NISO Link Origin Tracking
Nettie Lagace, NISO - @abugseye
NISO Update
ALA Annual, Orlando, June 26, 2016
Work item
• Approved by NISO Voting Members Q1 2016
• Purpose: Develop a recommended practice to
allow libraries, publishers, and other content
providers to accurately track the
sites/platforms from which incoming links
originate when they pass through a link
resolver
Discovery Networked Link Environment
Working Group Goals
• Investigate effective and scalable options to
allow content provider and libraries to
determine original source of link
• Provide guidance on implementation
(including proof-of-concept)
• Provide information on leveraging solution to
obtain accurate statistics on source of traffic
to their site
Working Group*
• Danielle Reisch, Wiley
• Emily Singley, Boston College Libraries
• Mike Sollars, Cengage Learning
• Christine Stohn , Ex Libris, Inc.
• Mike Taylor, Digital Science
• Matthew Treskon, National
Agricultural Library
• Robert Tupelo-Schneck, CNRI
• Ken Varnum, University of Michigan
Library
• Peter Vlahakis, ITHAKA/JSTOR/Portico
• Stephanie Wical, Boston University
• Julie Zhu, IEEE
• Nasreen Arain, Taylor and Francis
• Sacha Arnold, Innovative Interfaces,
Inc.
• Jacques Doux, Elsevier
• Michael Fernandez, American
University Library
• David Fritsch, ITHAKA/JSTOR/Portico
Don Hamparian, OCLC
• Paul Jessop, International DOI
Foundation (IDF)
• Chuck Koscher, CrossRef
• Eddie Neuwirth, ProQuest
• Lisa O'Hara, University of Manitoba
Libraries
• Gary Pollack, EBSCO Information
Services
Benefits & Challenges
• Once we have the ability to track link origins, what will that enable my
institution to do that it cannot do now? Please provide at least 2 benefits.
– Analytics
– Communication
– Quality Improvements
– User Knowledge
– Value of Discovery
• What are two challenges that you believe face this workgroup on the path to
developing a tracking link origins recommended practice?
– Adoption
– Conformance
– Data standards
– Implementation
– Privacy
– Reporting
– Tracking
Thank you! Questions?

ALA 2016 NISO Standards Update Link Origin Tracking

  • 1.
    NISO Link OriginTracking Nettie Lagace, NISO - @abugseye NISO Update ALA Annual, Orlando, June 26, 2016
  • 2.
    Work item • Approvedby NISO Voting Members Q1 2016 • Purpose: Develop a recommended practice to allow libraries, publishers, and other content providers to accurately track the sites/platforms from which incoming links originate when they pass through a link resolver
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Working Group Goals •Investigate effective and scalable options to allow content provider and libraries to determine original source of link • Provide guidance on implementation (including proof-of-concept) • Provide information on leveraging solution to obtain accurate statistics on source of traffic to their site
  • 5.
    Working Group* • DanielleReisch, Wiley • Emily Singley, Boston College Libraries • Mike Sollars, Cengage Learning • Christine Stohn , Ex Libris, Inc. • Mike Taylor, Digital Science • Matthew Treskon, National Agricultural Library • Robert Tupelo-Schneck, CNRI • Ken Varnum, University of Michigan Library • Peter Vlahakis, ITHAKA/JSTOR/Portico • Stephanie Wical, Boston University • Julie Zhu, IEEE • Nasreen Arain, Taylor and Francis • Sacha Arnold, Innovative Interfaces, Inc. • Jacques Doux, Elsevier • Michael Fernandez, American University Library • David Fritsch, ITHAKA/JSTOR/Portico Don Hamparian, OCLC • Paul Jessop, International DOI Foundation (IDF) • Chuck Koscher, CrossRef • Eddie Neuwirth, ProQuest • Lisa O'Hara, University of Manitoba Libraries • Gary Pollack, EBSCO Information Services
  • 6.
    Benefits & Challenges •Once we have the ability to track link origins, what will that enable my institution to do that it cannot do now? Please provide at least 2 benefits. – Analytics – Communication – Quality Improvements – User Knowledge – Value of Discovery • What are two challenges that you believe face this workgroup on the path to developing a tracking link origins recommended practice? – Adoption – Conformance – Data standards – Implementation – Privacy – Reporting – Tracking
  • 7.