Improvements to cheat sheet#14972
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Everyone can use future annotations now. Also forward references are the most type hinting popular question on Stack Overflow, so give a little more detail. The IO example should go with standard duck types. I moved the async example to the bottom. It basically just works as you'd expect, maybe we should remove it altogether. Linking python#13681
emmatyping
reviewed
Mar 29, 2023
emmatyping
reviewed
Mar 29, 2023
Co-authored-by: Ethan Smith <ethan@ethanhs.me>
emmatyping
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2023
JelleZijlstra
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Everyone can use future annotations now. Also forward references are the most type hinting popular question on Stack Overflow, so give a little more detail.
The IO example should go with standard duck types.
I moved the async example to the bottom. It basically just works as you'd expect, maybe we should remove it altogether.
Linking #13681