blob: 380a1be9550e1e5880d5367cf7a6be6164b8a1d8 [file] [log] [blame]
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001=====================================
2Filesystem-level encryption (fscrypt)
3=====================================
4
5Introduction
6============
7
8fscrypt is a library which filesystems can hook into to support
9transparent encryption of files and directories.
10
11Note: "fscrypt" in this document refers to the kernel-level portion,
12implemented in ``fs/crypto/``, as opposed to the userspace tool
13`fscrypt <https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_. This document only
14covers the kernel-level portion. For command-line examples of how to
15use encryption, see the documentation for the userspace tool `fscrypt
16<https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_. Also, it is recommended to use
17the fscrypt userspace tool, or other existing userspace tools such as
18`fscryptctl <https://github.com/google/fscryptctl>`_ or `Android's key
19management system
20<https://source.android.com/security/encryption/file-based>`_, over
21using the kernel's API directly. Using existing tools reduces the
22chance of introducing your own security bugs. (Nevertheless, for
23completeness this documentation covers the kernel's API anyway.)
24
25Unlike dm-crypt, fscrypt operates at the filesystem level rather than
26at the block device level. This allows it to encrypt different files
27with different keys and to have unencrypted files on the same
28filesystem. This is useful for multi-user systems where each user's
29data-at-rest needs to be cryptographically isolated from the others.
30However, except for filenames, fscrypt does not encrypt filesystem
31metadata.
32
33Unlike eCryptfs, which is a stacked filesystem, fscrypt is integrated
34directly into supported filesystems --- currently ext4, F2FS, and
35UBIFS. This allows encrypted files to be read and written without
36caching both the decrypted and encrypted pages in the pagecache,
37thereby nearly halving the memory used and bringing it in line with
38unencrypted files. Similarly, half as many dentries and inodes are
39needed. eCryptfs also limits encrypted filenames to 143 bytes,
40causing application compatibility issues; fscrypt allows the full 255
41bytes (NAME_MAX). Finally, unlike eCryptfs, the fscrypt API can be
42used by unprivileged users, with no need to mount anything.
43
44fscrypt does not support encrypting files in-place. Instead, it
45supports marking an empty directory as encrypted. Then, after
46userspace provides the key, all regular files, directories, and
47symbolic links created in that directory tree are transparently
48encrypted.
49
50Threat model
51============
52
53Offline attacks
54---------------
55
56Provided that userspace chooses a strong encryption key, fscrypt
57protects the confidentiality of file contents and filenames in the
58event of a single point-in-time permanent offline compromise of the
59block device content. fscrypt does not protect the confidentiality of
60non-filename metadata, e.g. file sizes, file permissions, file
61timestamps, and extended attributes. Also, the existence and location
62of holes (unallocated blocks which logically contain all zeroes) in
63files is not protected.
64
65fscrypt is not guaranteed to protect confidentiality or authenticity
66if an attacker is able to manipulate the filesystem offline prior to
67an authorized user later accessing the filesystem.
68
69Online attacks
70--------------
71
72fscrypt (and storage encryption in general) can only provide limited
73protection, if any at all, against online attacks. In detail:
74
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -070075Side-channel attacks
76~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
77
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -040078fscrypt is only resistant to side-channel attacks, such as timing or
79electromagnetic attacks, to the extent that the underlying Linux
80Cryptographic API algorithms are. If a vulnerable algorithm is used,
81such as a table-based implementation of AES, it may be possible for an
82attacker to mount a side channel attack against the online system.
83Side channel attacks may also be mounted against applications
84consuming decrypted data.
85
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -070086Unauthorized file access
87~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -040088
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -070089After an encryption key has been added, fscrypt does not hide the
90plaintext file contents or filenames from other users on the same
91system. Instead, existing access control mechanisms such as file mode
92bits, POSIX ACLs, LSMs, or namespaces should be used for this purpose.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -040093
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -070094(For the reasoning behind this, understand that while the key is
95added, the confidentiality of the data, from the perspective of the
96system itself, is *not* protected by the mathematical properties of
97encryption but rather only by the correctness of the kernel.
98Therefore, any encryption-specific access control checks would merely
99be enforced by kernel *code* and therefore would be largely redundant
100with the wide variety of access control mechanisms already available.)
101
102Kernel memory compromise
103~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
104
105An attacker who compromises the system enough to read from arbitrary
106memory, e.g. by mounting a physical attack or by exploiting a kernel
107security vulnerability, can compromise all encryption keys that are
108currently in use.
109
110However, fscrypt allows encryption keys to be removed from the kernel,
111which may protect them from later compromise.
112
113In more detail, the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl (or the
114FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS ioctl) can wipe a master
115encryption key from kernel memory. If it does so, it will also try to
116evict all cached inodes which had been "unlocked" using the key,
117thereby wiping their per-file keys and making them once again appear
118"locked", i.e. in ciphertext or encrypted form.
119
120However, these ioctls have some limitations:
121
122- Per-file keys for in-use files will *not* be removed or wiped.
123 Therefore, for maximum effect, userspace should close the relevant
124 encrypted files and directories before removing a master key, as
125 well as kill any processes whose working directory is in an affected
126 encrypted directory.
127
128- The kernel cannot magically wipe copies of the master key(s) that
129 userspace might have as well. Therefore, userspace must wipe all
130 copies of the master key(s) it makes as well; normally this should
131 be done immediately after FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY, without waiting
132 for FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY. Naturally, the same also applies
133 to all higher levels in the key hierarchy. Userspace should also
134 follow other security precautions such as mlock()ing memory
135 containing keys to prevent it from being swapped out.
136
137- In general, decrypted contents and filenames in the kernel VFS
138 caches are freed but not wiped. Therefore, portions thereof may be
139 recoverable from freed memory, even after the corresponding key(s)
140 were wiped. To partially solve this, you can set
141 CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING=y in your kernel config and add page_poison=1
142 to your kernel command line. However, this has a performance cost.
143
144- Secret keys might still exist in CPU registers, in crypto
145 accelerator hardware (if used by the crypto API to implement any of
146 the algorithms), or in other places not explicitly considered here.
147
148Limitations of v1 policies
149~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
150
151v1 encryption policies have some weaknesses with respect to online
152attacks:
153
154- There is no verification that the provided master key is correct.
