Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 6.3m America voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 6.3m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 6.3m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8KZ52SJ from Pennsylvania  answered…6yrs6Y

 @8D7X8VB from Pennsylvania  answered…6yrs6Y

Yes, apply appropriate oversight, no subsidies, and mandate cost of energy = cost to produce energy + cost to environment/cleanup .

 @8N5DRPD from Texas  answered…6yrs6Y

 @9VJZZCG from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for now, not in the long term. We can’t realistically switch to clean energy at the snap of a finger, so we should use it now but gradually decrease it as we taper off fossil fuels in general in favor of green energy.

 @98DPQVY from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @B7PLSK2 from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

Yes because I feel like there are worse things and there are things we need it for, And No because I feel like we need to look at the more long term affects of fracking while also trying to find other sustainable resources to use to.

 @9TFRWGM from Delaware  answered…2yrs2Y

We should pursue more sustainable energy and research the long term effects of fracking. However, until it’s affordable and sustainable, we should limit it to less vulnerable areas.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fracking” news articles, updated frequently.