTX
App pgr workshop3
PPTX
TESTA, Sports Away Day Sheffield Hallam (June 2014)
Pgcap session 5 module 1 session ppt nov 2017 (1)
Mary Fitzpatrick UL_Edin Dec 1st_Tools for reflection and self development 1
LTHE Assessment and Feedback using PBL
PG Cert Final Course Meeting
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
Assessment for Learning I
Preparing for a professional recognition portfolio
Postgraduates who teach
CoreSep11: assessment_and_feedback
Portsmouth BAM Knowledge and Learning SIG
Reflective writing for HEA fellowship for librarians
App pgr workshop1
APP PGR workshop 1 2017-18
Documenting Teaching Effectiveness
Stuart cannell, hea workshop 19th april
Curriculum Design - Economics workshop
Improving student learning through programme assessment
Assessment in he 2014 webinar 5
App pgr workshop3
TESTA, Sports Away Day Sheffield Hallam (June 2014)
Ad

More from sarahattersley (20)

PPTX
T pi he workshop 4
PPTX
T pi he workshop 3
PPTX
T pi he workshop 2
PPTX
T pi he workshop 1
PPTX
App pgr workshop4 all
PPTX
App pgr workshop2 2017-18
PPTX
PGDEtechnology2
PPTX
PGDEtechnology1
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session10
PPTX
Ifp staff training day2
PPTX
Warwick IFP staff development day1
PPTX
Alt c 2016presentation-hattersley
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session9
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session7
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session5
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session4
PPTX
Transformingtechnologies session2
PPTX
Transforming Technologies
PPTX
Wmcett 2015 technologies
PPTX
Cll conference 2015
T pi he workshop 4
T pi he workshop 3
T pi he workshop 2
T pi he workshop 1
App pgr workshop4 all
App pgr workshop2 2017-18
PGDEtechnology2
PGDEtechnology1
Transformingtechnologies session10
Ifp staff training day2
Warwick IFP staff development day1
Alt c 2016presentation-hattersley
Transformingtechnologies session9
Transformingtechnologies session7
Transformingtechnologies session5
Transformingtechnologies session4
Transformingtechnologies session2
Transforming Technologies
Wmcett 2015 technologies
Cll conference 2015

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Math 2 Quarter 2 Week 1 Matatag Curriculum
PPT
hsl powerpoint resource goyloveh feb 07.ppt
PDF
anganwadi services for the b.sc nursing and GNM
PDF
FAMILY PLANNING (preventative and social medicine pdf)
PDF
Chevening Scholarship Application and Interview Preparation Guide
PDF
IS1343_2012...........................pdf
PPTX
Theoretical for class.pptxgshdhddhdhdhgd
PPTX
PAIN PATHWAY & MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PAIN SPEAKER: Dr. Rajasekhar ...
PDF
English 2nd semesteNotesh biology biopsy results from the other day and I jus...
PDF
Diabetes Mellitus , types , clinical picture, investigation and managment
PDF
GIÁO ÁN TIẾNG ANH 7 GLOBAL SUCCESS (CẢ NĂM) THEO CÔNG VĂN 5512 (2 CỘT) NĂM HỌ...
PDF
Laparoscopic Imaging Systems at World Laparoscopy Hospital
DOCX
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENT SEMESTER MAY 2025.docx
PPTX
ENGlishGrade8_Quarter2_WEEK1_LESSON1.pptx
PDF
Kalaari-SaaS-Founder-Playbook-2024-Edition-.pdf
PDF
WHAT NURSES SAY_ COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMP.pdf
PDF
FYJC - Chemistry textbook - standard 11.
PPTX
Copy of ARAL Program Primer_071725(1).pptx
PPTX
pharmaceutics-1unit-1-221214121936-550b56aa.pptx
PPTX
Neurology of Systemic disease all systems
Math 2 Quarter 2 Week 1 Matatag Curriculum
hsl powerpoint resource goyloveh feb 07.ppt
anganwadi services for the b.sc nursing and GNM
FAMILY PLANNING (preventative and social medicine pdf)
Chevening Scholarship Application and Interview Preparation Guide
IS1343_2012...........................pdf
Theoretical for class.pptxgshdhddhdhdhgd
PAIN PATHWAY & MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PAIN SPEAKER: Dr. Rajasekhar ...
English 2nd semesteNotesh biology biopsy results from the other day and I jus...
Diabetes Mellitus , types , clinical picture, investigation and managment
GIÁO ÁN TIẾNG ANH 7 GLOBAL SUCCESS (CẢ NĂM) THEO CÔNG VĂN 5512 (2 CỘT) NĂM HỌ...
Laparoscopic Imaging Systems at World Laparoscopy Hospital
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT ASSIGNMENT SEMESTER MAY 2025.docx
ENGlishGrade8_Quarter2_WEEK1_LESSON1.pptx
Kalaari-SaaS-Founder-Playbook-2024-Edition-.pdf
WHAT NURSES SAY_ COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMP.pdf
FYJC - Chemistry textbook - standard 11.
Copy of ARAL Program Primer_071725(1).pptx
pharmaceutics-1unit-1-221214121936-550b56aa.pptx
Neurology of Systemic disease all systems

