Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-22 13:51:26
Message-ID: [email protected]
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> you'd still need to compare the
> statement somehow

You right, I think about that as syntax sugar. Maybe with some performance
increase but hardly. We can save on a round trip.

It may be necessary to add an index on the field "statement"?

Thanks.
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-03-22 13:55:17 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2016-03-22 13:49:15 Re: multivariate statistics v14