Skip to content

Conversation

@mattab
Copy link
Member

@mattab mattab commented Apr 9, 2018

PR should be merged before #12702

@mattab mattab added the Needs Review PRs that need a code review label Apr 9, 2018
@mattab mattab added this to the 3.5.0 milestone Apr 9, 2018
@mattab mattab changed the base branch from 3.x-dev to archivenottwice April 9, 2018 10:44
@tsteur
Copy link
Member

tsteur commented Apr 9, 2018

Looks good to me @mattab

@mattab mattab merged commit 0952700 into archivenottwice Apr 9, 2018
@mattab mattab deleted the archive_abort branch April 9, 2018 21:07
mattab pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
* Do not run the same archive command twice

* simplify

*  During core:archive when a day or period archiving fails for a website, abort the website archiving (#12708)

* If one of the period archiving fails, we now cancel the remaining archiving processes
* Increment the skipped counter

* also exit when a day period is already active

* undo last commit

* if day archive fails, then do not proceed archiving periods

* Minor changes

* Archive: mark the daily archive as successful, only after it was really successful (#12720)

+ Simplify & fix some logic

* do not archive a period when a sub period is processing (#12719)
InfinityVoid pushed a commit to InfinityVoid/matomo that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
* Do not run the same archive command twice

* simplify

*  During core:archive when a day or period archiving fails for a website, abort the website archiving (matomo-org#12708)

* If one of the period archiving fails, we now cancel the remaining archiving processes
* Increment the skipped counter

* also exit when a day period is already active

* undo last commit

* if day archive fails, then do not proceed archiving periods

* Minor changes

* Archive: mark the daily archive as successful, only after it was really successful (matomo-org#12720)

+ Simplify & fix some logic

* do not archive a period when a sub period is processing (matomo-org#12719)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Review PRs that need a code review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants