Skip to content

Grammar fix: 'disable' instead of 'do not enable'#1885

Open
ottenhoff wants to merge 1 commit into
alibaba:masterfrom
ottenhoff:grammar-disable
Open

Grammar fix: 'disable' instead of 'do not enable'#1885
ottenhoff wants to merge 1 commit into
alibaba:masterfrom
ottenhoff:grammar-disable

Conversation

@ottenhoff

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Nov 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@drawing

drawing commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

These modules are not enabled by default. Because of the error caused by explicitly enabling the module, is it better to prompt "Do not enable" than "Disable"?

@ottenhoff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I ran into the error after enabling the module. So "disabling" was the logical fix after enabling.

@drawing

drawing commented Nov 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I ran into the error after enabling the module. So "disabling" was the logical fix after enabling.

When using --enable-xxx to report an error, the error message should be to remove the --enable-xxx option, not to add the --disable-xxx option. So I think "do not enable" is better than "disable".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants