In a series of drafts, under the name of “Fuzzy time and the impact of it on Science” the author reaches to define “Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation”. Here, first we explain the importance of this theory (four reasons in redlines), second how to develop it.

Abstract This article, A Bridge of Continuity in the History of Iran: Sasanids, Samanids & Albuyeh, Seljukids and Safavids, explores the enduring thread of Iranian identity across successive dynasties from late antiquity to the early modern era. It argues that despite political ruptures and shifting centers of power, a symbolic and institutional continuity persisted, linking the Sasanid legacy to the Persianate formations of the Samanids and Albuyeh, the imperial structures of the Seljuks, and the cultural renaissance of the Safavids. By (...) examining dynastic legitimacy, cultural synthesis, and the transmission of shared traditions, the paper highlights how these regimes collectively sustained a civilizational umbrella under which diverse communities reconciled and coexisted. The study proposes a comparative framework—contrasting rival theories of discontinuity with a model of cultural resilience—to demonstrate that Iran’s historical trajectory is best understood as a bridge of continuity rather than a sequence of isolated episodes. This perspective invites interdisciplinary reflection on the mechanisms of cultural endurance, the role of institutions in mediating reconciliation, and the symbolic power of kingship in shaping collective identity. Theory C is proposed here; by using it together with the discussions provided by Theory A and Theory B, we establish a background for further investigation and historical debates. (shrink)

In a series of drafts, under the name of “Fuzzy time and the impact of it on Science,” we try to show how fuzzy modeling of time could impact science especially Complexity theory and Physics. Throughout this paper, by introducing Generalized Surprise Exam Paradox (GSEP) we show the problem is more general than concept of time.

Here, we try to show that the method used in Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation(TC * vs TC, TQC). 2023. ￿hal-04330281￿ is a general method that sheds light on various types of problems. The author choose the navier stocks problem, to check the possibility of solving this problem by this method. This text is a guideline of possible proof of this problem.

Although Fuzzy logic and Fuzzy Mathematics is a widespread subject and there is a vast literature about it, yet the use of Fuzzy issues like Fuzzy sets and Fuzzy numbers was relatively rare in time concept. This could be seen in the Fuzzy time series. In addition, some attempts are done in fuzzing Turing Machines but seemingly there is no need to fuzzy time. Throughout this article, we try to change this picture and show why it is helpful to consider (...) the instants of time as Fuzzy numbers. In physics, though there are revolutionary ideas on the time concept like B theories in contrast to A theory also about central concepts like space, momentum… it is a long time that these concepts are changed, but time is considered classically in all well-known and established physics theories. Seemingly, we stick to the classical time concept in all fields of science and we have a vast inertia to change it. Our goal in this article is to provide some bases why it is rational and reasonable to change and modify this picture. Here, the central point is the modified version of “Unexpected Hanging” paradox as it is described in "Is classical Mathematics appropriate for theory of Computation".This modified version leads us to a contradiction and based on that it is presented there why some problems in Theory of Computation are not solved yet. To resolve the difficulties arising there, we have two choices. Either “choosing” a new type of Logic like “Para-consistent Logic” to tolerate contradiction or changing and improving the time concept and consequently to modify the “Turing Computational Model”. Throughout this paper, we select the second way for benefiting from saving some aspects of Classical Logic. In chapter 2, by applying quantum Mechanics and Schrodinger equation we compute the associated fuzzy number to time. (shrink)

This paper explores the paradoxical claim “This article is not written by helping AI.” On the one hand, if AI contributes to the drafting process, the claim appears false. On the other hand, if authorship requires semantic intention and responsibility, then the claim may be true even when AI generates text. Drawing on Searle’s Chinese Room, Tarski’s theory of truth, and debates on authorship in philosophy of language, I argue that authorship requires intentionality and responsibility, which AI systems lack. The (...) paradox is resolved by distinguishing between syntactic production and semantic authorship. AI can assist in generating words, but authorship remains a human act of responsibility. -/- (This article is distinctive in nature, and its central problem is: who is the author?) Farzad Didehvar provided an AI system with only a single phrase in Persian, which translates into English as: “This article is not written by Helping AI.” From that seed, the AI generated a complete article in English. The article itself argues—semantically—that it was not written by an AI tool. At the same time, it was not literally written by Farzad either, since he only supplied the initial phrase. This raises a paradoxical question: if the article is neither authored by the AI nor by the human, then who is the true writer? An answer will be provided in the next article, but the author is interested in hearing other opinions. (shrink)

In [1], we give a modeling of fuzzy time by μ. In [2], in modeling of theory of Fuzzy Time computation and Fuzzy Time Computation we employ η. What is the relation between these two terms? More exactly, we should show how η could be calculated from μ, throughout this article we do it. References 1.????????∗=????????????∗? (Second version), F.Didehvar, Philpapers 2025 2. Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation (TC* vs TC,TQC), F.Didehvar, HAL, 2023.

This paper explores the paradox that societies composed of rational individuals often act irrationally at the collective level. While rationality guides individual decision-making, aggregation produces systemic distortions, coordination failures, and unconscious dynamics that undermine collective coherence. The study begins with an intellectual history of attempts to explain collective irrationality, from crowd psychology and social choice theory to economic sociology and the concept of the social unconscious. It then proposes a holistic categorization of mechanisms by which rationality collapses in the aggregate. (...) Finally, three case studies—the collapse of the Soviet Union, contemporary apocalyptic dynamics, and the Middle East scenario—illustrate how rational actors, guided by both conscious and unconscious motives, can collectively generate irrational outcomes. (shrink)

Here we complete and develop the subjects in [2], [3], [4] based on [1]. It should be mentioned again that the author knows TC* more near to the real situation of Computation rather TC even if we forget the fuzziness of time, the reason is different errors especially in computing time. By accepting this point the author tries to show the importance of such type of articles. This manuscript is the first version. In chapter 1 we define the major Complexity (...) classes and we discuss about. In chapter 2, we prove for μ which has a finite area, P_μ^*≠NP_μ^*. In chapter 3 we define some fuzzy functions μ such that P_μ^*=NP_μ^*. (shrink)

We are in the era of AI. AI has positive and negative impacts on science and society. How does it show its impact on theories, specially our specific subject? Here, we try to show a positive impact of it on Theoretical subjects to strengthen our power of algebraic computation.

The reason ability of considering time as a fuzzy concept is demonstrated in [7],[8]. One of the major questions which arise here is the new definitions of Complexity Classes. In [1],[2],…,[11] we show why we should consider time a fuzzy concept. It is noticeable to mention that that there were many attempts to consider time as a Fuzzy concept, in Philosophy, Mathematics and later in Physics but mostly based on the personal intuition of the authors or as a style of (...) Fuzzifying different various of the concepts. Consequently, fuzzifying time doesn’t go to be popular. In the new attempts we are trying to show why we are somewhat forced to consider time as a Fuzzy concept. It is mostly based on the “Unexpected Hanging Paradox” introduced by a Swedish Mathematician Lennart Ekbom. Our question is:” what will be the impact of it in Theory of Computation and Physics?”. Here, we discuss about the impact of fuzzifying time on Theory of Computation. (shrink)

This article investigates the role of evangelical apocalyptic thought in shaping conflicts in the Middle East, with particular attention to U.S. foreign policy and Israeli politics. Beginning with the guiding question—Do some evangelicals and their apocalyptic ideas shape the fighting in the Middle East?—the study traces the historical roots of evangelical influence in American society, their rise as a political force, and their division into passive and radical groups. While the passive majority emphasizes moral living and cultural values, the radical (...) minority interprets contemporary events as fulfillments of biblical prophecy, exerting disproportionate influence on U.S. policy. -/- The article examines the views of prominent radical evangelicals—John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Mike Pence, Ted Cruz, and Marjorie Taylor Greene—particularly regarding Iran, highlighting how prophecy-driven narratives intersect with geopolitical strategies. It then poses two further questions: whether Benjamin Netanyahu, intentionally or not, aligns more closely with radical evangelicals than with mainstream Jewish perspectives, and whether U.S.–Israeli policy risks drifting away from pragmatic security concerns and geopolitical calculations toward apocalyptic frameworks. -/- By situating evangelical apocalypticism within the broader context of religion, politics, and war, the article underscores the dangers of prophecy-driven policymaking and its potential to destabilize the Middle East by neglecting realpolitik security imperatives and long-term geopolitical stability. -/- This article was written with the assistance of AI, although the major idea and conceptual framework belong to the author. (shrink)

Throughout this paper, in a nutshell we try to show a way to check Fuzzy time in general and Fuzzy time-Particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, experimentally..

We have shown the plausibility of considering time as a Fuzzy concept instead of classical time [7], [8]. By considering time as a fuzzy concept, we will have new classes of Complexity. Here, we show that how some famous problems will be solved in this new picture.

Throughout this paper, we are trying to show how and why our Mathematical frame-work seems inappropriate to solve problems in Theory of Computation. More exactly, the concept of turning back in time in paradoxes causes inconsistency in modeling of the concept of Time in some semantic situations. As we see in the first chapter, by introducing a version of “Unexpected Hanging Paradox”,first we attempt to open a new explanation for some paradoxes. In the second step, by applying this paradox, it (...) is demonstrated that any formalized system for the Theory of Computation based on Classical Logic and Turing Model of Computation leads us to a contradiction. We conclude that our mathematical frame work is inappropriate for Theory of Computation. Furthermore, the result provides us a reason that many problems in Complexity Theory resist to be solved.(This work is completed in 2017 -5- 2, it is in vixra in 2017-5-14, presented in Unilog 2018, Vichy). (shrink)

The major point in [1] chapter 2 is the following claim: “Any formalized system for the Theory of Computation based on Classical Logic and Turing Model of Computation leads us to a contradiction.” So, in the case we wish to save Classical Logic we should change our Computational Model. As we see in chapter two, the mentioned contradiction is about and around the concept of time, as it is in the contradiction of modified version of paradox. It is natural to (...) try fabricating the paradox not by time but in some other linear ordering or the concept of space. Interestingly, the attempts to have similar contradiction by the other concepts like space and linear ordering, is failed. It is remarkable that, the paradox is considered either Epistemological or Logical traditionally, but by new considerations the new version of paradox should be considered as either Logical or Physical paradox. Hence, in order to change our Computational Model, it is natural to change the concept of time, but how? We start from some models that are different from the classical one but they are intuitively plausible. The idea of model is somewhat introduced by Brouwer and Husserl [3]. This model doesn’t refute the paradox, since the paradox and the associated contradiction would be repeated in this new model. The model is introduced in [2]. Here we give some more explanations. (shrink)

We consider time as a fuzzy concept. Based on this, the Fuzzy Time-Particle interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics is introduced as an interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [4],[5],[6]. Here, we show how to compute the function associated to Fuzzy time.

In [Is Classical Mathematics Appropriate for Theory of Computation?] we show there is a contradiction which in [“Fuzzy Time”, a solution of Unexpected Hanging Paradox (A Fuzzy interpretation of Quantum Mechanics), Philpapers 2019-04-13] we give a solution for that. This is the starting point for new Theories, Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation and Fuzzy Time –Particle interpretation of quantum Mechanics. A question is remained which was mentioned in [Two points and two questions, F.Didehvar, Philpapers, Researchgate, 2025]. Is this contradiction a (...) contradiction in Mathematics too? Here, we try to answer this question. The article belongs to a group of articles which presents the logical back bone of this line of research. (shrink)

In a series of articles we try to show the need of a novel Theory for Theory of Computation based on considering time as a Fuzzy concept. Time is a central concept In Physics. First we were forced to consider some changes and modifications in the Theories of Physics. In the second step and throughout this article we show the positive Impact of this modification on Theory of Computation and Complexity Theory to rebuild it in a more successful and fruitful (...) approach. We call this novel Theory TC*. (shrink)

In our research about Fuzzy Time and modeling time, "Unexpected Hanging Paradox" plays a major role. Here, we compare this paradox to the Zeno Paradox and the relations of them with our standard models of continuum and Fuzzy numbers. To do this, we review the project "Fuzzy Time and Possible Impacts of It on Science" and introduce a new way in order to approach the solutions for these paradoxes. Additionally, we have a more general discussion about paradoxes, as Philosophical back (...) ground of the subject and in this way, we introduce the concepts of General View, the first picture, BBF-General View. (shrink)

Here, we continue the discussion in [1], about infinities in Physics. Our goal is to create a Mathematical system to give a probable explanation for infinities in QED, based on Fuzzy time. This Mathematical system should be sufficiently satisfactory and Simple. In general, our goal of these series, is to provide more reasons to consider time as a fuzzy concept in a way that is explained in [4], [5], [6].

Here, by introducing a version of “Unexpected hanging paradox” first we try to open a new way and a new explanation for paradoxes, similar to liar paradox. Also, we will show that we have a semantic situation which no syntactical logical system could support it. Finally, we propose a claim in Theory of Computation about the consistency of this Theory. One of the major claim is:Theory of Computation and Classical Logic leads us to a contradiction.

(THIS PAPER NEEDS A CORRECTION) Satisfaction is a complex concept which has a key role in each individual’s everyday life and impacts their behavior. Abraham Maslow (1943) suggested a framework [1] to study human motivation, which was a starting point towards developing the quality of life(QOL) theory. On that article, he described a hierarchy of human needs, that is generally consist of fundamental needs which are required for human survival, and environment dependent ones, like society, safety and etc. In this (...) study, we are trying to represent a tangible mathematical model for assessing the sense of need for water in terms of the available source of water. On this very subject, M. Joseph Sirgy [2] states that ”From a human developmental perspective, QOL goals can be defined as satisfaction of human developmental needs in a community or society”. Accordingly, in the first section we propose a model for the water needs of an individual. In the second section, we continue the discussion by checking the behavior of the model on a given population, and each time by assuming that we have two out of three involved factors, we try to suggest an estimation for the other one. (shrink)

Here, we show that by accepting Fuzzy time-Particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, the singularities in the new Model are vanished.

The question of some of the friends is: How is it possible to explain “Double slit experiment” by “Fuzzy time-Particle Interpretation”?

The Theory of Computation in its existed form is based on Church –Turing Thesis. Throughout this paper, we show that the Turing computation model of this theory leads us to a contradiction. In brief, by applying a well-known paradox (Unexpected hanging paradox) we show a contradiction in the Theory when we consider the Turing model as our Computation model.