Writing retreat app pgr

  • 1. Writing retreat: APP PGR How to prepare your portfolio of evidence for the application for Associate Fellowship.
  • 2. UKPSF Descriptor 1 – to gain Associate Fellowship, HEA D1.1 Successful engagement with at least two of the five Areas of Activity. D1.II Successful engagement in appropriate teaching and practices related to these Areas of Activity. D1.III Appropriate Core Knowledge and understanding of at least K1 and K2. D1.IV A commitment to appropriate Professional Values in facilitating others’ learning. D1.V Relevant professional practices, subject and pedagogic research and/or scholarship within the above activities. D1.VI Successful engagement, where appropriate, in professional development activity related to teaching, learning, and assessment responsibilities.
  • 3. E-portfolio for APP PGR contains: • Portfolio checklist (complete tables) • Teaching Philosophy statement (500 words) • UKPSF dimensions of the framework (notes in table) • Reflective Practice (5-20 entries) • Teaching Observations (2 completed forms) • Narrative of Professional Practice (1400 words; 2 Areas of Activity – can be two pieces) • Digital badges (uploaded)
  • 5. Submission information • Submit while you are still at Warwick! • Once ready, your portfolio is submitted through Moodle and locked for marking. • Portfolios are assessed by one of the LDC team, but could also be second marked by your mentor. • Two outcomes are possible: PASS (AFHEA) or REFER (you can amend and re-submit). • Once you have passed, you can go on to the Postgraduate Award in Teaching and Learning in HE – optional.
  • 6. Portfolio submission deadlines APP PGR 2016-17: Monday 9th April APP PGR 2017-18: Monday 23rd April
  • 7. Portfolio checklist • Complete all sections • Indicate free choice workshop titles, providing details where there are ‘substitutions’ (even a hyperlink if applicable).
  • 8. Teaching Philosophy This should be a personal statement reflecting on your core values, ideas and standpoints as a teacher. Look at the UKPSF ‘core knowledge’ and ‘core values’ to inform your statement. Use examples but try not to simply describe activities you do in sessions; more ‘approaches’. Statement is around 500 words but you can also use other evidence (images etc). Use your ‘rich picture’ or the TP handouts as a starting point
  • 9. UKPSF dimensions This self-assessment table allows you to consider your position at the start and end of the course, in relation to the UKPSF. Not all boxes need to be filled – prioritise the ones indicated with blue (of most relevance to AF level). A few lines for each section is fine. Use the notes you wrote in workshop 1.
  • 10. Reflective Practice Set up ‘journals’ on your e-portfolio so that your entries are made available on the page. Use any of the models examined in workshop 1 to help you get started. Avoid simply ‘describing what happened’ – try to think critically. Write between 5-20 reflective entries – possible topics could include: taught workshops you have attended; teaching sessions you have delivered; trigger incidents’ in your teaching; assessment and feedback to students; something you have read in a journal/the press; departmental activities/decisions/directions; national developments in teaching in your field
  • 11. Reflective Practice Models Schon (1991) models, sourced at: http://myreflectivepracticejuanes.weebly.com/ uploads/1/1/8/2/11827245/6867837.png?297 (Accessed 12/01/16; 19:15) Adapted from Boud et al (1985) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning London, Kogan Page
  • 12. Teaching observations You need to be observed – choose someone who will be able to give you advice and guidance, who is willing to complete the form and talk to you about their recommendations. Choose someone in the same/similar discipline, if possible. Prioritise aspects of your teaching you want to develop or would like feedback on. You need to observe an experienced teacher – choose someone who you think you will learn from but who could come from any subject specialism. Prioritise part 3 of the form (5 themes); complete the others if your colleague is willing. Look at the guidelines in the handbook appendix, including critical questions you can ask about teaching. Upload the two documents to your e-portfolio
  • 13. Narrative of Professional Practice Choose two of the five Areas of Activity (many postgrads who teach will have evidence in A1, A2 and A3). Divide the text equally between each Area of Activity: you can have one continuous piece or two short pieces. This writing needs to contain a balance of description and examples, analysis and critique and reference to wider reading from pedagogic and subject specialist literature. You can attach additional supporting evidence (e.g. feedback from students) in this section but it is the core text which will be assessed. Make reference to other UKPSF dimensions throughout the piece.
  • 14. In November, students were provided with the coursework specification. Closer to Christmas, the emails started arriving from students, and I generally responded on the same day (V1). Students have praised my fast responses (see appendix A). Recognising the importance of fast feedback, as well as taking pride in our speed, after submission the two tutors returned their marks within a week. This led to a faster feedback turnaround, and gave students longer to take this feedback and use it to prepare for their examination (K3). Yorke and Longden (2006) [9] detail how a survey of 6000 students felt that feedback was not sufficiently prompt to be constructive, and therefore by increasing the speed of feedback, both student satisfaction and exam results may rise (V3). Upon further discussion with some students, it was found that some were relying on feedback for this coursework in order to implement similar functionality in their final year dissertation projects. This idea is also presented by Brown and Knight (1994) [2] who write that feedback should be given whilst it is still relevant, in order to allow the students to grow elsewhere. I agree with this as I feel that feedback would be useless if returned too long after the deadlines; Students would have moved on to other topics and coursework, and have neither the time nor motivation to take the feedback on board (V1, K3), a problem mentioned by Gibbs and Habeshaw (1989) [5]. This has been portrayed in other modules, where feedback was provided around the time of other deadlines, and students told me that they were unable to really analyse the feedback due to time constraints.