155 Therefore, a malicious user can temporarily associate the wrong key
156 with another user's encrypted files to which they have read-only
157 access. Because of filesystem caching, the wrong key will then be
158 used by the other user's accesses to those files, even if the other
159 user has the correct key in their own keyring. This violates the
160 meaning of "read-only access".
161
162- A compromise of a per-file key also compromises the master key from
163 which it was derived.
164
165- Non-root users cannot securely remove encryption keys.
166
167All the above problems are fixed with v2 encryption policies. For
168this reason among others, it is recommended to use v2 encryption
169policies on all new encrypted directories.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400170
171Key hierarchy
172=============
173
174Master Keys
175-----------
176
177Each encrypted directory tree is protected by a *master key*. Master
178keys can be up to 64 bytes long, and must be at least as long as the
179greater of the key length needed by the contents and filenames
180encryption modes being used. For example, if AES-256-XTS is used for
181contents encryption, the master key must be 64 bytes (512 bits). Note
182that the XTS mode is defined to require a key twice as long as that
183required by the underlying block cipher.
184
185To "unlock" an encrypted directory tree, userspace must provide the
186appropriate master key. There can be any number of master keys, each
187of which protects any number of directory trees on any number of
188filesystems.
189
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700190Master keys must be real cryptographic keys, i.e. indistinguishable
191from random bytestrings of the same length. This implies that users
192**must not** directly use a password as a master key, zero-pad a
193shorter key, or repeat a shorter key. Security cannot be guaranteed
194if userspace makes any such error, as the cryptographic proofs and
195analysis would no longer apply.
196
197Instead, users should generate master keys either using a
198cryptographically secure random number generator, or by using a KDF
199(Key Derivation Function). The kernel does not do any key stretching;
200therefore, if userspace derives the key from a low-entropy secret such
201as a passphrase, it is critical that a KDF designed for this purpose
202be used, such as scrypt, PBKDF2, or Argon2.
203
204Key derivation function
205-----------------------
206
207With one exception, fscrypt never uses the master key(s) for
208encryption directly. Instead, they are only used as input to a KDF
209(Key Derivation Function) to derive the actual keys.
210
211The KDF used for a particular master key differs depending on whether
212the key is used for v1 encryption policies or for v2 encryption
213policies. Users **must not** use the same key for both v1 and v2
214encryption policies. (No real-world attack is currently known on this
215specific case of key reuse, but its security cannot be guaranteed
216since the cryptographic proofs and analysis would no longer apply.)
217
218For v1 encryption policies, the KDF only supports deriving per-file
219encryption keys. It works by encrypting the master key with
220AES-128-ECB, using the file's 16-byte nonce as the AES key. The
221resulting ciphertext is used as the derived key. If the ciphertext is
222longer than needed, then it is truncated to the needed length.
223
224For v2 encryption policies, the KDF is HKDF-SHA512. The master key is
225passed as the "input keying material", no salt is used, and a distinct
226"application-specific information string" is used for each distinct
227key to be derived. For example, when a per-file encryption key is
228derived, the application-specific information string is the file's
229nonce prefixed with "fscrypt\\0" and a context byte. Different
230context bytes are used for other types of derived keys.
231
232HKDF-SHA512 is preferred to the original AES-128-ECB based KDF because
233HKDF is more flexible, is nonreversible, and evenly distributes
234entropy from the master key. HKDF is also standardized and widely
235used by other software, whereas the AES-128-ECB based KDF is ad-hoc.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400236
237Per-file keys
238-------------
239
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500240Since each master key can protect many files, it is necessary to
241"tweak" the encryption of each file so that the same plaintext in two
242files doesn't map to the same ciphertext, or vice versa. In most
243cases, fscrypt does this by deriving per-file keys. When a new
244encrypted inode (regular file, directory, or symlink) is created,
245fscrypt randomly generates a 16-byte nonce and stores it in the
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700246inode's encryption xattr. Then, it uses a KDF (as described in `Key
247derivation function`_) to derive the file's key from the master key
248and nonce.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400249
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500250Key derivation was chosen over key wrapping because wrapped keys would
251require larger xattrs which would be less likely to fit in-line in the
252filesystem's inode table, and there didn't appear to be any
253significant advantages to key wrapping. In particular, currently
254there is no requirement to support unlocking a file with multiple
255alternative master keys or to support rotating master keys. Instead,
256the master keys may be wrapped in userspace, e.g. as is done by the
257`fscrypt <https://github.com/google/fscrypt>`_ tool.
258
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -0700259DIRECT_KEY policies
260-------------------
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700261
262The Adiantum encryption mode (see `Encryption modes and usage`_) is
263suitable for both contents and filenames encryption, and it accepts
264long IVs --- long enough to hold both an 8-byte logical block number
265and a 16-byte per-file nonce. Also, the overhead of each Adiantum key
266is greater than that of an AES-256-XTS key.
267
268Therefore, to improve performance and save memory, for Adiantum a
269"direct key" configuration is supported. When the user has enabled
270this by setting FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY in the fscrypt policy,
271per-file keys are not used. Instead, whenever any data (contents or
272filenames) is encrypted, the file's 16-byte nonce is included in the
273IV. Moreover:
274
275- For v1 encryption policies, the encryption is done directly with the
276 master key. Because of this, users **must not** use the same master
277 key for any other purpose, even for other v1 policies.
278
279- For v2 encryption policies, the encryption is done with a per-mode
280 key derived using the KDF. Users may use the same master key for
281 other v2 encryption policies.
282
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -0700283IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies
284-----------------------
285
286When FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64 is set in the fscrypt policy,
287the encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode
288number, and filesystem UUID. This normally results in all files
289protected by the same master key sharing a single contents encryption
290key and a single filenames encryption key. To still encrypt different
291files' data differently, inode numbers are included in the IVs.
292Consequently, shrinking the filesystem may not be allowed.
293
294This format is optimized for use with inline encryption hardware
295compliant with the UFS or eMMC standards, which support only 64 IV
296bits per I/O request and may have only a small number of keyslots.
297
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700298Key identifiers
299---------------
300
301For master keys used for v2 encryption policies, a unique 16-byte "key
302identifier" is also derived using the KDF. This value is stored in
303the clear, since it is needed to reliably identify the key itself.
304
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400305Encryption modes and usage
306==========================
307
308fscrypt allows one encryption mode to be specified for file contents
309and one encryption mode to be specified for filenames. Different
310directory trees are permitted to use different encryption modes.
