Skip to content

Conversation

@dianfu
Copy link
Contributor

@dianfu dianfu commented Sep 9, 2021

What is the purpose of the change

This pull request limits the version requests to 2.26.0 or above

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@dianfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

dianfu commented Sep 9, 2021

cc @zentol

Copy link
Contributor

@zentol zentol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Sep 9, 2021

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit d2830fd (Thu Sep 09 13:05:29 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!
  • This pull request references an unassigned Jira ticket. According to the code contribution guide, tickets need to be assigned before starting with the implementation work.

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Sep 9, 2021

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@dianfu dianfu closed this in 0cecdca Sep 10, 2021
dianfu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
dianfu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
dianfu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
dianfu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
…fore Python SDK harness connects to the Java Operator in lookback mode

This closes #17219.
dianfu added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
…fore Python SDK harness connects to the Java Operator in lookback mode

This closes #17219.
niklassemmler pushed a commit to niklassemmler/flink that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants