From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v4 |
Date: | 2009-12-01 16:33:54 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If people are agreed that double connect is a better alternative
I still kinda like 'SET DEFAULT', but I'm far from wed to it. A double
connect certainly seems like it would be better than the
inconsistency.
> I'm willing to go look at how to make it happen.
That's good, 'cos I'm sure it'll end up being a whole lot less ugly
than if I did it :-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2009-12-01 16:39:51 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO`s gimme_tree function so that it always finds a |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-01 16:28:22 | Re: Application name patch - v4 |