311Currently, the following pairs of encryption modes are supported:
312
313- AES-256-XTS for contents and AES-256-CTS-CBC for filenames
314- AES-128-CBC for contents and AES-128-CTS-CBC for filenames
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500315- Adiantum for both contents and filenames
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400316
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500317If unsure, you should use the (AES-256-XTS, AES-256-CTS-CBC) pair.
318
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400319AES-128-CBC was added only for low-powered embedded devices with
Eric Biggersadbd9b42019-06-20 11:15:05 -0700320crypto accelerators such as CAAM or CESA that do not support XTS. To
Eric Biggers4006d792019-10-09 16:34:16 -0700321use AES-128-CBC, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ESSIV and CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256 (or
322another SHA-256 implementation) must be enabled so that ESSIV can be
323used.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400324
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500325Adiantum is a (primarily) stream cipher-based mode that is fast even
326on CPUs without dedicated crypto instructions. It's also a true
327wide-block mode, unlike XTS. It can also eliminate the need to derive
328per-file keys. However, it depends on the security of two primitives,
329XChaCha12 and AES-256, rather than just one. See the paper
330"Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors"
331(https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. To use
332Adiantum, CONFIG_CRYPTO_ADIANTUM must be enabled. Also, fast
333implementations of ChaCha and NHPoly1305 should be enabled, e.g.
334CONFIG_CRYPTO_CHACHA20_NEON and CONFIG_CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON for ARM.
335
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400336New encryption modes can be added relatively easily, without changes
337to individual filesystems. However, authenticated encryption (AE)
338modes are not currently supported because of the difficulty of dealing
339with ciphertext expansion.
340
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500341Contents encryption
342-------------------
343
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400344For file contents, each filesystem block is encrypted independently.
Chandan Rajendra196624e2019-10-22 20:33:12 -0700345Starting from Linux kernel 5.5, encryption of filesystems with block
346size less than system's page size is supported.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400347
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500348Each block's IV is set to the logical block number within the file as
349a little endian number, except that:
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400350
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500351- With CBC mode encryption, ESSIV is also used. Specifically, each IV
352 is encrypted with AES-256 where the AES-256 key is the SHA-256 hash
353 of the file's data encryption key.
354
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -0700355- With `DIRECT_KEY policies`_, the file's nonce is appended to the IV.
356 Currently this is only allowed with the Adiantum encryption mode.
357
358- With `IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies`_, the logical block number is limited
359 to 32 bits and is placed in bits 0-31 of the IV. The inode number
360 (which is also limited to 32 bits) is placed in bits 32-63.
361
362Note that because file logical block numbers are included in the IVs,
363filesystems must enforce that blocks are never shifted around within
364encrypted files, e.g. via "collapse range" or "insert range".
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500365
366Filenames encryption
367--------------------
368
369For filenames, each full filename is encrypted at once. Because of
370the requirements to retain support for efficient directory lookups and
371filenames of up to 255 bytes, the same IV is used for every filename
372in a directory.
373
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -0700374However, each encrypted directory still uses a unique key, or
375alternatively has the file's nonce (for `DIRECT_KEY policies`_) or
376inode number (for `IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies`_) included in the IVs.
377Thus, IV reuse is limited to within a single directory.
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500378
379With CTS-CBC, the IV reuse means that when the plaintext filenames
380share a common prefix at least as long as the cipher block size (16
381bytes for AES), the corresponding encrypted filenames will also share
382a common prefix. This is undesirable. Adiantum does not have this
383weakness, as it is a wide-block encryption mode.
384
385All supported filenames encryption modes accept any plaintext length
386>= 16 bytes; cipher block alignment is not required. However,
387filenames shorter than 16 bytes are NUL-padded to 16 bytes before
388being encrypted. In addition, to reduce leakage of filename lengths
389via their ciphertexts, all filenames are NUL-padded to the next 4, 8,
39016, or 32-byte boundary (configurable). 32 is recommended since this
391provides the best confidentiality, at the cost of making directory
392entries consume slightly more space. Note that since NUL (``\0``) is
393not otherwise a valid character in filenames, the padding will never
394produce duplicate plaintexts.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400395
396Symbolic link targets are considered a type of filename and are
Eric Biggers8094c3c2019-01-06 08:36:21 -0500397encrypted in the same way as filenames in directory entries, except
398that IV reuse is not a problem as each symlink has its own inode.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400399
400User API
401========
402
403Setting an encryption policy
404----------------------------
405
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700406FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
407~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
408
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400409The FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl sets an encryption policy on an
410empty directory or verifies that a directory or regular file already
411has the specified encryption policy. It takes in a pointer to a
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700412:c:type:`struct fscrypt_policy_v1` or a :c:type:`struct
413fscrypt_policy_v2`, defined as follows::
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400414
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700415 #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1 0
416 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE 8
417 struct fscrypt_policy_v1 {
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400418 __u8 version;
419 __u8 contents_encryption_mode;
420 __u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
421 __u8 flags;
Eric Biggers2336d0d2019-08-04 19:35:44 -0700422 __u8 master_key_descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400423 };
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700424 #define fscrypt_policy fscrypt_policy_v1
425
426 #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2 2
427 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE 16
428 struct fscrypt_policy_v2 {
429 __u8 version;
430 __u8 contents_encryption_mode;
431 __u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
432 __u8 flags;
433 __u8 __reserved[4];
434 __u8 master_key_identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
435 };
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400436
437This structure must be initialized as follows:
438
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700439- ``version`` must be FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1 (0) if the struct is
440 :c:type:`fscrypt_policy_v1` or FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2 (2) if the struct
441 is :c:type:`fscrypt_policy_v2`. (Note: we refer to the original
442 policy version as "v1", though its version code is really 0.) For
443 new encrypted directories, use v2 policies.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400444
445- ``contents_encryption_mode`` and ``filenames_encryption_mode`` must
Eric Biggers2336d0d2019-08-04 19:35:44 -0700446 be set to constants from ``<linux/fscrypt.h>`` which identify the
447 encryption modes to use. If unsure, use FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS
448 (1) for ``contents_encryption_mode`` and FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS
449 (4) for ``filenames_encryption_mode``.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400450
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -0700451- ``flags`` contains optional flags from ``<linux/fscrypt.h>``:
452
453 - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_*: The amount of NUL padding to use when
454 encrypting filenames. If unsure, use FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32
455 (0x3).
456 - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY: See `DIRECT_KEY policies`_.
457 - FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64: See `IV_INO_LBLK_64
458 policies`_. This is mutually exclusive with DIRECT_KEY and is not
459 supported on v1 policies.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400460
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700461- For v2 encryption policies, ``__reserved`` must be zeroed.
462
463- For v1 encryption policies, ``master_key_descriptor`` specifies how
464 to find the master key in a keyring; see `Adding keys`_. It is up
465 to userspace to choose a unique ``master_key_descriptor`` for each
466 master key. The e4crypt and fscrypt tools use the first 8 bytes of
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400467 ``SHA-512(SHA-512(master_key))``, but this particular scheme is not
468 required. Also, the master key need not be in the keyring yet when
469 FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executed. However, it must be added
470 before any files can be created in the encrypted directory.
471
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700472 For v2 encryption policies, ``master_key_descriptor`` has been
473 replaced with ``master_key_identifier``, which is longer and cannot
474 be arbitrarily chosen. Instead, the key must first be added using
475 `FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_. Then, the ``key_spec.u.identifier``
476 the kernel returned in the :c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg` must
477 be used as the ``master_key_identifier`` in the :c:type:`struct
478 fscrypt_policy_v2`.
479
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400480If the file is not yet encrypted, then FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
481verifies that the file is an empty directory. If so, the specified
482encryption policy is assigned to the directory, turning it into an
483encrypted directory. After that, and after providing the
484corresponding master key as described in `Adding keys`_, all regular
485files, directories (recursively), and symlinks created in the
486directory will be encrypted, inheriting the same encryption policy.
487The filenames in the directory's entries will be encrypted as well.
488
489Alternatively, if the file is already encrypted, then
490FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY validates that the specified encryption
491policy exactly matches the actual one. If they match, then the ioctl
492returns 0. Otherwise, it fails with EEXIST. This works on both
493regular files and directories, including nonempty directories.
494
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700495When a v2 encryption policy is assigned to a directory, it is also
496required that either the specified key has been added by the current
497user or that the caller has CAP_FOWNER in the initial user namespace.
498(This is needed to prevent a user from encrypting their data with
499another user's key.) The key must remain added while
500FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executing. However, if the new
501encrypted directory does not need to be accessed immediately, then the
502key can be removed right away afterwards.
503
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400504Note that the ext4 filesystem does not allow the root directory to be
505encrypted, even if it is empty. Users who want to encrypt an entire
506filesystem with one key should consider using dm-crypt instead.
507
508FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can fail with the following errors:
509
510- ``EACCES``: the file is not owned by the process's uid, nor does the
511 process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in a namespace with the file
512 owner's uid mapped
513- ``EEXIST``: the file is already encrypted with an encryption policy
514 different from the one specified
515- ``EINVAL``: an invalid encryption policy was specified (invalid
Daniel Rosenberg6e1918c2020-01-20 14:31:56 -0800516 version, mode(s), or flags; or reserved bits were set); or a v1
517 encryption policy was specified but the directory has the casefold
518 flag enabled (casefolding is incompatible with v1 policies).
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700519- ``ENOKEY``: a v2 encryption policy was specified, but the key with
520 the specified ``master_key_identifier`` has not been added, nor does
521 the process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in the initial user
522 namespace
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400523- ``ENOTDIR``: the file is unencrypted and is a regular file, not a
524 directory
525- ``ENOTEMPTY``: the file is unencrypted and is a nonempty directory
526- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
527- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
Chandan Rajendra643fa9612018-12-12 15:20:12 +0530528 support for filesystems, or the filesystem superblock has not
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400529 had encryption enabled on it. (For example, to use encryption on an
Chandan Rajendra643fa9612018-12-12 15:20:12 +0530530 ext4 filesystem, CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION must be enabled in the
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400531 kernel config, and the superblock must have had the "encrypt"
532 feature flag enabled using ``tune2fs -O encrypt`` or ``mkfs.ext4 -O
533 encrypt``.)
534- ``EPERM``: this directory may not be encrypted, e.g. because it is
535 the root directory of an ext4 filesystem
536- ``EROFS``: the filesystem is readonly
537
538Getting an encryption policy
539----------------------------
540
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700541Two ioctls are available to get a file's encryption policy:
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400542
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700543- `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX`_
544- `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY`_
545
546The extended (_EX) version of the ioctl is more general and is
547recommended to use when possible. However, on older kernels only the
548original ioctl is available. Applications should try the extended
549version, and if it fails with ENOTTY fall back to the original
550version.
551
552FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX
553~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
554
555The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX ioctl retrieves the encryption
556policy, if any, for a directory or regular file. No additional
557permissions are required beyond the ability to open the file. It
558takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg`,
559defined as follows::
560
561 struct fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg {
562 __u64 policy_size; /* input/output */
563 union {
564 __u8 version;
565 struct fscrypt_policy_v1 v1;
566 struct fscrypt_policy_v2 v2;
567 } policy; /* output */
568 };
569
570The caller must initialize ``policy_size`` to the size available for
571the policy struct, i.e. ``sizeof(arg.policy)``.
572
573On success, the policy struct is returned in ``policy``, and its
574actual size is returned in ``policy_size``. ``policy.version`` should
575be checked to determine the version of policy returned. Note that the
576version code for the "v1" policy is actually 0 (FSCRYPT_POLICY_V1).
577
578FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX can fail with the following errors:
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400579
580- ``EINVAL``: the file is encrypted, but it uses an unrecognized
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700581 encryption policy version
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400582- ``ENODATA``: the file is not encrypted
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700583- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption,
584 or this kernel is too old to support FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX
585 (try FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY instead)
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400586- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
Chao Yu0642ea22019-08-04 17:56:43 +0800587 support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
588 had encryption enabled on it
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700589- ``EOVERFLOW``: the file is encrypted and uses a recognized
590 encryption policy version, but the policy struct does not fit into
591 the provided buffer
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400592
593Note: if you only need to know whether a file is encrypted or not, on
594most filesystems it is also possible to use the FS_IOC_GETFLAGS ioctl
595and check for FS_ENCRYPT_FL, or to use the statx() system call and
596check for STATX_ATTR_ENCRYPTED in stx_attributes.
597
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700598FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
599~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
600
601The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl can also retrieve the
602encryption policy, if any, for a directory or regular file. However,
603unlike `FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX`_,
604FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY only supports the original policy
605version. It takes in a pointer directly to a :c:type:`struct
606fscrypt_policy_v1` rather than a :c:type:`struct
607fscrypt_get_policy_ex_arg`.
