stubtest: handle overloads with mixed pos-only params#18287
Merged
Conversation
JelleZijlstra
self-requested a review
August 22, 2025 23:52
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #17023
Stubtest should only mangle positional-only parameter names if they're positional-only in all branches of the overload. The signatures get really ugly and wrong otherwise.
I'm not sure if I did the new
test_overload_signaturein the best way. I couldn't figure out a way to get covert a string into anodes.OverloadedFuncDefobject with any of the techniques in existing tests inteststubtest.py. Maybe the new test case is sufficient, but I wanted to test the signature generation directly.