#9154 Fixed map crash when expanding timeline with time intervals#9155
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
@ElenaGallo Kindly test it in dev and let us know if it can be backported. Thanks! |
offtherailz
added a commit
to offtherailz/MapStore2
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
Member
Author
|
I created the backport here. #9175 |
Contributor
|
Test passed, the backport can be merged. |
dsuren1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR fixes the issue by getting a single value from time intervals, when returned by getDomainValues
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
#9154
What is the new behavior?
Fix #9154 , not crashing anymore.
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information