608
609The error codes for FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY are the same as those
610for FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX, except that
611FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY also returns ``EINVAL`` if the file is
612encrypted using a newer encryption policy version.
613
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400614Getting the per-filesystem salt
615-------------------------------
616
617Some filesystems, such as ext4 and F2FS, also support the deprecated
618ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT. This ioctl retrieves a randomly
619generated 16-byte value stored in the filesystem superblock. This
620value is intended to used as a salt when deriving an encryption key
621from a passphrase or other low-entropy user credential.
622
623FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT is deprecated. Instead, prefer to
624generate and manage any needed salt(s) in userspace.
625
626Adding keys
627-----------
628
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700629FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY
630~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
631
632The FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl adds a master encryption key to
633the filesystem, making all files on the filesystem which were
634encrypted using that key appear "unlocked", i.e. in plaintext form.
635It can be executed on any file or directory on the target filesystem,
636but using the filesystem's root directory is recommended. It takes in
637a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg`, defined as
638follows::
639
640 struct fscrypt_add_key_arg {
641 struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
642 __u32 raw_size;
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800643 __u32 key_id;
644 __u32 __reserved[8];
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700645 __u8 raw[];
646 };
647
648 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR 1
649 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER 2
650
651 struct fscrypt_key_specifier {
652 __u32 type; /* one of FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_* */
653 __u32 __reserved;
654 union {
655 __u8 __reserved[32]; /* reserve some extra space */
656 __u8 descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
657 __u8 identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
658 } u;
659 };
660
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800661 struct fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload {
662 __u32 type;
663 __u32 __reserved;
664 __u8 raw[];
665 };
666
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700667:c:type:`struct fscrypt_add_key_arg` must be zeroed, then initialized
668as follows:
669
670- If the key is being added for use by v1 encryption policies, then
671 ``key_spec.type`` must contain FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR, and
672 ``key_spec.u.descriptor`` must contain the descriptor of the key
673 being added, corresponding to the value in the
674 ``master_key_descriptor`` field of :c:type:`struct
675 fscrypt_policy_v1`. To add this type of key, the calling process
676 must have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial user
677 namespace.
678
679 Alternatively, if the key is being added for use by v2 encryption
680 policies, then ``key_spec.type`` must contain
681 FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER, and ``key_spec.u.identifier`` is
682 an *output* field which the kernel fills in with a cryptographic
683 hash of the key. To add this type of key, the calling process does
684 not need any privileges. However, the number of keys that can be
685 added is limited by the user's quota for the keyrings service (see
686 ``Documentation/security/keys/core.rst``).
687
688- ``raw_size`` must be the size of the ``raw`` key provided, in bytes.
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800689 Alternatively, if ``key_id`` is nonzero, this field must be 0, since
690 in that case the size is implied by the specified Linux keyring key.
691
692- ``key_id`` is 0 if the raw key is given directly in the ``raw``
693 field. Otherwise ``key_id`` is the ID of a Linux keyring key of
694 type "fscrypt-provisioning" whose payload is a :c:type:`struct
695 fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload` whose ``raw`` field contains the
696 raw key and whose ``type`` field matches ``key_spec.type``. Since
697 ``raw`` is variable-length, the total size of this key's payload
698 must be ``sizeof(struct fscrypt_provisioning_key_payload)`` plus the
699 raw key size. The process must have Search permission on this key.
700
701 Most users should leave this 0 and specify the raw key directly.
702 The support for specifying a Linux keyring key is intended mainly to
703 allow re-adding keys after a filesystem is unmounted and re-mounted,
704 without having to store the raw keys in userspace memory.
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700705
706- ``raw`` is a variable-length field which must contain the actual
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800707 key, ``raw_size`` bytes long. Alternatively, if ``key_id`` is
708 nonzero, then this field is unused.
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700709
710For v2 policy keys, the kernel keeps track of which user (identified
711by effective user ID) added the key, and only allows the key to be
712removed by that user --- or by "root", if they use
713`FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS`_.
714
715However, if another user has added the key, it may be desirable to
716prevent that other user from unexpectedly removing it. Therefore,
717FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY may also be used to add a v2 policy key
718*again*, even if it's already added by other user(s). In this case,
719FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY will just install a claim to the key for the
720current user, rather than actually add the key again (but the raw key
721must still be provided, as a proof of knowledge).
722
723FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY returns 0 if either the key or a claim to
724the key was either added or already exists.
725
726FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY can fail with the following errors:
727
728- ``EACCES``: FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR was specified, but the
729 caller does not have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800730 user namespace; or the raw key was specified by Linux key ID but the
731 process lacks Search permission on the key.
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700732- ``EDQUOT``: the key quota for this user would be exceeded by adding
733 the key
734- ``EINVAL``: invalid key size or key specifier type, or reserved bits
735 were set
Eric Biggers93edd392019-11-19 14:24:47 -0800736- ``EKEYREJECTED``: the raw key was specified by Linux key ID, but the
737 key has the wrong type
738- ``ENOKEY``: the raw key was specified by Linux key ID, but no key
739 exists with that ID
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700740- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
741- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
742 support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
743 had encryption enabled on it
744
745Legacy method
746~~~~~~~~~~~~~
747
748For v1 encryption policies, a master encryption key can also be
749provided by adding it to a process-subscribed keyring, e.g. to a
750session keyring, or to a user keyring if the user keyring is linked
751into the session keyring.
752
753This method is deprecated (and not supported for v2 encryption
754policies) for several reasons. First, it cannot be used in
755combination with FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY (see `Removing keys`_),
756so for removing a key a workaround such as keyctl_unlink() in
757combination with ``sync; echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches`` would
758have to be used. Second, it doesn't match the fact that the
759locked/unlocked status of encrypted files (i.e. whether they appear to
760be in plaintext form or in ciphertext form) is global. This mismatch
761has caused much confusion as well as real problems when processes
762running under different UIDs, such as a ``sudo`` command, need to
763access encrypted files.
764
765Nevertheless, to add a key to one of the process-subscribed keyrings,
766the add_key() system call can be used (see:
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400767``Documentation/security/keys/core.rst``). The key type must be
768"logon"; keys of this type are kept in kernel memory and cannot be
769read back by userspace. The key description must be "fscrypt:"
770followed by the 16-character lower case hex representation of the
771``master_key_descriptor`` that was set in the encryption policy. The
772key payload must conform to the following structure::
773
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700774 #define FSCRYPT_MAX_KEY_SIZE 64
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400775
776 struct fscrypt_key {
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700777 __u32 mode;
778 __u8 raw[FSCRYPT_MAX_KEY_SIZE];
779 __u32 size;
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400780 };
781
782``mode`` is ignored; just set it to 0. The actual key is provided in
783``raw`` with ``size`` indicating its size in bytes. That is, the
784bytes ``raw[0..size-1]`` (inclusive) are the actual key.
785
786The key description prefix "fscrypt:" may alternatively be replaced
787with a filesystem-specific prefix such as "ext4:". However, the
788filesystem-specific prefixes are deprecated and should not be used in
789new programs.
790
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700791Removing keys
792-------------
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400793
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -0700794Two ioctls are available for removing a key that was added by
795`FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_:
796
797- `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_
798- `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS`_
799
800These two ioctls differ only in cases where v2 policy keys are added
801or removed by non-root users.
802
803These ioctls don't work on keys that were added via the legacy
804process-subscribed keyrings mechanism.
805
806Before using these ioctls, read the `Kernel memory compromise`_
807section for a discussion of the security goals and limitations of
808these ioctls.
809
810FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY
811~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
812
813The FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl removes a claim to a master
814encryption key from the filesystem, and possibly removes the key
815itself. It can be executed on any file or directory on the target
816filesystem, but using the filesystem's root directory is recommended.
817It takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_remove_key_arg`,
818defined as follows::
819
820 struct fscrypt_remove_key_arg {
821 struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
822 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY 0x00000001
823 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_OTHER_USERS 0x00000002
824 __u32 removal_status_flags; /* output */
825 __u32 __reserved[5];
826 };
827
828This structure must be zeroed, then initialized as follows:
829
830- The key to remove is specified by ``key_spec``:
831
832 - To remove a key used by v1 encryption policies, set
833 ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR and fill
834 in ``key_spec.u.descriptor``. To remove this type of key, the
835 calling process must have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the
836 initial user namespace.
837
838 - To remove a key used by v2 encryption policies, set
839 ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER and fill
840 in ``key_spec.u.identifier``.
841
842For v2 policy keys, this ioctl is usable by non-root users. However,
843to make this possible, it actually just removes the current user's
844claim to the key, undoing a single call to FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY.
845Only after all claims are removed is the key really removed.
846
847For example, if FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY was called with uid 1000,
848then the key will be "claimed" by uid 1000, and
849FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY will only succeed as uid 1000. Or, if
850both uids 1000 and 2000 added the key, then for each uid
851FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY will only remove their own claim. Only
852once *both* are removed is the key really removed. (Think of it like
853unlinking a file that may have hard links.)
854
855If FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY really removes the key, it will also
856try to "lock" all files that had been unlocked with the key. It won't
857lock files that are still in-use, so this ioctl is expected to be used
858in cooperation with userspace ensuring that none of the files are
859still open. However, if necessary, this ioctl can be executed again
860later to retry locking any remaining files.
861
862FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY returns 0 if either the key was removed
863(but may still have files remaining to be locked), the user's claim to
864the key was removed, or the key was already removed but had files
865remaining to be the locked so the ioctl retried locking them. In any
866of these cases, ``removal_status_flags`` is filled in with the
867following informational status flags:
868
869- ``FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY``: set if some file(s)
870 are still in-use. Not guaranteed to be set in the case where only
871 the user's claim to the key was removed.
872- ``FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_OTHER_USERS``: set if only the
873 user's claim to the key was removed, not the key itself
874
875FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY can fail with the following errors:
876
877- ``EACCES``: The FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR key specifier type
878 was specified, but the caller does not have the CAP_SYS_ADMIN
879 capability in the initial user namespace
880- ``EINVAL``: invalid key specifier type, or reserved bits were set
881- ``ENOKEY``: the key object was not found at all, i.e. it was never
882 added in the first place or was already fully removed including all
883 files locked; or, the user does not have a claim to the key (but
884 someone else does).
885- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
886- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
887 support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
888 had encryption enabled on it
889
890FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS
891~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
892
893FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS is exactly the same as
894`FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_, except that for v2 policy keys, the
895ALL_USERS version of the ioctl will remove all users' claims to the
896key, not just the current user's. I.e., the key itself will always be
897removed, no matter how many users have added it. This difference is
898only meaningful if non-root users are adding and removing keys.
899
900Because of this, FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS also requires
901"root", namely the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in the initial user
902namespace. Otherwise it will fail with EACCES.
903
904Getting key status
905------------------
906
907FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS
908~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
909
910The FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS ioctl retrieves the status of a
911master encryption key. It can be executed on any file or directory on
912the target filesystem, but using the filesystem's root directory is
913recommended. It takes in a pointer to a :c:type:`struct
914fscrypt_get_key_status_arg`, defined as follows::
915
916 struct fscrypt_get_key_status_arg {
917 /* input */
918 struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec;
919 __u32 __reserved[6];
920
921 /* output */
922 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_ABSENT 1
923 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_PRESENT 2
924 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_INCOMPLETELY_REMOVED 3
925 __u32 status;
926 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_FLAG_ADDED_BY_SELF 0x00000001
927 __u32 status_flags;
928 __u32 user_count;
929 __u32 __out_reserved[13];
930 };
931
932The caller must zero all input fields, then fill in ``key_spec``:
933
934 - To get the status of a key for v1 encryption policies, set
935 ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR and fill
936 in ``key_spec.u.descriptor``.
937
938 - To get the status of a key for v2 encryption policies, set
939 ``key_spec.type`` to FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER and fill
940 in ``key_spec.u.identifier``.
941
942On success, 0 is returned and the kernel fills in the output fields:
943
944- ``status`` indicates whether the key is absent, present, or
945 incompletely removed. Incompletely removed means that the master
946 secret has been removed, but some files are still in use; i.e.,
947 `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_ returned 0 but set the informational
948 status flag FSCRYPT_KEY_REMOVAL_STATUS_FLAG_FILES_BUSY.
949
950- ``status_flags`` can contain the following flags:
951
952 - ``FSCRYPT_KEY_STATUS_FLAG_ADDED_BY_SELF`` indicates that the key
953 has added by the current user. This is only set for keys
954 identified by ``identifier`` rather than by ``descriptor``.
955
956- ``user_count`` specifies the number of users who have added the key.
957 This is only set for keys identified by ``identifier`` rather than
958 by ``descriptor``.
959
960FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can fail with the following errors:
961
962- ``EINVAL``: invalid key specifier type, or reserved bits were set
963- ``ENOTTY``: this type of filesystem does not implement encryption
964- ``EOPNOTSUPP``: the kernel was not configured with encryption
965 support for this filesystem, or the filesystem superblock has not
966 had encryption enabled on it
967
968Among other use cases, FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can be useful
969for determining whether the key for a given encrypted directory needs
970to be added before prompting the user for the passphrase needed to
971derive the key.
972
973FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS can only get the status of keys in
974the filesystem-level keyring, i.e. the keyring managed by
975`FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_ and `FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY`_. It
976cannot get the status of a key that has only been added for use by v1
977encryption policies using the legacy mechanism involving
978process-subscribed keyrings.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400979
980Access semantics
981================
982
983With the key
984------------
985
986With the encryption key, encrypted regular files, directories, and
987symlinks behave very similarly to their unencrypted counterparts ---
988after all, the encryption is intended to be transparent. However,
989astute users may notice some differences in behavior:
990
991- Unencrypted files, or files encrypted with a different encryption
992 policy (i.e. different key, modes, or flags), cannot be renamed or
993 linked into an encrypted directory; see `Encryption policy
Eric Biggersf5e55e72019-01-22 16:20:21 -0800994 enforcement`_. Attempts to do so will fail with EXDEV. However,
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -0400995 encrypted files can be renamed within an encrypted directory, or
996 into an unencrypted directory.
997
Eric Biggersf5e55e72019-01-22 16:20:21 -0800998 Note: "moving" an unencrypted file into an encrypted directory, e.g.
999 with the `mv` program, is implemented in userspace by a copy
1000 followed by a delete. Be aware that the original unencrypted data
1001 may remain recoverable from free space on the disk; prefer to keep
1002 all files encrypted from the very beginning. The `shred` program
1003 may be used to overwrite the source files but isn't guaranteed to be
1004 effective on all filesystems and storage devices.
1005
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001006- Direct I/O is not supported on encrypted files. Attempts to use
1007 direct I/O on such files will fall back to buffered I/O.
1008
1009- The fallocate operations FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE,
1010 FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE, and FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE are not supported
1011 on encrypted files and will fail with EOPNOTSUPP.
1012
1013- Online defragmentation of encrypted files is not supported. The
1014 EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT and F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE ioctls will fail with
1015 EOPNOTSUPP.
1016
1017- The ext4 filesystem does not support data journaling with encrypted
1018 regular files. It will fall back to ordered data mode instead.
1019
1020- DAX (Direct Access) is not supported on encrypted files.
1021
1022- The st_size of an encrypted symlink will not necessarily give the
1023 length of the symlink target as required by POSIX. It will actually
Eric Biggers2f46a2b2018-01-11 23:30:09 -05001024 give the length of the ciphertext, which will be slightly longer
1025 than the plaintext due to NUL-padding and an extra 2-byte overhead.
1026
1027- The maximum length of an encrypted symlink is 2 bytes shorter than
1028 the maximum length of an unencrypted symlink. For example, on an
1029 EXT4 filesystem with a 4K block size, unencrypted symlinks can be up
1030 to 4095 bytes long, while encrypted symlinks can only be up to 4093
1031 bytes long (both lengths excluding the terminating null).
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001032
1033Note that mmap *is* supported. This is possible because the pagecache
1034for an encrypted file contains the plaintext, not the ciphertext.
1035
1036Without the key
1037---------------
1038
1039Some filesystem operations may be performed on encrypted regular
1040files, directories, and symlinks even before their encryption key has
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -07001041been added, or after their encryption key has been removed:
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001042
1043- File metadata may be read, e.g. using stat().
1044
1045- Directories may be listed, in which case the filenames will be
1046 listed in an encoded form derived from their ciphertext. The
1047 current encoding algorithm is described in `Filename hashing and
1048 encoding`_. The algorithm is subject to change, but it is
1049 guaranteed that the presented filenames will be no longer than
1050 NAME_MAX bytes, will not contain the ``/`` or ``\0`` characters, and
1051 will uniquely identify directory entries.
1052
1053 The ``.`` and ``..`` directory entries are special. They are always
1054 present and are not encrypted or encoded.
1055
1056- Files may be deleted. That is, nondirectory files may be deleted
1057 with unlink() as usual, and empty directories may be deleted with
1058 rmdir() as usual. Therefore, ``rm`` and ``rm -r`` will work as
1059 expected.
1060
1061- Symlink targets may be read and followed, but they will be presented
1062 in encrypted form, similar to filenames in directories. Hence, they
1063 are unlikely to point to anywhere useful.
1064
1065Without the key, regular files cannot be opened or truncated.
1066Attempts to do so will fail with ENOKEY. This implies that any
1067regular file operations that require a file descriptor, such as
1068read(), write(), mmap(), fallocate(), and ioctl(), are also forbidden.
1069
1070Also without the key, files of any type (including directories) cannot
1071be created or linked into an encrypted directory, nor can a name in an
1072encrypted directory be the source or target of a rename, nor can an
1073O_TMPFILE temporary file be created in an encrypted directory. All
1074such operations will fail with ENOKEY.
1075
1076It is not currently possible to backup and restore encrypted files
1077without the encryption key. This would require special APIs which
1078have not yet been implemented.
1079
1080Encryption policy enforcement
1081=============================
1082
1083After an encryption policy has been set on a directory, all regular
1084files, directories, and symbolic links created in that directory
1085(recursively) will inherit that encryption policy. Special files ---
1086that is, named pipes, device nodes, and UNIX domain sockets --- will
1087not be encrypted.
1088
1089Except for those special files, it is forbidden to have unencrypted
1090files, or files encrypted with a different encryption policy, in an
1091encrypted directory tree. Attempts to link or rename such a file into
Eric Biggersf5e55e72019-01-22 16:20:21 -08001092an encrypted directory will fail with EXDEV. This is also enforced
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001093during ->lookup() to provide limited protection against offline
1094attacks that try to disable or downgrade encryption in known locations
1095where applications may later write sensitive data. It is recommended
1096that systems implementing a form of "verified boot" take advantage of
1097this by validating all top-level encryption policies prior to access.
1098
1099Implementation details
1100======================
1101
1102Encryption context
1103------------------
1104
1105An encryption policy is represented on-disk by a :c:type:`struct
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -07001106fscrypt_context_v1` or a :c:type:`struct fscrypt_context_v2`. It is
1107up to individual filesystems to decide where to store it, but normally
1108it would be stored in a hidden extended attribute. It should *not* be
1109exposed by the xattr-related system calls such as getxattr() and
1110setxattr() because of the special semantics of the encryption xattr.
1111(In particular, there would be much confusion if an encryption policy
1112were to be added to or removed from anything other than an empty
1113directory.) These structs are defined as follows::
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001114
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001115 #define FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE 16
1116
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -07001117 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE 8
1118 struct fscrypt_context_v1 {
1119 u8 version;
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001120 u8 contents_encryption_mode;
1121 u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
1122 u8 flags;
Eric Biggers2336d0d2019-08-04 19:35:44 -07001123 u8 master_key_descriptor[FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE];
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001124 u8 nonce[FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE];
1125 };
1126
Eric Biggersba13f2c2019-08-04 19:35:49 -07001127 #define FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE 16
1128 struct fscrypt_context_v2 {
1129 u8 version;
1130 u8 contents_encryption_mode;
1131 u8 filenames_encryption_mode;
1132 u8 flags;
1133 u8 __reserved[4];
1134 u8 master_key_identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE];
1135 u8 nonce[FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE];
1136 };
1137
1138The context structs contain the same information as the corresponding
1139policy structs (see `Setting an encryption policy`_), except that the
1140context structs also contain a nonce. The nonce is randomly generated
1141by the kernel and is used as KDF input or as a tweak to cause
1142different files to be encrypted differently; see `Per-file keys`_ and
Eric Biggersb103fb72019-10-24 14:54:36 -07001143`DIRECT_KEY policies`_.
Eric Biggersf4f864c2017-10-29 06:30:14 -04001144
1145Data path changes
1146-----------------
1147
1148For the read path (->readpage()) of regular files, filesystems can
1149read the ciphertext into the page cache and decrypt it in-place. The
1150page lock must be held until decryption has finished, to prevent the
1151page from becoming visible to userspace prematurely.
1152
1153For the write path (->writepage()) of regular files, filesystems
1154cannot encrypt data in-place in the page cache, since the cached
1155plaintext must be preserved. Instead, filesystems must encrypt into a
1156temporary buffer or "bounce page", then write out the temporary
1157buffer. Some filesystems, such as UBIFS, already use temporary
1158buffers regardless of encryption. Other filesystems, such as ext4 and
1159F2FS, have to allocate bounce pages specially for encryption.
1160
1161Filename hashing and encoding
1162-----------------------------
1163
1164Modern filesystems accelerate directory lookups by using indexed
1165directories. An indexed directory is organized as a tree keyed by
1166filename hashes. When a ->lookup() is requested, the filesystem
1167normally hashes the filename being looked up so that it can quickly
1168find the corresponding directory entry, if any.
1169
1170With encryption, lookups must be supported and efficient both with and
1171without the encryption key. Clearly, it would not work to hash the
1172plaintext filenames, since the plaintext filenames are unavailable
1173without the key. (Hashing the plaintext filenames would also make it
1174impossible for the filesystem's fsck tool to optimize encrypted
1175directories.) Instead, filesystems hash the ciphertext filenames,
1176i.e. the bytes actually stored on-disk in the directory entries. When
1177asked to do a ->lookup() with the key, the filesystem just encrypts
1178the user-supplied name to get the ciphertext.
1179
1180Lookups without the key are more complicated. The raw ciphertext may
1181contain the ``\0`` and ``/`` characters, which are illegal in
1182filenames. Therefore, readdir() must base64-encode the ciphertext for
1183presentation. For most filenames, this works fine; on ->lookup(), the
1184filesystem just base64-decodes the user-supplied name to get back to
1185the raw ciphertext.
1186
1187However, for very long filenames, base64 encoding would cause the
1188filename length to exceed NAME_MAX. To prevent this, readdir()
1189actually presents long filenames in an abbreviated form which encodes
1190a strong "hash" of the ciphertext filename, along with the optional
1191filesystem-specific hash(es) needed for directory lookups. This
1192allows the filesystem to still, with a high degree of confidence, map
1193the filename given in ->lookup() back to a particular directory entry
1194that was previously listed by readdir(). See :c:type:`struct
1195fscrypt_digested_name` in the source for more details.
1196
1197Note that the precise way that filenames are presented to userspace
1198without the key is subject to change in the future. It is only meant
1199as a way to temporarily present valid filenames so that commands like
1200``rm -r`` work as expected on encrypted directories.
Eric Biggers05643362019-06-20 11:16:58 -07001201
1202Tests
1203=====
1204
1205To test fscrypt, use xfstests, which is Linux's de facto standard
1206filesystem test suite. First, run all the tests in the "encrypt"
1207group on the relevant filesystem(s). For example, to test ext4 and
1208f2fs encryption using `kvm-xfstests
1209<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/kvm-quickstart.md>`_::
1210
1211 kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g encrypt
1212
1213UBIFS encryption can also be tested this way, but it should be done in
1214a separate command, and it takes some time for kvm-xfstests to set up
1215emulated UBI volumes::
1216
1217 kvm-xfstests -c ubifs -g encrypt
1218
1219No tests should fail. However, tests that use non-default encryption
1220modes (e.g. generic/549 and generic/550) will be skipped if the needed
1221algorithms were not built into the kernel's crypto API. Also, tests
1222that access the raw block device (e.g. generic/399, generic/548,
1223generic/549, generic/550) will be skipped on UBIFS.
1224
1225Besides running the "encrypt" group tests, for ext4 and f2fs it's also
1226possible to run most xfstests with the "test_dummy_encryption" mount
1227option. This option causes all new files to be automatically
1228encrypted with a dummy key, without having to make any API calls.
1229This tests the encrypted I/O paths more thoroughly. To do this with
1230kvm-xfstests, use the "encrypt" filesystem configuration::
1231
1232 kvm-xfstests -c ext4/encrypt,f2fs/encrypt -g auto
1233
1234Because this runs many more tests than "-g encrypt" does, it takes
1235much longer to run; so also consider using `gce-xfstests
1236<https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/Documentation/gce-xfstests.md>`_
1237instead of kvm-xfstests::
1238
1239 gce-xfstests -c ext4/encrypt,f2fs/encrypt -g auto