Metadata

URI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
Namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
homepage http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
Description This is the RDF Schema for the RDF vocabulary terms in the RDF Namespace, defined in RDF 1.1 Concepts. @en
Language
Creator
Markus Lanthaler
http://www.markus-lanthaler.com/
Contributor
David Wood
http://about.me/david_wood
Richard Cyganiak
http://richard.cyganiak.de/foaf.rdf#cygri
Publisher
W3C
http://www.w3.org/data#W3C
Comment
(2014-06-13) Bernard Vatant: The vocabulary of vocabularies is itself linked to others that build on it : it relies on RDFS as well as OWL and Dublin Core for metadata in the latest version. The namespace is keeping track of the first release 1999-02-22. If a vocabulary in LOV pretends it was issued before this date, it's certainly a bug.
(2015-07-11) Ghislain Atemezing: Annual review OK.
(2017-03-09) Ghislain Atemezing: Annual review OK.
(2021-03-07) Ghislain Atemezing: New additions to RDF in 2019 ( rdf:JSON, rdf:direction) without proper metadata (https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-03-05.html#t04). That's not what we can call best practice publishing from W3C vocabulary. Who is to blame? :)

999 Incoming Links

4 Outgoing Links

Vocabulary Version History