  • 16. Coherent markers in writing In November, students were provided with the coursework specification. Closer to Christmas, the emails started arriving from students, and I generally responded on the same day. Students have praised my fast responses (see appendix A). Recognising the importance of fast feedback, as well as taking pride in our speed, after submission the two tutors returned their marks within a week. This led to a faster feedback turnaround, and gave students longer to take this feedback and use it to prepare for their examination. Yorke and Longden (2006) [9] detail how a survey of 6000 students felt that feedback was not sufficiently prompt to be constructive, and therefore by increasing the speed of feedback, both student satisfaction and exam results may rise. Upon further discussion with some students, it was found that some were relying on feedback for this coursework in order to implement similar functionality in their final year dissertation projects. This idea is also presented by Brown and Knight (1994) [2] who write that feedback should be given whilst it is still relevant, in order to allow the students to grow elsewhere. I agree with this as I feel that feedback would be useless if returned too long after the deadlines; Students would have moved on to other topics and coursework, and have neither the time nor motivation to take the feedback on board, a problem mentioned by Gibbs and Habeshaw (1989) [5]. This has been portrayed in other modules, where feedback was provided around the time of other deadlines, and students told me that they were unable to really analyse the feedback due to time constraints.
  • 17. Evidencing Area of Activity 1: Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study You may wish to reflect on: 1. The main ways in which you design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study; 2. The reasons for your choice of: a. subject material; b. activities and techniques; c. the particular learning technologies included in your plan. 3. How you make choices to facilitate learning in general and within your learners’ subject area; 4. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework, for example: • relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why; • relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
  • 19. Curriculum design Different ways in which you can conceive of the notion of ‘curriculum’ Curriculum as ‘knowledge’ Curriculum as ‘product’ Curriculum as ‘process’ Curriculum as ‘praxis’ Curriculum which is ‘hidden’ Curriculum Theory and Practice (Infed): http://infed.org/mobi/curriculum-theory- and-practice/ (Accessed on 12/01/16; 20:40)
  • 20. Taking student skills higher https://expertbeacon.com/sites/default/files/Blooms%20Taxonomy.jpg (Accessed on 30/11/15: 20:30)
  • 22. Evidencing Area of Activity 2: Teach and/or support learning You may wish to reflect on: 1. The main ways in which you teach and/or support learners; 2. The activities or techniques you use and why; 3. How you came to use them and why you think they were successful in supporting student learning. Give reasons for your choice of activities and techniques and how they relate to developing the learners’ understanding of the subject/discipline; 4. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework such as: • relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why; • relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
  • 24. Broad theoretical approaches to teaching and learning Behaviourist (Watson, Skinner) Cognitivist/Constructivist/Active (Vygotsky, Dewey, Petty) Humanist (Knowles, Maslow, Rogers) Social/Ecological (Vygotsky, Bandura) For a helpful summary/starting point, go to: http://www.lifecircles-inc.com/Learningtheories/learningmap.html
  • 25. Evidencing Area of Activity 3: Assess and give feedback to learners You may wish to reflect on: 1. The main types of formative and/or summative assessment that you use with learners, whether formal or informal; 2. How and why you choose the particular approaches and methods you employ, in so far as this was your own decision; 3. How you ensure your assessments are valid indicators of what you want your learners to learn, that your marking is reliable and the standards you set are appropriate; 4. How you give feedback to learners and ensure it supports and improves their understanding of the subject, their performance and/or their development as learners; 5. How you incorporate other Dimensions of the Framework for example: • relevant Core Knowledge that you utilised and why; • relevant Professional Values that you utilised and why.
  • 27. Look at the following… Bloxham and Boyd (2007; 2012) – general guidance on the development of assessment techniques in HE https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/9780335221073.pdf QAA – relationship between formative and summative assessment in HE http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/enhancement- themes/completed-enhancement-themes/integrative-assessment HEA Assessment Review Tool – to help you to reflect on your assessment processes https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/marked-improvement- transforming-assessment-higher-education-assessment-review-tool Reinventing Education (Dr Will Curtis, Warwick CLL) https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/will_curtis_final.pdf
  • 29. Incorporating theory Broad theories about learning and teaching (e.g. Vygotsky, Knowles) HE teaching texts (e.g. Gibbs, Race) Practice-based knowledge (e.g. O’Toole) Reflective practice (e.g. Schon, Brookfield) Subject-disciplinary pedagogy Other sources (e.g. blogs, THE)