Skip to content

License FAQ and Terms: More explicit about collaborations - #9815

Merged
MehmetAdemi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/license-agency-clarification
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

License FAQ and Terms: More explicit about collaborations#9815
MehmetAdemi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/license-agency-clarification

Conversation

@MehmetAdemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
bugs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 28, 2026 3:02pm
remotion Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 28, 2026 3:02pm

Request Review

@MehmetAdemi
MehmetAdemi requested a review from JonnyBurger July 28, 2026 14:40

@pullfrog pullfrog Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ No new issues found.

Reviewed changes — clarifies when a client's headcount counts toward the Remotion licensing threshold, distinguishing between "agency delivers finished media only" and "client owns or operates the Remotion project."

  • Rewrite agency FAQ answer — replaces a 2-sentence answer in faq.mdx with three clearly separated scenarios: file-only delivery, client-owned codebase, and hiring subcontractors.
  • Update #TeamSize in terms — adds a definition of "involved parties," splits collaborative and file-only-delivery scenarios into separate paragraphs, and adds a clarifying example.
  • Update #LicenceOwnership in terms — scopes the section to collaborative engagements where the client owns the codebase and adds a contrast for studio-owned projects.
  • Add example to #Partnerships — adds a concrete three-person production studio example that mirrors the FAQ scenario.

Pullfrog  | View workflow run | Using DeepSeek Pro (free via Pullfrog for OSS) (Claude Opus not used — the program covers this model; add its provider key to run your pick) | 𝕏

@JonnyBurger JonnyBurger left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
I wish the terms were shorter, but if you see no way to condense, 👍 to merging it

@MehmetAdemi
MehmetAdemi merged commit 2f14144 into main Jul 28, 2026
17 checks passed
@MehmetAdemi
MehmetAdemi deleted the docs/license-agency-clarification branch July 28, 2026 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants