Skip to content

Conversation

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor

@juanvallejo juanvallejo commented Dec 5, 2017

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Dec 5, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 5, 2017
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Dec 6, 2017

The changes itself lgtm, but there's a rebase in flight (#17576) which will pick the first 2 commits. The 3rd one is not accepted upstream yet and will wait till next week when queue is open. I'm holding this until after the rebase lands, in that case.
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 6, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 14, 2017
@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the jvallejo/add-selector-oc-drain branch from 16ef907 to fb0aba3 Compare December 15, 2017 16:31
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 15, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 15, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Dec 15, 2017

@juanvallejo still needed?

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the jvallejo/add-selector-oc-drain branch from fb0aba3 to 3d357ed Compare December 15, 2017 18:19
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@deads2k yeah the pod-selector changes are the only thing new that this PR brings in post-rebase. Updated to be on par with kubernetes/kubernetes#56864

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the jvallejo/add-selector-oc-drain branch from 3d357ed to 6e96d68 Compare December 15, 2017 18:21
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Dec 18, 2017

@juanvallejo this will need to be picked for 3.8 (see the BZ I assigned you today).

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mfojtik opened pick of these changes for 3.8 here: #17868

@juanvallejo juanvallejo force-pushed the jvallejo/add-selector-oc-drain branch from f51f049 to 9f49283 Compare December 18, 2017 22:08
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit

@juanvallejo juanvallejo reopened this Dec 18, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Dec 19, 2017

looks up to date

/hold cancel
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Dec 19, 2017
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, juanvallejo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 19, 2017
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_conformance_gce

2 similar comments
@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_conformance_gce

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_conformance_gce

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_conformance_install

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Dec 20, 2017

/retest

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test extended_conformance_install

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

I must say this is really hard to watch

@juanvallejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dustymabe test flakes. test flakes everywhere

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Dec 21, 2017

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 17072, 17616).

openshift-merge-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2017
…rain

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 17072, 17616).

Add --selector, --pod-selector flags `oc adm drain`

Fixes #17554
Fixes #17563
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525340

Picks kubernetes/kubernetes#52917, kubernetes/kubernetes#54083, and kubernetes/kubernetes#56864 to bring in `--selector` and `--pod-selector` flag support to `oc adm drain`.

cc @openshift/cli-review @deads2k @dustymabe
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d8c46e4 into openshift:master Dec 21, 2017
@juanvallejo juanvallejo deleted the jvallejo/add-selector-oc-drain branch December 21, 2017 15:03
openshift-merge-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants