Skip to main content
European Commission logo
EU Social Economy Gateway

Taxation in support of the social economy

new tax

All EU Member States apply some sort of tax measures to support the social economy as a whole, or to support specific types of social economy entities. Often existing tax practices have been designed for the traditional philanthropy, which in most cases predate the introduction of the concept of the social economy and therefore do not target specifically social economy entities. Not all social economy entities are charitable/philanthropic organisations, while the traditional tax practices generally only favour ‘non-profit entities’ that pursue a ‘public benefit objective’. Social economy entities, however, operate by providing goods and services for the market in an entrepreneurial and often innovative fashion, having social and/or environmental objectives as the reason for their commercial activity. The definition of a social economy entity does therefore not always fit the descriptions included in relevant tax legislation.   

The European Commission launched in 2021 the Action plan for the social economy: Building an economy that works for people (SEAP) in which it recognises the potential of the social economy as a key driver for economic and social development in Europe. The plan contains over 60 actions to support the development of social economy. One of the key actions was the adoption of a Council Recommendation on developing social economy framework conditions (2023). The recommendation recognises that taxation policy can have a significant role in fostering the social economy.  

In this context, the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG EMPL) in cooperation with the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union (DG TAXUD) organised a series of three mutual learning workshops on ‘Taxation in support of the social economy’, aimed at providing national authorities with an overall understanding of the role of tax systems in the social economy ecosystem and the potential of tax systems in fostering or hindering the social economy. This page summarises the different tax measures in support of the social economy discussed during the three mutual learning workshops.  

Ch1

The workshops welcomed around 40 public officials from national and regional administrations across 14 Member States, as well as thematic experts, social economy representatives, OECD and European Commission officials. Participants were invited to discuss and exchange tax practices in support of the social economy, assess the effects of these tax measures, as well as reflect on whether their national taxation frameworks could be adapted to better encourage and foster the development of the social economy. 

1. Relevant tax measures in support of the social economy

2. Tax measures for social economy entities

Most Member States apply limitations to the amount and conditions under which social economy entities can access tax exemptions (some Member States exempt all income, while in other Member States income tax exemptions only apply if profits are reinvested in a non-profit purpose). The diverse nature of social economy entities can make it difficult for them to fit into a corporate taxation framework which is still largely dominated by the traditional classification of entities into ‘for-profit’ and ‘charity’.   

Examples of legal status as a basis for the tax relief: 

  • Italy

    Social cooperatives in Italy are exempted from payment of corporate tax (IRES) on retained profits (non-distributed profits) and can carry out business activities which have the applicability of the business income tax legislation. However, social enterprises do not enjoy any of the fiscal advantages provided to cooperatives: they are subject to the payment of corporate tax, VAT, IRAP (a regional production tax) and social security costs (if they engage in work integration activities) just as any other enterprise. 

  • Lithuania

    Associations in Lithuania have access to tax practices while still enjoying the right to carry out economic and commercial activities (unless they are explicitly prohibited by law, and unless it contradicts its statutes).

Examples of activities as a basis for the tax relief:

  • Germany

    Public benefit organisations can benefit from tax support measures, provided they don’t pursue any economic activity as their main purpose. Nonetheless, some auxiliary commercial activities in support of the non-profit purpose which only play a subordinate role are still allowed. These activities may be related and unrelated to the core activity of the association. If the annual revenue from unrelated economic activity stays below EUR 45,000, it is not taxed. 

  • Spain

    The profits obtained by not-for-profit associations, derived from the exercise of economic activities and the provision of services, must be used exclusively for the fulfilment of their purposes, and may under no circumstances be distributed among the members, their spouses or persons living with them. 

2.2. Other types of tax measures for social economy entities

There are two main forms of differentiated VAT rules: exemptions and reduced rates. Unlike other forms of tax measures VAT exemptions or being out of scope of VAT are not necessarily of benefit to the social economy entity. The first workshop discussed existing issues and potential solutions around VAT exemptions/at reduced rate. 

Financial instruments can refer to many different types of monetary contracts of which stocks and bonds are the most common ones. They are less commonly applied to social economy entities in EU Member States. However, one example is providing tax benefits to individuals and companies that buy shares issued by (new) social economy entities (also through crowdfunding platforms) or bonds issued by banks or social economy entities themselves to finance the development of social projects, allowing social economy entities to create a bottom-up supply of financial resources. 

There are other financial support non-fiscal measures for social economy entities outside the fiscal framework, of which grants and subsidies are the most common. Other well-known measures are preferences in public procurement; however not all social economy entities qualify for this preference. Another measure is using the label of European Social Entrepreneurship Fund (EuSEF), which is designed to identify funds focusing on European social businesses, making it easier for them to attract investment.

3. Tax measures in support of corporate and individual donations to social economy entities

A condition for the tax benefit at the level of the donor is that the social economy entity as recipient of a donation needs to qualify as a public benefit organisation. If the social economy entity has not qualified for this public benefit status, then the donor will not receive any tax benefit. 

3.1. Deduction from taxable income

Tax deduction is the most popular tax measure among Member States, which can be awarded to individual and/or to corporate donors. The design of a tax deduction can vary considerably, with Member States either limiting the deduction to a ceiling of donor’s income (total or taxable, usually in percentage), or setting a specific amount of allowable deduction (often in a range between a minimum and maximum amount). Some states, like Cyprus, have no limits on charitable deductions.   

  • Deduction from a taxable income is based on a progressive income taxation system, which makes it more beneficial for wealthier taxpayers; 

  • Maximum and minimum donation amounts can be set. 

Examples: 

  • Cyprus

    Donations made by corporations are completely deductible without any limitations (as long as the entity responds to the criteria of a charitable entity as included in the law). 

  • Netherlands

    Donors can deduct up to 10% of their gross income for a one-off donation, but there is a minimum donation of EUR 60. In case of regular donations, they can be deducted up to EUR 250,000. 

3.2. Tax credit

A tax credit is an amount that is deducted directly from the tax liability rather than from taxable income. Tax credits are less common than tax deductions. In terms of corporate giving, it is very rare for Member States to opt for a tax credit as a tax measure. A notable feature of tax credits is that it is based upon the value of the donation and not on the total income and marginal tax rate (as is the case with deductions from the taxable base), provided their tax liability is at least equal to the value of the credit.   

  • Tax credits provide a deduction based upon the amount of the donation, regardless of the overall income levels; this makes tax credits more equal for all donors; 

  • In some cases, tax credits are considered less efficient, which might lead to fewer donors wanting to make use of them. 

Examples: 

  • Belgium

    The law distinguishes donations made by individuals and corporations. Individuals benefit from a non-refundable tax credit of 45% subject to ceilings on both the percentage of the donor’s net income and the amounts exempted (the minimum donation must exceed EUR 40). Companies can claim tax deductions of up to 5% of the taxable income.  

  • France

    The law distinguishes donations made by individual and corporations. Individuals may benefit from tax reductions up to 66% of the value of their gifts. Corporate donations are entitled to a tax credit of up to 60% of the actual amount donated (and 40% for payments exceeding EUR 2 million). 

3.3. Matching

In the so-called ‘matching grants’ systems, the government tops up charitable donations made by individuals to specific charitable entities. A donation must be made to an entity that is either a tax-exempt charity that has applied and received an authorisation for these purposes of the tax authority or another entity that is specifically designated by law.   

  • Social economy entities can claim a matching benefit at a certain rate from the tax authority, regardless of the donor’s total income; 

  • In economic experiments, matching grant subsidies sometimes stand out as measures which are more efficient than tax deductions when it comes to encouraging giving. 

Example: 

  • Ireland

    The Charitable Donation Scheme provides tax relief for qualifying donations made to an approved charity. 

    When an individual donates a minimum of EUR 250 (up to EUR 1,000,000) within a year, the receiving entity can request a matching payment from the tax authority at a rate of 31%, or 10% if a connection between the donor and the charity can be proven (for example via employment), on that donation.

4. Cross-border donations and equal treatment

Although most Member States allow taxpayers to make tax-privileged donations to social economy entities established in another EU Member State, often they also apply limitations to tax measures on cross-border donations (the receiving entity may for example have to register on a list of approved entities in the Member State of the donor); 

The establishment of a European public benefit legal status which would be recognised across the EU could be considered in the future a way to ensure equal treatment for social economy entities in the EU. 

Examples: 

  • France

    If a foreign organisation has not previously gained approval, taxpayers can still submit evidence to the tax authority demonstrating compliance with the necessary requirements for approval. 

  • Spain

    Tax measures for cross-border donations to social economy entities in Spain should be treated in the same way as domestic donations provided that the entity that receives the donation is effectively included in article 2 of the Act 49/2002 and complies with the requirements listed in its article 3. 

Discussion Papers